Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

Whorechata said: 

Here we go, this is the accurate one 

Here is the source

 The source said the same thing i said. It was too early to tell which way it would have went.

5-10% odds of some tropical rain symptoms at the edge of Alabama, followed by the weather people reporting it as 0% following that. 

It wasn't going to be of any danger to Alabama even in the earlier models. 

Also all of those images you're posting now can be found in Trump's tweets. Same source i mentioned earlier. The NHC. 

Do you understand what she's trying to express with these map graphics, or did you just see "Hey, familiar looking maps"? 

Turncoat doesn't seem to grasp the fact Trump did report those very updates, and Alabama "WAS" potentially in danger. The thing is CNN wants to edit and report everything from September 1st which is obsolete forcasting even to Trump. 

...we're literally looking at his refusal to correct false information, and the map Alena's showing has a disclaimer that says to disregard it in favor of more accurate data, which he was then given and called "Fake News". 

You aren't even arguing with our points now. 

Also lol at Photoshopped images by bad Orange man.

He can't photoshop, hence why he used a sharpie (that and/or time constraints). Someone else in his department was able to do it for him as an afterthought, and even that's just raising the contrast to make the low odds lines more jarring. 

Dude. The forecast for hurricanes are subject to change.

- Alabama was a potential path. 

- Trump tweeted hurricane forcasts.

- The weather people tweeted the same thing as Trump

- Some media tweeted updated information in argument with Trump which is a retarded thing to do. Such as the Sept 1st announcements. 

- Trump was asked about old tweets days later. He replied showing the old data explaining how it turned right instead and that was edited and criticized by biased pannel brainwashing you.

Its all in the video you opened with. The one you yourself never paid attention to.

Spatial Mind said: 

Dude. The forecast for hurricanes are subject to change.

- Alabama was a potential path. 

Yes, and he didn't change with the updates. 

- Trump tweeted hurricane forcasts.

He retweeted cherrypicked, outdated maps. 

- The weather people tweeted the same thing as Trump

Which weather people, Fox's? 

- Some media tweeted updated information in argument with Trump which is a retarded thing to do. Such as the Sept 1st announcements. 

I don't think I'm understanding the sentence. Are you saying it's retarded to argue with Trump in the form of a tweet? 

- Trump was asked about old tweets days later. He replied showing the old data explaining how it turned right instead and that was edited and criticized by biased pannel brainwashing you.

Show me the unedited footage? 

Honestly, with how much I debate The Left on Facebook, you'd be doing me a favor here if you show your truth to be the case undeniably. 

Its all in the video you opened with. The one you yourself never paid attention to.

...are you watching a different video? 

I mean I can tell you're still confused over the whole "map" thing, but what else is throwing you for a loop? 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Dude. The forecast for hurricanes are subject to change.

- Alabama was a potential path. 

Yes, and he didn't change with the updates. 

He did change with updates. It's on his twitter. I posted the link, which goes to show your entire evaluation of this is based on faith and ignorance.

- Trump tweeted hurricane forcasts.

He retweeted cherrypicked, outdated maps. 

This contradicts your last paragraph.

He tweeted Maps generated by the NHC. Same people who posted the maps Alena posted, and it did it for every release in his twitter on the day of their release. It's all still there.

- The weather people tweeted the same thing as Trump

Which weather people, Fox's? 

For the millionth time, the National Hurricane Center. The source of the maps everyone is going by.

- Some media tweeted updated information in argument with Trump which is a retarded thing to do. Such as the Sept 1st announcements. 

I don't think I'm understanding the sentence. Are you saying it's retarded to argue with Trump in the form of a tweet? 

On September 1st, It's retarded to come back later in the day when the data updates and argue with Trump based on information both sides had earlier in the day.

The President posts a hurricane update. Is this not okay ? Then the data changes on the same day, and someone comes out swinging at him. 

- Trump was asked about old tweets days later. He replied showing the old data explaining how it turned right instead and that was edited and criticized by biased pannel brainwashing you.

Show me the unedited footage? 

Honestly, with how much I debate The Left on Facebook, you'd be doing me a favor here if you show your truth to be the case undeniably. 

He was asked about the old map twice. And It's CNN, I'm not even going to bother trying to find the footage. And when you come at me saying "your truth" I honestly can't take you seriously. Delusion is a thing Nate.

Its all in the video you opened with. The one you yourself never paid attention to.

...are you watching a different video? 

I mean I can tell you're still confused over the whole "map" thing, but what else is throwing you for a loop? 

 In YOUR video. Trump says "This is the original map, we thought it was going to go straight BUT IT TURNED RIGHT" He said something along those lines clear as day. ( You literally don't know this fact about the video ) But your CNN panel has you saying he's arguing.

In your video Trump was asked again about the old map. He said he was an old map and moved on from it.

CNN is calling an Apple and Orange, and you're nodding along with it.

Also the sharpie mark is not important. And you believe Trump photoshopped the map. That is insane Nathan.

.

.

.

You know what intrigues me. The Lord hates stupid people and advises us to cut them off. In a time of judgement all will be revealed and the foolish will be quite familiar with themselves.

I had a strong sensation to write that last paragraph.  

...wow you really refuse to see that he could do anything wrong. It's multiple topics of this now. 

Like shit, even people I like I see flaws in. 

Just as expected Nate. 

That is all.

Spatial Mind said: 

Just as expected Nate. 

That is all.

How much did you even gain from this conversation when it'd come to seeing another perspective, just more bipartisan BS? 

I'd continue but you're essentially repeating yourself with your head buried in the sand. What's the point of throwing new data at you if you'll just repeat yourself and rebuke anything against the grain as "programming"? 

Do you think "programming" is the only reason to not like Trump? 

What I gained is simply knowledge about you. 

By the way. People can read this and see you.

Spatial Mind said: 

What I gained is simply knowledge about you. 

By the way. People can read this and see you.

I'm not hiding this at all..? I made this topic. 

You just keep repeating the same stuff instead of actually looking, I don't know how to proceed with you. 

Actually looking for what ? Evidence of Trump photoshopping weather maps ?

Have your last say is you wish.