Sociopath Community

Gypsy said: 

 What the actual fuck… so this housemate:

• talked shit about everyone behind their backs
• was domineering and bribed you to wash his car to kinda humiliate you
• hit on every woman you brought back to the house
• played loud movies at 3am 
• used up all the internet data 
• harassed anyone taking longer than 10 minutes in the bathroom 
• didn’t pitch in for toilet paper
• stole from you

That’s not a ‘frenemy’, that’s an awful person basically just bullying you. It’s one thing taking the high road and not resorting to pettiness, but what did you actually do to stick up for yourself in this situation? Think I’d have either moved out within a week or be serving whatever the Canadian sentence is for first degree murder for the loud movie thing alone. This kinda comes back to the other thread when you were saying about the woman who messed you around. Even though you sometimes come off as an awful person here, it sounds like irl you are weirdly too nice 

There are some holes in this characterization. SM said the guy knocked on him after he was in the bathroom, but he never said how long he had actually been in there. The “harassed anyone taking longer than 10 minutes in the bathroom” detail is therefore an assumption you've added to his account.

SM is also hardly above “talking shit behind people's backs” himself, considering the Napoleon-complex assumption and calling the guy a movie freak. The car thing is more complicated than simply calling it a bribe to humiliate him, especially given SM's own stated admiration for wealth and the power that comes with it.

Likewise, complaining about the guy hitting on women he brought home seems inconsistent with SM's own tendency to comment on other people's private sexual behavior and orientation. The situation may have been unpleasant, but you're accepting SM's framing almost completely and then building a personality judgment on top of it.

Gypsy said: 

 What the actual fuck… so this housemate:

• talked shit about everyone behind their backs
• was domineering and bribed you to wash his car to kinda humiliate you
• hit on every woman you brought back to the house
• played loud movies at 3am 
• used up all the internet data 
• harassed anyone taking longer than 10 minutes in the bathroom 
• didn’t pitch in for toilet paper
• stole from you

that’s not a ‘frenemy’, that’s an awful person basically just bullying you. 

Domineering yes, but never bribed me to wash his car, I never say no to fast money, Can't remember if it was 10 or 15 bucks per wash. What was bad was how he'd posture himself and supervise, critique the job and tilt his head when it was time to fork over the cash. $10 in 15-20 minutes, not too many people make that kind of money,

I said dude, if you don't want streak marks get a shammy. He knew nothing of this and thought I could use a J cloth for a better finish. Eventually he got synthetic shammy which was cheaper, and I'd use that.

.

EDIT: Another thing. Doing some kind of work in public unlocks our ability to attract others. A stranger is passing along and a simple smile turns into a greeting. Not sure what it is. I'm busying working and find the time to smile and nod, and the stranger lights up and has something to say and it's a nice moment. Just don't stop working and talk and look back at them while scrubbing away. It was a small suburban area smack in the city, so I met a lot of people and had adorable moments while washing his car and getting paid. All of which would've been his, meanwhile he's paying me then I'm gonna go get some cheap chinky food down the street all delighted with the spare change jingling away in my pocket.

. 

The toilet paper, we'd take turns buying. But then it turned into him leading the other guy to pitch in and those 2 buy, then it's my turn again, then them, then me again and I noticed when I supplied it, it would run out much faster. So I was supplying the most toilet paper. 

it’s one thing taking the high road and not resorting to pettiness, but what did you actually do to stick up for yourself in this situation? 

Nothing. Not reacting to people's bullshit causes their deeds to backfire in ways that make them double down before they realize they've been observed. If anything he was getting more frustrated and in the process he ended up digging his own grave then finding walls of shame. 

think I’d have either moved out within a week or be serving whatever the Canadian sentence is for first degree murder for the loud movie thing alone. 

He's also somewhat an intellectual so if his behavior made you cringe, imagine how he feels about it.  I did move, even though I was madly in love with the woman right next door. lol Hope this shit never happens to me again and if it does it better be a good one. 

Last time I met up with him, he was falling apart, running out of money, no work, while I was on the upslope surrounded by millionaires showing me thy ways. The late CEO of Tridel lived 2 stories above me in fancyland. We talked about it while having lunch, knowing him it was his way of testing how I'm doing, expensive place. It was there we exchanged how things are going for us and he said it himself "Wow, it's nice when people love you"

this kinda comes back to the other thread when you were saying about the woman who messed you around. Even though you sometimes come off as an awful person here, it sounds like irl you are weirdly too nice 

 Correct.

