Sociopath Community

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

Whorechata said: 

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

His activity isn't even his own on our website, so why should it really matter? Should we not be quoting other people from other websites just because we don't like them? Is there a "We are not allowed to talk about blacklisted users" rule I didn't hear about? The CP is off the website, so what's the problem? 

Also seeing these two as the same situation either takes ignorance or effort, and the tone wasn't concealed in either case. While I was fighting for Jim's case, the lead up to each came from very different context and ideas. The underlying differences are somewhat responsible for why Jim can still log on here while Cawk cannot. 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

His activity isn't even his own on our website, so why should it really matter? Should we not be quoting other people from other websites just because we don't like them? Is there a "We are not allowed to talk about blacklisted users" rule I didn't hear about? The CP is off the website, so what's the problem? 

lol Quit being so defensive. No one said you can't talk about him, post screenshots or make fun of him. Is what I said about you making him relevant and giving him a voice through your fun making and screen posting not true?

Also seeing these two as the same situation either takes ignorance or effort, and the tone wasn't concealed in either case. While I was fighting for Jim's case, the lead up to each came from very different context and ideas. The underlying differences are somewhat responsible for why Jim can still log on here while Cawk cannot. 

 I didn't say the two situations were the same. Only that by making fun of him you are making him relevant at a time were most people have forgotten about him 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

His activity isn't even his own on our website, so why should it really matter? Should we not be quoting other people from other websites just because we don't like them? Is there a "We are not allowed to talk about blacklisted users" rule I didn't hear about? The CP is off the website, so what's the problem? 

lol Quit being so defensive. No one said you can't talk about him, post screenshots or make fun of him. Is what I said about you making him relevant and giving him a voice through your fun making and screen posting not true?

Would you not say the suggested message is that giving him a platform of any kind establishes me as if I'm on his side or some nonsense? 

Also seeing these two as the same situation either takes ignorance or effort, and the tone wasn't concealed in either case. While I was fighting for Jim's case, the lead up to each came from very different context and ideas. The underlying differences are somewhat responsible for why Jim can still log on here while Cawk cannot. 

I didn't say the two situations were the same. Only that by making fun of him you are making him relevant at a time were most people have forgotten about him 

Is he really forgettable though? 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

His activity isn't even his own on our website, so why should it really matter? Should we not be quoting other people from other websites just because we don't like them? Is there a "We are not allowed to talk about blacklisted users" rule I didn't hear about? The CP is off the website, so what's the problem? 

lol Quit being so defensive. No one said you can't talk about him, post screenshots or make fun of him. Is what I said about you making him relevant and giving him a voice through your fun making and screen posting not true?

Would you not say the suggested message is that giving him a platform of any kind establishes me as if I'm on his side or some nonsense? 

No, like I said it's understandable and easy to see you're making fun of him.

Also seeing these two as the same situation either takes ignorance or effort, and the tone wasn't concealed in either case. While I was fighting for Jim's case, the lead up to each came from very different context and ideas. The underlying differences are somewhat responsible for why Jim can still log on here while Cawk cannot. 

I didn't say the two situations were the same. Only that by making fun of him you are making him relevant at a time were most people have forgotten about him 

Is he really forgettable though? 

 No one's really mentioned him except you and jim. He wasn't exactly charismatic, he didn't leave a deep impression. He wasn't a Dexter. He isn't remembered until you post about him or there's some rogue spam threads. I've certainly forgotten about the twerp until I see a thread where you make fun of him or quote him. 

He's very easy to forget

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

His activity isn't even his own on our website, so why should it really matter? Should we not be quoting other people from other websites just because we don't like them? Is there a "We are not allowed to talk about blacklisted users" rule I didn't hear about? The CP is off the website, so what's the problem? 

lol Quit being so defensive. No one said you can't talk about him, post screenshots or make fun of him. Is what I said about you making him relevant and giving him a voice through your fun making and screen posting not true?

Would you not say the suggested message is that giving him a platform of any kind establishes me as if I'm on his side or some nonsense? 

No, like I said it's understandable and easy to see you're making fun of him.

