Sociopath Community

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 ughhhh. it sux, his forum looks so nice

There's plenty of other software choices and he's shown himself to be a script kiddy repurposer. 

If you scoured the net enough you'd be liable to find the same code elsewhere, otherwise on your way towards finding it you're liable to find similar if not better code to appropriate or modify. 

If you're going to take shortcuts, make sure it's not PR suicide from someone with a self-destruct button. There's too much risk here even in a world that has him having decent PR, like installing a backdoor or something to that effect. 

Meta's forum has been in fine shape, amazing functionality, and while his first shut down caught me off guard for how sudden it was (it got me in the middle of a post even with no warning, but he's apologized for that so it's old news), I don't foresee it happening that way again, both from the problem content being off of here and from him seeing how sudden it formerly was as a mistake. 

 ya I have worse trust issues than you though and he cant be trusted to not nuke it again from my perspective, as decent as his code is. i just dont trust like that

But you trust Cawk won't post CP?

Or you are fine with him posting CP, since you don't trust like that?

Or is cawk more trustworthy then I, to you? I would assume this is most likely. And not very smart lol, not because I will do something or claim to be very trustworthy, but because cawk is delusional, in addition to everything else that he is and has done.

I think you just want cawk back. Not entirely sure why, I tend to believe its because you don't like anyone being banned, but not convinced.
I have no issues with whatever you are doing tho, but your reasoning eludes me.

Good said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 ughhhh. it sux, his forum looks so nice

There's plenty of other software choices and he's shown himself to be a script kiddy repurposer. 

If you scoured the net enough you'd be liable to find the same code elsewhere, otherwise on your way towards finding it you're liable to find similar if not better code to appropriate or modify. 

If you're going to take shortcuts, make sure it's not PR suicide from someone with a self-destruct button. There's too much risk here even in a world that has him having decent PR, like installing a backdoor or something to that effect. 

Meta's forum has been in fine shape, amazing functionality, and while his first shut down caught me off guard for how sudden it was (it got me in the middle of a post even with no warning, but he's apologized for that so it's old news), I don't foresee it happening that way again, both from the problem content being off of here and from him seeing how sudden it formerly was as a mistake. 

 ya I have worse trust issues than you though and he cant be trusted to not nuke it again from my perspective, as decent as his code is. i just dont trust like that

But you trust Cawk won't post CP?

Or you are fine with him posting CP, since you don't trust like that?

Or is cawk more trustworthy then I, to you? I would assume this is most likely. And not very smart lol, not because I will do something or claim to be very trustworthy, but because cawk is delusional, in addition to everything else that he is and has done.

 

I think you just want cawk back. Not entirely sure why, I tend to believe its because you don't like anyone being banned, but not convinced.
I have no issues with whatever you are doing tho, but your reasoning eludes me.

 no I dont trust Cawk either lol

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 that you have to say this doesn't bode well. Will you let him back in?

I attack him and now you say that doesn't bode well? 

Do you even know what you're talking about anymore, as it seems more like you just want to make an okay presentation despite seeing your error at this point; "Saving Face". 

So what is this really about, Misscomm? 

 I gotta go to work so I'll reply more later. 

But you never answered the question TC - would you let him on your new forum?

You never answered my point about me and Inq either, but that seems to be fine with you. 

To answer your question with another question though: Why don't you ever try to get on Jim's case over this sort of thing? 

Good said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 ughhhh. it sux, his forum looks so nice

There's plenty of other software choices and he's shown himself to be a script kiddy repurposer. 

If you scoured the net enough you'd be liable to find the same code elsewhere, otherwise on your way towards finding it you're liable to find similar if not better code to appropriate or modify. 

If you're going to take shortcuts, make sure it's not PR suicide from someone with a self-destruct button. There's too much risk here even in a world that has him having decent PR, like installing a backdoor or something to that effect. 

Meta's forum has been in fine shape, amazing functionality, and while his first shut down caught me off guard for how sudden it was (it got me in the middle of a post even with no warning, but he's apologized for that so it's old news), I don't foresee it happening that way again, both from the problem content being off of here and from him seeing how sudden it formerly was as a mistake. 

 ya I have worse trust issues than you though and he cant be trusted to not nuke it again from my perspective, as decent as his code is. i just dont trust like that

But you trust Cawk won't post CP?

Or you are fine with him posting CP, since you don't trust like that?

Or is cawk more trustworthy then I, to you? I would assume this is most likely. And not very smart lol, not because I will do something or claim to be very trustworthy, but because cawk is delusional, in addition to everything else that he is and has done.

She just really wants her forum software, both as a backup and personal project, to be done sooner rather than later. 

She's been on-and-off at learning to code, and probably wants a faster solution than having it be a solo project. 