I'm empathic in ways you wouldn't believe. This entails picking up on bad energy too, so when I come across as an awful person in here, I'm returning the energy. Take Dragoon for example. Annoying right. It'll be a matter of time before you start to get a bit cunty while dealing with his foolery, just the same If you walk in on me talking to him, I'll totally come across as a complete asshole. I do give him the time of day cause I'm tolerant but there's always the accumulation so before I cut him loose I'll give him a dose of something pure and true served cold. 

I also gave you few uppercuts in the past too, but it wasn't exactly out of the blue ^^ It's always based on conditioning and conditions. By the way, I'm really curious to know what you look like after all these years, show me please. 

Another thing, I like to call out people's sexuality because it's not something myself or anyone cares about, so making a big deal about it is comedic, especially if saying homosexual offends a homosexual when it shouldn't, so yes I can have fun at someone's expense while being happy for them when little things don't bother them. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Nothing. Not reacting to people's bullshit causes their deeds to backfire in ways that make them double down before they realize they've been observed. If anything he was getting more frustrated and in the process he ended up digging his own grave then finding walls of shame. 

Another thing, I like to call out people's sexuality because it's not something myself or anyone cares about, so making a big deal about it is comedic, especially if saying homosexual offends a homosexual when it shouldn't, so yes I can have fun at someone's expense while being happy for them when little things don't bother them. 

“Not reacting” sounds rather convenient as a description of what you were doing. You're attributing a whole causal strategy to it: that your lack of reaction made him escalate, reveal himself, and eventually “dig his own grave.” But how do you actually know that? It sounds like you're retrospectively framing your own behavior as a deliberate tactic rather than simply not confronting him. And if the point is that you were deliberately withholding reactions because you knew it would frustrate him and make him expose himself, that's not really passive nonreaction anymore. It's a form of psychological strategy. Calling it simply “not reacting” obscures what you're actually describing.

This also seems inconsistent with your broader views. You've said you don't particularly care about inequalities affecting other people, while also expressing admiration for heterosexuality and contempt for other sexualities. So why is another man sleeping with the women you bring home something you object to? By your own stated standards, that should be irrelevant to you at best, and something to admire at worst. You're applying a strangely selective standard to heterosexual behavior.

Spatial Mind said:

I'm empathic in ways you wouldn't believe. This entails picking up on bad energy too, so when I come across as an awful person in here, I'm returning the energy. Take Dragoon for example. Annoying right. It'll be a matter of time before you start to get a bit cunty while dealing with his foolery, just the same If you walk in on me talking to him, I'll totally come across as a complete asshole. I do give him the time of day cause I'm tolerant but there's always the accumulation so before I cut him loose I'll give him a dose of something pure and true served cold.

"I'm empathic in ways you wouldn't believe" is a strange claim. Picking up on "bad energy" is a perception of how someone makes you feel, not evidence of empathy. Then saying that when you appear awful you're merely "returning the energy" gives you a convenient caveat for explaining away your own behavior. The "in ways you wouldn't believe" part also adds theatricality without actually demonstrating anything. 

You calling me foolish is ironic when your worldview relies on an assumed "greater good" that you expect others to accept, while you routinely deride, humiliate, and shame people who don't conform to it. That can make people more foolish by encouraging them to treat your value judgments as objective truths instead of questioning their assumptions.

A nihilistic position can be more logically cautious because it doesn't assume there is an objectively defined "greater good" everyone ought to pursue. Human values and preferences are products of cognition, not automatically universal truths. So calling me foolish for rejecting your framework doesn't establish that I'm foolish. It only shows that you treat your own values as self-evident.

Dragoonback said: 

“Not reacting” sounds rather convenient as a description of what you were doing. You're attributing a whole causal strategy to it: that your lack of reaction made him escalate, reveal himself, and eventually “dig his own grave.” But how do you actually know that? It sounds like you're retrospectively framing your own behavior as a deliberate tactic rather than simply not confronting him. And if the point is that you were deliberately withholding reactions because you knew it would frustrate him and make him expose himself, that's not really passive nonreaction anymore. It's a form of psychological strategy. Calling it simply “not reacting” obscures what you're actually describing.

When people take a swing and it does nothing. It impacts them. When they swing it's because they want you to react. This was coming from someone who thought they were smarter than me. It's not my fault if his ego got shattered. 

If I were to appease you, what action should I have taken ? Should I have cried ? Maybe start yelling to generate some kind of entanglement giving the abuser leverage to start gaslighting me ?

You remember we had this talk before ? How I don't need to kick your ass ?

It's the least I can do for myself.

This also seems inconsistent with your broader views. You've said you don't particularly care about inequalities affecting other people, while also expressing admiration for heterosexuality and contempt for other sexualities. So why is another man sleeping with the women you bring home something you object to?