Also seeing these two as the same situation either takes ignorance or effort, and the tone wasn't concealed in either case. While I was fighting for Jim's case, the lead up to each came from very different context and ideas. The underlying differences are somewhat responsible for why Jim can still log on here while Cawk cannot. 

I didn't say the two situations were the same. Only that by making fun of him you are making him relevant at a time were most people have forgotten about him 

Is he really forgettable though? 

 No one's really mentioned him except you and jim. He wasn't exactly charismatic, he didn't leave a deep impression.

He had an entire list of people ranting and raving about wanting him gone, paragraphs worth, and he's a large part of why Meta shut the place down.

That's a deep impression. 

He wasn't a Dexter.

Yes, I love reminding him of how all of his ideas were done by another first, and like 3/4 of them are classic Dex strats. 

Drives him up the wall, having him insist he's "better at it" when not "taking it to a whole new level". 

He isn't remembered until you post about him or there's some rogue spam threads.

I still see people bring him up with me unprovoked related to DMs. 

He's relevant content, just only a proper villain over his inability to truly adapt past his aim to invert his persecution complex. 

I've certainly forgotten about the twerp until I see a thread where you make fun of him or quote him. 

How can you forget about the guy that posted CP on your account? 

Also you've had some fits of giggles over it, is that a bad thing? 

He's very easy to forget

I think you'd just prefer him that way. 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

I can understand what MC means, as during The Lunar Meltdowns TC and a quite a few others were reposting Jim comments/posts if only to piss off Luna and Ed through loopholes. It was still giving a voice to those that were banned for posting Pro-pedophile content(cp). 

I understand that now its meant to make fun of Cawk but its pretty fair to point out that by doing so TC is giving Cawk relevance and a voice on a forum from where he was banned and mostly forgotten until brought up by our main moderator.

His activity isn't even his own on our website, so why should it really matter? Should we not be quoting other people from other websites just because we don't like them? Is there a "We are not allowed to talk about blacklisted users" rule I didn't hear about? The CP is off the website, so what's the problem? 

lol Quit being so defensive. No one said you can't talk about him, post screenshots or make fun of him. Is what I said about you making him relevant and giving him a voice through your fun making and screen posting not true?

Would you not say the suggested message is that giving him a platform of any kind establishes me as if I'm on his side or some nonsense? 

No, like I said it's understandable and easy to see you're making fun of him.

Also seeing these two as the same situation either takes ignorance or effort, and the tone wasn't concealed in either case. While I was fighting for Jim's case, the lead up to each came from very different context and ideas. The underlying differences are somewhat responsible for why Jim can still log on here while Cawk cannot. 

I didn't say the two situations were the same. Only that by making fun of him you are making him relevant at a time were most people have forgotten about him 

Is he really forgettable though? 

 No one's really mentioned him except you and jim. He wasn't exactly charismatic, he didn't leave a deep impression.

He had an entire list of people ranting and raving about wanting him gone, paragraphs worth, and he's a large part of why Meta shut the place down.

That's a deep impression. 

Through sheer repetitive annoyance/spam and cp posting. For anything else? Not really.

He wasn't a Dexter.

Yes, I love reminding him of how all of his ideas were done first, and like 3/4 of them are classic Dex strats. 

Dexter had some variety bless his horny ginger heart 

He isn't remembered until you post about him or there's some rogue spam threads.

I still see people bring him up with me unprovoked related to DMs. 

He's relevant content, just only a proper villain over his inability to truly adapt past his aim to invert his persecution complex. 

Dm isn't really forum, i mean forgotten as of out of sight out of mind. No one here is having a "good 'ol time remember when..." When it comes to Cawk. ...there's no spark to talk about.

I've certainly forgotten about the twerp until I see a thread where you make fun of him or quote him. 

How can you forget about the guy that posted CP on your account? 

Also you've had some fits of giggles over it, is that a bad thing? 

I mean, you guys know it wasn't me that posted the cp, that's all that really matters to me. I made a mistake, but that's on me. There isn't any need to think about cawk and what he did on my account tbh

And ofc I had some giggles about you making fun of it, I've said I forget about him until I see a thread where you bring him up. I'm not saying it's bad to laugh at him I'm only saying that you do make him relevant when you make these threads

He's very easy to forget

I think you'd just prefer him that way. 

