Sociopath Community

Lol MissC, It’s funny how you are basically screaming for someone to stuff their face between your legs and sniff the hell out of you.

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechatta said:

Dm isn't really forum, i mean forgotten as of out of sight out of mind. No one here is having a "good 'ol time remember when..." When it comes to Cawk. ...there's no spark to talk about.

Are you just going to ignore the spark of humor? 

There's only a spark of humor because you make it so, otherwise there really isn't much

You give "The Messenger" too much credit for the gag, it's just me referencing him with screencaps while laughing a bunch. 

I'm not the funny one here, he is. It could be someone horribly unfunny capping the same shit and the laughs would still be very similar. 

The delivery of the message can often affect how the message is received.  Your titles make people click. You're the personification of clickbait

 guys know it wasn't me that posted the cp, that's all that really matters to me. I made a mistake, but that's on me. There isn't any need to think about cawk and what he did on my account tbh

Yes, but would you say this was 'forgettable' or otherwise 'not memorable'? 

Like I said, it didn't really do anything to affect me, you guys know it wasn't me, and unless you bring him up somehow I tend to forget he's a thing. Also when you bring him up is usually when I tend to wonder over to Luna's so I guess you're our bridge.

I really don't think you forget about him, just that you see he wants you to remember him. As a result you try to appear contrarian in that respect, both towards us and yourself. 

Wrong, I just don't think about him. But knowing you I'm never going to be able to change your mind so meh

You never just "forget" about someone you were on PMing terms with. You probably still have screencaps from chats with him too. 

I got a new phone and decided to unclutter and don't really have anything saved up from before this new phone. It's why I asked if anyone has that primal screen to let me know. 

I'm not saying it's bad to laugh at him I'm only saying that you do make him relevant when you make these threads

Alright cool, then we're on the same page here. 

Why do you think I prefer him that way?

Grammatically speaking, you're suggesting here that you do prefer him that way, as opposed to "Why do you think I would prefer him that way?", or "Why would you think I prefer him that way?". 

So, I dunno, why don't you tell us? 

Ugh

Why do you, tc, think that I, Alena, would prefer him- the 'him' being cawk- to be very easy to forget?

Because you don't like him, and because he'd like it if you remembered him. 

You shouldn't let what someone else likes and doesn't like steer you so much. 

 Wow you're getting sloppy

Whorechatta said:

But knowing you I'm never going to be able to change your mind so meh

---

Wow you're getting sloppy

Both of these are just ad homs that let you avoid the discussion. 

I got a new phone and decided to unclutter and don't really have anything saved up from before this new phone. It's why I asked if anyone has that primal screen to let me know.

So... when you get a new phone you forget about the people that were on your old one? 

What? 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechatta said:

But knowing you I'm never going to be able to change your mind so meh

---

Wow you're getting sloppy

Both of these are just ad homs that let you avoid the discussion. 

If you say so~

I got a new phone and decided to unclutter and don't really have anything saved up from before this new phone. It's why I asked if anyone has that primal screen to let me know.

So... when you get a new phone you forget about the people that were on your old one? 

What? 

 You said I probably had screens. He and I haven't pm'd in a long while 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 that you have to say this doesn't bode well. Will you let him back in?

I attack him and now you say that doesn't bode well? 

Do you even know what you're talking about anymore, as it seems more like you just want to make an okay presentation despite seeing your error at this point; "Saving Face". 

So what is this really about, Misscomm? 

 I gotta go to work so I'll reply more later. 

But you never answered the question TC - would you let him on your new forum?

 TC, you’re deflecting so much. I don't have a problem with you other than you annoyed me because you stood in the way of getting rid of pedo content. And it ended up in the forum being shut down. In the past you fought removing the same content from luna’s and we lost most of our users. And then when CP posters were banned, you fought that too.  

 My point was that you keep giving cawk attention and bringing him up, which is curious/funny to me.

 You can find him funny if you want, that's fine, but don't pretend it's unnatural for me to wonder about it since you're the only one bringing him up and you were the only one defending him when he was posting pro-diddle content.

what a pedantic goody two shoes hair splitting little faggit lmaooooo

MissCommunication said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 that you have to say this doesn't bode well. Will you let him back in?

I attack him and now you say that doesn't bode well? 

Do you even know what you're talking about anymore, as it seems more like you just want to make an okay presentation despite seeing your error at this point; "Saving Face". 

So what is this really about, Misscomm? 

 I gotta go to work so I'll reply more later. 

But you never answered the question TC - would you let him on your new forum?

 TC, you’re deflecting so much. I don't have a problem with you other than you annoyed me because you stood in the way of getting rid of pedo content. And it ended up in the forum being shut down. In the past you fought removing the same content from luna’s and we lost most of our users. And then when CP posters were banned, you fought that too.  

For real though, what's this really about? 

We're past this now. 

My point was that you keep giving cawk attention and bringing him up, which is curious/funny to me.

Yet it's not when I've laughed at others? 

I think you're trying to find things where they aren't. 

You can find him funny if you want, that's fine, but don't pretend it's unnatural for me to wonder about it since you're the only one bringing him up and you were the only one defending him when he was posting pro-diddle content.

It's only unnatural because of how you're aiming to frame it. 

asking someone 'what's this realllly about' when they just told u is grounds for a backhand

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 that you have to say this doesn't bode well. Will you let him back in?

I attack him and now you say that doesn't bode well? 

Do you even know what you're talking about anymore, as it seems more like you just want to make an okay presentation despite seeing your error at this point; "Saving Face". 

So what is this really about, Misscomm? 

 I gotta go to work so I'll reply more later. 

But you never answered the question TC - would you let him on your new forum?

 TC, you’re deflecting so much. I don't have a problem with you other than you annoyed me because you stood in the way of getting rid of pedo content. And it ended up in the forum being shut down. In the past you fought removing the same content from luna’s and we lost most of our users. And then when CP posters were banned, you fought that too.  

For real though, what's this really about? 

We're past this now. 

How'd we get past this when I just replied? lol 

My point was that you keep giving cawk attention and bringing him up, which is curious/funny to me.

Yet it's not when I've laughed at others? 

 What others? No one that you fought to keep has been banned before except for Jim. 

I think you're trying to find things where they aren't. 

I  just made an observation that you and turq are the only ones giving cawk attn. If you say there's nothing there, then ok.  

 

You can find him funny if you want, that's fine, but don't pretend it's unnatural for me to wonder about it since you're the only one bringing him up and you were the only one defending him when he was posting pro-diddle content.

It's only unnatural because of how you're aiming to frame it. 

 I'm not framing anything. I'm just noting that you’re making threads about cawk. And turquie is making threads about how you and her are building a new forum where cawk wont be banned. In this very thread she even said she wanted cawk to work on it. lol It's just what you're doing. 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechatta said:

But knowing you I'm never going to be able to change your mind so meh

---

Wow you're getting sloppy

Both of these are just ad homs that let you avoid the discussion. 

If you say so~

TC’s retorts now are generally a variation of one of these:

-          You obviously didn’t read what’s going on./If you bothered to read you’d know what’s going on.

-          Ad hominem! <maybe insert tl;dr ad hominem graphic> 

-          Bandwagon/group think/parrot/you're being steered