Contempt is such a harsh word. Humored is more like it. 

Now if I bring a woman home, and a housemate banged her, me not liking that would have nothing to do with contempt for other sexualities, or my indifference toward inequalities affecting other people or whatever you said. 

My love next door came over, we were sitting down at the table and buddy came running up, grabbed her by the shoulders and started shaking her up "HOW ARE YOU DOING !?" then walked away.

In my opinion it was a sad cry to steal attention, maybe let her feel how strong he is, plus he knows I like her. As for her, she never liked it very much, she's quite small and delicate, like what did he want her to do, turn around and start playing with him ? Maybe get all touchy feely and end up on the floor together ?

It was awkward.  

lol You're gonna twist this somehow, but honestly, what I wrote is the truth, and no one in their right mind will think what buddy did is okay.

By your own stated standards, that should be irrelevant to you at best, and something to admire at worst. You're applying a strangely selective standard to heterosexual behavior.

It is irrelevant. I never brought home a woman then a housemate fucked her.

I also mentioned my relationship with my GF fizzled. lol ahhh God. She posts video footage of these horses she took, and the other guy is all "how come I wasn't invited". I felt no way about it. My sentiment is: Good luck man, she comes with a $200,000 plus debt and a lot of that is interest. 

Still if I say come, she'll come. I stopped giving her money and things started to crack. Told her to file for bankruptcy but nay. She's rather the man pay it off.

I'm thinking damn. What's better.....

- Her filing for bankruptcy and the ":same money" distributed by the man can go toward HER new shit, new car, fucking vacations, a place etc, then after 7 years she can start building credit again

or

- 200k plus...of my money.... to make her debt go away. 

Like damn lady you could've had it handled WITH GAINS and it might've even be cheaper for me. but instead I'm supposed to cover that. 

Yeah I totally feel no way if she's doing what she has to do. My heart was stolen by someone else so I settled. That other guy seems loaded too. Seems to sell food trucks for a living so maybe his wealth is an illusion. She doesn't know I know, but I know. Which brings me back to the do nothing mechanism. I never had to anything to know, it's done for me. This happens just about every time people monkey branch or cheat, the other person always finds out in some way. It's too Godly for an atheist to believe but even they see how this plays out in life. 

It's okay, we had our fun, and we're still good.

I also understand. Ass can't be free, especially a nice ass in over their head in debt that wants to do things their way.

So maybe, if I bring a woman home and a housemate fucked her ( irrelevant ), I won't be as upset unless it was, the one.

Spatial Mind said:

I'm empathic in ways you wouldn't believe. This entails picking up on bad energy too, so when I come across as an awful person in here, I'm returning the energy. Take Dragoon for example. Annoying right. It'll be a matter of time before you start to get a bit cunty while dealing with his foolery, just the same If you walk in on me talking to him, I'll totally come across as a complete asshole. I do give him the time of day cause I'm tolerant but there's always the accumulation so before I cut him loose I'll give him a dose of something pure and true served cold.

"I'm empathic in ways you wouldn't believe" is a strange claim. Picking up on "bad energy" is a perception of how someone makes you feel, not evidence of empathy. Then saying that when you appear awful you're merely "returning the energy" gives you a convenient caveat for explaining away your own behavior. The "in ways you wouldn't believe" part also adds theatricality without actually demonstrating anything. 

There's no way to demonstrate this, like how would that even be possible you moron, but I've consistently spoke about it. It's in my back and can get quite painful.

There is a link between stress and back pain. Mine is a firm muscle I have no control over and it really fucks with my nerves to a point it feels like a needle is piercing through my back, through the heart and through the chest.

Things like disgust triggers this. To me bad behavior is a physical attack. The one spot between my left shoulder blade and spine is an area I cannot reach by hand, so the only way to relieve it is to take something and lay on it and grind away. Sometimes I'll grind the area on the corner of a wall, and the relief is better than penile stimulation.

Oh yes when someone manages to upset me, it's metered, and depending on how high that meter it really pushes me to react/unload to what's fucking with it. I call "it" a bullshit detector.

I can make a list of behaviors that trigger this both positive and negative, all behavior is emotional and I experience it on a deep emotional level by force, and why ? Because after decades of this I have emotions metered.

At the same time pleasant energies impact me too and these are associated with positivity and very soothing.  

If I weren't what I claim to be, I would've have people like you gunning for me. I call you the damned ones.