 Why do you think I prefer him that way?

Whorechatta said:

Dm isn't really forum, i mean forgotten as of out of sight out of mind. No one here is having a "good 'ol time remember when..." When it comes to Cawk. ...there's no spark to talk about.

Are you just going to ignore the spark of humor? 

I mean, you guys know it wasn't me that posted the cp, that's all that really matters to me. I made a mistake, but that's on me. There isn't any need to think about cawk and what he did on my account tbh

Yes, but would you say this was 'forgettable' or otherwise 'not memorable'? 

I'm not saying it's bad to laugh at him I'm only saying that you do make him relevant when you make these threads

Alright cool, then we're on the same page here. 

Why do you think I prefer him that way?

Grammatically speaking, you're suggesting here that you do prefer him that way, as opposed to "Why do you think I would prefer him that way?", or "Why would you think I prefer him that way?". The question is essentially asking for my version of that truth's reasoning as opposed to questioning if it's even the case. 

So, I dunno, why don't you tell us? 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechatta said:

Dm isn't really forum, i mean forgotten as of out of sight out of mind. No one here is having a "good 'ol time remember when..." When it comes to Cawk. ...there's no spark to talk about.

Are you just going to ignore the spark of humor? 

There's only a spark of humor because you make it so, otherwise there really isn't much

 guys know it wasn't me that posted the cp, that's all that really matters to me. I made a mistake, but that's on me. There isn't any need to think about cawk and what he did on my account tbh

Yes, but would you say this was 'forgettable' or otherwise 'not memorable'? 

Like I said, it didn't really do anything to affect me, you guys know it wasn't me, and unless you bring him up somehow I tend to forget he's a thing. Also when you bring him up is usually when I tend to wonder over to Luna's so I guess you're our bridge.

 

I'm not saying it's bad to laugh at him I'm only saying that you do make him relevant when you make these threads

Alright cool, then we're on the same page here. 

Why do you think I prefer him that way?

Grammatically speaking, you're suggesting here that you do prefer him that way, as opposed to "Why do you think I would prefer him that way?", or "Why would you think I prefer him that way?". 

So, I dunno, why don't you tell us? 

 Ugh

Why do you, tc, think that I, Alena, would prefer him- the 'him' being cawk- to be very easy to forget?

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechatta said:

Dm isn't really forum, i mean forgotten as of out of sight out of mind. No one here is having a "good 'ol time remember when..." When it comes to Cawk. ...there's no spark to talk about.

Are you just going to ignore the spark of humor? 

There's only a spark of humor because you make it so, otherwise there really isn't much

You give "The Messenger" too much credit for the gag, it's just me referencing him with screencaps while laughing a bunch. 

I'm not the funny one here, he is. It could be someone horribly unfunny capping the same shit and the laughs would still be very similar. 

 guys know it wasn't me that posted the cp, that's all that really matters to me. I made a mistake, but that's on me. There isn't any need to think about cawk and what he did on my account tbh

Yes, but would you say this was 'forgettable' or otherwise 'not memorable'? 

Like I said, it didn't really do anything to affect me, you guys know it wasn't me, and unless you bring him up somehow I tend to forget he's a thing. Also when you bring him up is usually when I tend to wonder over to Luna's so I guess you're our bridge.

I really don't think you forget about him, just that you see he wants you to remember him. As a result you try to appear contrarian in that respect, both towards us and yourself. 

You never just "forget" about someone you were on PMing terms with. You probably still have screencaps from chats with him too. 

I'm not saying it's bad to laugh at him I'm only saying that you do make him relevant when you make these threads

Alright cool, then we're on the same page here. 

Why do you think I prefer him that way?

Grammatically speaking, you're suggesting here that you do prefer him that way, as opposed to "Why do you think I would prefer him that way?", or "Why would you think I prefer him that way?". 

So, I dunno, why don't you tell us? 

Ugh

Why do you, tc, think that I, Alena, would prefer him- the 'him' being cawk- to be very easy to forget?

Because you don't like him, and because he'd like it if you remembered him. 

You shouldn't let what someone else likes and doesn't like steer you so much.