I think you just want cawk back. Not entirely sure why, I tend to believe its because you don't like anyone being banned, but not convinced.

I have no issues with whatever you are doing tho, but your reasoning eludes me.

From her words anyway, she doesn't want anyone banned if it can be helped... before listing both CP legality and lawsuits as reasonable ideas for blacklisting someone. 

She's logically on your page while emotionally elsewhere, plus with how often she's been seen as "spammy" she probably has a soft spot for it. She's even ignoring that Cawk was totally in agreeance with Luna over Xadem and Turquie being people worth keeping off of BZ, and that other forums would be smart to do the same.

cawk has got to love this attention

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 ughhhh. it sux, his forum looks so nice

There's plenty of other software choices and he's shown himself to be a script kiddy repurposer. 

If you scoured the net enough you'd be liable to find the same code elsewhere, otherwise on your way towards finding it you're liable to find similar if not better code to appropriate or modify. 

If you're going to take shortcuts, make sure it's not PR suicide from someone with a self-destruct button. There's too much risk here even in a world that has him having decent PR, like installing a backdoor or something to that effect. 

Meta's forum has been in fine shape, amazing functionality, and while his first shut down caught me off guard for how sudden it was (it got me in the middle of a post even with no warning, but he's apologized for that so it's old news), I don't foresee it happening that way again, both from the problem content being off of here and from him seeing how sudden it formerly was as a mistake. 

 ya I have worse trust issues than you though and he cant be trusted to not nuke it again from my perspective, as decent as his code is. i just dont trust like that

But you trust Cawk won't post CP?

Or you are fine with him posting CP, since you don't trust like that?

Or is cawk more trustworthy then I, to you? I would assume this is most likely. And not very smart lol, not because I will do something or claim to be very trustworthy, but because cawk is delusional, in addition to everything else that he is and has done.

She just really wants her forum software, both as a backup and personal project, to be done sooner rather than later. 

She's been on-and-off at learning to code, and probably wants a faster solution than having it be a solo project. 

I think you just want cawk back. Not entirely sure why, I tend to believe its because you don't like anyone being banned, but not convinced.

I have no issues with whatever you are doing tho, but your reasoning eludes me.

From her words anyway, she doesn't want anyone banned if it can be helped... before listing both CP legality and lawsuits as reasonable ideas for blacklisting someone. 

She's logically on your page while emotionally elsewhere, plus with how often she's been seen as "spammy" she probably has a soft spot for it. She's even ignoring that Cawk was totally in agreeance with Luna over Xadem and Turquie being people worth keeping off of BZ, and that other forums would be smart to do the same.

 ye

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Nah, it's your standard play, TC. Cause you hate the rules and enforcing them.

This is far from my reasoning behind it. He's displayed that he cannot stop spamming CP, so there's nothing to even barter with for terms. 

You ought to actually read what's being said instead of just making up stories, it's been a pretty open setup for what's going on. 

When pedos get banned you make sure they still have a voice on this platform by posting their crap for them and giving them attention. 

Do I now? You see mocking people as giving them a platform? 

Does this also mean Luna and Boh are pedos now? 

Didn't you and turquie say you're working on a new forum so cawk can come back? lol You should just work with him like you did before wth EC.

What's your beef with me?

All I'd said is I want a backup in case this place bombs again, seeing as he decided to shut the place down while Cawk's content was as far back as page three. 

If you're the advisor on Meta's shoulder, we ought to watch out, as you never know the entire story. 

For real though, you have had weird issues with me ever since I started hitting on Inq and implying we know each other more than you know about, even down to you interrogating me over if I find him attractive. Is there something you want to share with the rest of the class? 

You fought so long to keep him here and now you are posting his stuff on the daily it seems odd. Obsessed much?

What do you think would happen to cawk if you didn't keep posting his stuff here? 

Luna and Bo weren't banned so that's a false equivalency. What I'm curious about is whether you miss cawk or if you're just pissed he went back to Luna's site. Your ultimate betrayal. lol

edit: actually maybe you just miss luna's forum

 the primary obsession seems to be with luna (and anyone she modded) but i think the fact that cawk wasn't so easily manipulated means tc feels the need to keep punishing him forever. he really can't let anything go.

Billy said: 

cawk has got to love this attention

The things he loves are what unbalance him the most. 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Yes, you better watch out, MC is the one calling the shots around here.

Or was it Sturm?

Maybe it was Kronos?

 

I mean it depends on who you ask(and also when you ask and on their current mood).

Being on your shoulder thankfully isn't inside of your head. 

I mean even annoying parrots can accomplish a perch on one's shoulder just like a cartoonish 90s conscience can. 

can cockroaches also?