You calling me foolish is ironic when your worldview relies on an assumed "greater good" that you expect others to accept, while you routinely deride, humiliate, and shame people who don't conform to it. That can make people more foolish by encouraging them to treat your value judgments as objective truths instead of questioning their assumptions.

False. The world is clearly not aligned with my idea of the greater good. I'm the one people ask "how could you stand, how can you tolerate, I would've done this"

What it is. You know my perspective and you get a sense of shame or tend to get defensive simply for knowing a little bit of what I think. It makes you feel better to say that I expect others to accept my worldview.

Still in my opinion my worldview is functional, while your views long for the oblivion of the species, and if we so happen to have souls, you'd want that obliterated to.  Yes you are lame. 

A nihilistic position can be more logically cautious becau/

 /I don't care about that nihilism shit. Its good if you lack sense. I have the nihilism program too, but it pales in comparison to my other gifts. ( I call them gifts, cause you make me realize how blessed I am. You may refer to my so called gifts as additional attribute you lack, cannot experience and will never know )

Spatial Mind said:

When people take a swing and it does nothing, it impacts them because they want a reaction. This was coming from someone who thought he was smarter than me, so it's not my fault if his ego got shattered. What was I supposed to do, cry or start yelling and give an abuser leverage to gaslight me? I don't need to kick someone's ass, and not reacting is the least I can do for myself. As for the woman, if a housemate slept with a woman I brought home, that would be irrelevant to me unless she was someone I actually cared about. What bothered me was him running up to a woman I liked, grabbing her by the shoulders, and shaking her while shouting at her, which I saw as an attempt to steal attention or demonstrate how strong he was, especially because he knew I liked her. She didn't seem to like it either. My relationship with my girlfriend eventually fizzled, and I didn't care when another man showed interest in her. I stopped giving her money because she refused to deal with her $200,000+ debt through bankruptcy, and I figured she could handle her own choices. I also believe people who cheat or monkey-branch eventually find out what happened without me having to do anything. As for empathy, there is no way to demonstrate something like that, but I consistently experience other people's behavior physically. Stress and disgust can produce severe tension and pain in my back, and I experience negative behavior almost like a physical attack. I have a kind of emotional meter or “bullshit detector” that reacts to different behaviors, both positively and negatively. Pleasant behavior can produce the opposite effect and feel soothing. If I weren't what I claim to be, I wouldn't have people reacting so strongly to me. I also don't care about nihilism as a worldview; I have it as one perspective, but it pales in comparison to what I consider my other gifts or attributes, which I regard as things other people lack or cannot experience.

A lot of this seems to rely on treating your own subjective reactions as evidence for the conclusions you draw from them. “Not reacting” supposedly caused him to escalate and expose himself, but that's an interpretation of events rather than something you've established. Likewise, experiencing a strong physical reaction to behavior doesn't demonstrate empathy or that your “bullshit detector” accurately detects other people's motives. It demonstrates that certain behavior produces a strong reaction in you.

The same issue appears with the “gifts” argument. You experience something intensely, interpret it as a special attribute, and then use that attribute to validate your interpretation of other people. That makes the framework largely self-confirming. The nihilism point has the same problem. You said you have “the nihilism program” as a worldview, not merely some nihilistic ideas, but nihilism isn't an intellectual accessory you can possess alongside your other “gifts.” It is a position about the absence of objective meaning, value, and purpose. Talking about a “greater good,” being “blessed” with superior attributes, and your worldview being functionally superior is not consistent with simply claiming nihilism as another worldview you possess. Calling another person's nihilism destructive doesn't resolve that contradiction. It just replaces an argument with a value judgment.

Dragoonback said: 

A lot of this seems to rely on treating your own subjective reactions as evidence for the conclusions you draw from them. “Not reacting” supposedly caused him to escalate and expose himself, but that's an interpretation of events rather than something you've established. Likewise, experiencing a strong physical reaction to behavior doesn't demonstrate empathy or that your “bullshit detector” accurately detects other people's motives. It demonstrates that certain behavior produces a strong reaction in you.

The same issue appears with the “gifts” argument. You experience something intensely, interpret it as a special attribute, and then use that attribute to validate your interpretation of other people. That makes the framework largely self-confirming. The nihilism point has the same problem. You said you have “the nihilism program” as a worldview, not merely some nihilistic ideas, but nihilism isn't an intellectual accessory you can possess alongside your other “gifts.” It is a position about the absence of objective meaning, value, and purpose. Talking about a “greater good,” being “blessed” with superior attributes, and your worldview being functionally superior is not consistent with simply claiming nihilism as another worldview you possess. Calling another person's nihilism destructive doesn't resolve that contradiction. It just replaces an argument with a value judgment.

