WAR ON WIND
I stopped finding his shenanigans funny tbh
I've been following since before he became president.
Terrible presidential choice, hilarious brand name. Our president is a registered wrestler for the WWE for pete's sake, tried to sell his own set of Steaks, From The Desk of Donald Trump was absurd, he has his own Board Game, he had his own reality show where he got to sit like a king and say hilarious dialogue and fire people, he had Rudy Giuliani act odd and hammy in a dress, he switched parties for this election purely over his opposition to the former presidents mockery of him, his connections with Russia can be seen in young age interviews, his interview on 60 Minutes basically has him slip his connections with The Russians being the case to "protect himself from Chinese Hackers" like it's some sort of equalizer (around the time he was hating on the Electoral College), his commercials from his more youthful prime were absolute gold, there was Trump University bombing in the way Trump-Brand delegation tends to tank it, there was the time he POWER FLEXED the Saturday Night Live people into servitude, has his name plastered in gigantic golden letters, HIS TWITTER ALONE is so much self-harm.
He's a gigantic fucking joke, and somehow he became president. This isn't even close to a fourth of my following of this dude. I've been sitting here as a media person just jaded as fuck to him being president from already being fairly familiar with him as a fan of the spectacles he makes.
He's displayed himself as such a joke to me that I began fearing Pence taking over from him seeming like a proper fall guy, especially once Roger Stone was out of the picture. Pence's history is something worth looking into, while Trump's is popcorn.
I still can't decide if Trump is a genius or an accidental genius.
He says a lot of stupid bullshit, but he knows how to say it.
There's actually youtube videos that analyze how that happens:
He's also the classic narc advantage coasting on raw, ego driven Dunning Krugger fallacy. His method can only work as long as the illusion never breaks, and he's too forgetful to hold onto what would otherwise mill a normal person with functional retention down. He however with presidential pressures is showing an unprecedented level of pressure he's not had to carry otherwise, and it's starting to tear down his method as his ego mills gradually with it. He's resorting to overstimulated "I-don't-know-I-don't-know" reactions to deflect.
Astrologically speaking as well for people like Spatial... he's an awful combo.
I still can't decide if Trump is a genius or an accidental genius.
He says a lot of stupid bullshit, but he knows how to say it.
There's actually youtube videos that analyze how that happens:
He's also the classic narc advantage coasting on raw, ego driven Dunning Krugger fallacy.
Yes, but his entire persona is perfect for the current political climate to win the elections.
He is an anti-politician and people were getting tired of empty promises and the same old fakeness of politicians.
His outward passion, impulsive tweets, politically incorrect and unapologetic statements make him seem fearless and powerful, more human. Being more human connects him to the crowds. His power makes people trust that he will do a real change, not just empty promises.
I've realized that politics have always been about manipulation and appearances, not about truths and policies(even at times of hardship, you can use truths and policies to manipulate instead of being truthful). Especially on the bigger scale. They may differ when the audience is smaller, but in the bigger picture, you want to manipulate the masses, as they are simple. In smaller circles, they may not be so simple or may need a different approach.
And in the current situation in America, he did the right things to get elected. Ofc his opposition was shit, but anyone can be president, technically, so it's a null point. What matters is the outcome.
Good said:He is an anti-politician and people were getting tired of empty promises and the same old fakeness of politicians.
What a racket though. Buisiness is already shaking hands with our government, all having a business man in there does is speed it up.
A lot of what makes politicians more fake is specifically business interests. It's a bamboozling contradiction to try to call him "change".
His outward passion, impulsive tweets, politically incorrect and unapologetic statements make him seem fearless and powerful, more human.
It's been fun to watch his more panicky moments, plus the presidency seems to be wearing him down.
I've realized that politics have always been about manipulation and appearances, not about truths and policies
Superpacs and other media at the last minute is basically just trying to brew and steer hysteria until people can sign their name away while amidst an intoxicating set of emotional ideas.
Having elections in The Fall is in itself a bit of a sick joke, as it's when people are the most fearful and frantic. It's almost as crazy a plan as "Black Friday".
And in the current situation in America, he did the right things to get elected. Ofc his opposition was shit, but anyone can be president, technically, so it's a null point. What matters is the outcome.
Seems to matter even more than the popular vote.
He was updating the forecast from the original. He straight up said the hurricane instead turned right, and he said the people in Alabama will be okay, so no cause for alarm.
The footage by itself is enough without the spoonfed leftism, and his tweets and former history don't help.
The footage was edited and focused on the part where he pointed out "the original projected course" of the hurricane. He also dismissed it and said how instead Dorian went right instead of left.
If you paid attention to what Trump said you would know this. But you're thinking what CNN wants you to think. Wake up.
It's our president arguing with wind, something I can recall him doing around... what, three or four times now I think?
He is not arguing, they are asking him about the old data in the press conference, and he basically said Alabama is okay. Again he stated how the hurricane ended up going right instead of left. The rest of the footage was left out so CNN can make this about a lol sharpie circled around Alabama's shoreline.
CNN programming is programming you.
What is your explanation for how often he covers himself with "I don't know" in a flustered mess?
Hold on. What is your excuse for what I just pointed out to you ? And why is Trump saying "I don't know" now a thing when your original protocol was to insist he was doubling down on early data with a sharpie ? That's a no win situation going on in your program.
He was updating the forecast from the original. He straight up said the hurricane instead turned right, and he said the people in Alabama will be okay, so no cause for alarm.
The footage by itself is enough without the spoonfed leftism, and his tweets and former history don't help.
The footage was edited and focused on the part where he pointed out "the original projected course" of the hurricane. He also dismissed it and said how instead Dorian went right instead of left.
If you paid attention to what Trump said you would know this. But you're thinking what CNN wants you to think. Wake up.
You're really in deep, aren't you?
I'm not even a leftist, and if Trump had stuck to his original politics and ran for the Democrats and ended up winning I'd still be proclaiming it's madness after his history with the media spectacle, business failures, and debts.
It's our president arguing with wind, something I can recall him doing around... what, three or four times now I think?
He is not arguing, they are asking him about the old data in the press conference, and he basically said Alabama is okay. Again he stated how the hurricane ended up going right instead of left. The rest of the footage was left out so CNN can make this about a lol sharpie circled around Alabama's shoreline.
...so you didn't see his Tweets and former statements?
I figured you'd be following his tweets religiously.
CNN programming is programming you.
What is your explanation for how often he covers himself with "I don't know" in a flustered mess?
Hold on. What is your excuse for what I just pointed out to you ? And why is Trump saying "I don't know" now a thing when your original protocol was to insist he was doubling down on early data with a sharpie ?
It's in the same video (as a repeat of theme from other more resent flusters), did you even watch the entire thing?
That's a no win situation going on in your program.
Yet you're the one who'd defend him to your dying breath. You can't even visit the notion of him having done much wrong, always armed with an excuse for him.
How am I the programmed one when you're the one who's blatantly seeing this as a bipartisan issue instead of a matter of the president himself independent of parties?