 That's your take and conclusion. 

Mr. Roboto this guy over here is filled with endless doubt and skepticism with absolutely everything said to him and is very argumentative....

Gemini said:

"People who doubt everything others say usually do so as a psychological defense mechanism, out of deep-seated insecurity, or due to a cognitive bias known as chronic cynicism. This relentless skepticism often has less to do with the truthfulness of your words and more to do with their own internal worldview, past experiences, or mental habits."

 Oh yes. This guy is very insecure. Always crying about the same things over and over again. Capitalism is the enemy, conservatives are the enemy. Wants to stop children from being born out of his own misery.

What else ?

Gemini said:

Psychological Drivers of Total Distrust

- Cynicism as a Shield: Many hyper-skeptical people suffer from chronic cynicism, a mindset where you assume everyone is driven purely by selfishness or greed. According to insights published in Psychology Today, people use cynicism as a defense mechanism to avoid being blindsided, disappointed, or played for a fool.

 True. You do assume everyone is driven by selfishness or greed. Like.... Dude. I write about taking abuse and I stayed chill. And you're making me out to be the bad guy. Yeah I let him dig his own grave, I can't stop the man from being a dick. It's his fault. 

Gemini said:

- Projection of Insecurity: People often project their own internal deception onto others. If someone frequently exaggerates, cuts corners, or distorts facts, they naturally assume that everyone else operates the exact same way

 Yep. I called you out on that not too long ago. I told you I can see you, but you don't think I can. You're crystal clear to me. This is probably why you think I have the capacity to dox out personal information, cause how you really are is personal, but dude, if you put it on display the way you do, of course I'm going to call it out.  

You're dealing with someone who fears God. If you let that sink in, you might realize I'm not the kind of man to operate on low frequencies because I KNOW, I'm being monitored by the divine. 

Gemini said:

- The "Need to Be Right": Some individuals are temperamentally contrarian. They automatically challenge statements because tearing down someone else's claim makes them feel intellectually superior or gives them a sense of control over the conversation.

 I honestly think you're having an OCD episode. For maybe a month now this new you has been fucking up and you're doing it to everyone you talk to. None of this is surprising me tbh. Been calling it out. 

I'm using Ai cause you can't possibly take it from me

Gemini said:

- Past Betrayal and Trauma: If a person was raised by highly untrustworthy caregivers or survived severe professional or personal betrayals, their brain adapts by treating all incoming information as a potential lie.

 Accurate again. You were an orphan and your caregivers most likely did their darndest not to form an attachment to you. 

Remember when you were the old you ? Maybe last year I said, dude. I understand. Your life is fucked up. I tried to be nice. 

Gemini said:

- Cognitive Bias and Echo Chambers: People filter information through their existing belief systems. If what you say contradicts their worldview or political leaning, their brain will aggressively look for reasons to dismiss your statement entirely.

 Once again, the technology has impressed. That's fucking on point.

Gemini said:

The Social and Physical Cost

While these individuals think their intense doubt keeps them safe, psychological research proves it does the opposite. Stanford University's Social Neuroscience Lab notes that cynicism is rising sharply, yet chronic doubters are statistically more prone to loneliness, depression, and fractured relationships. Their suspicion creates a self-fulfilling prophecy: by treating people with constant distrust, they alienate others and push them away, which they then use to "prove" that people cannot be trusted.

 Self inflicted suffering. Called it.

Goon. When I say you're a jackass, I'm not trying to offend you. You so are. Yes it seems magical to you that I was able to observe you and have you all figured out, and here I am now using the machine and I'm not surprised, but rather impressed with it.  I did not learn anything here. Sounds like boasting but it's true. 

I cannot take you seriously. You are having an episode. If I break your ass it's for your own good. Find a better way, that way is weak. You want the species to end cause the species will end you for being a dumbass. You pierce yourself. 

I know you're an atheist, but if you so much as pretend you're under the looking glass, and stick to it, your life will improve, cause while you think everyone is shallow, you'll seek out to level the playing field. It's bad when you're shallow cause if your intelligence level. It's like watching a child up to no good thinking the adults have no idea what they're up to. 

Spatial Mind said:

That's your take and conclusion. Mr. Roboto over here is filled with endless doubt and skepticism about absolutely everything and is very argumentative. Gemini says people who doubt everything others say usually do so as a psychological defense mechanism, insecurity, or chronic cynicism, and that hyper-skeptical people may use cynicism as a shield to avoid being blindsided or disappointed. Oh yes, this guy is very insecure, always crying about the same things over and over again, saying capitalism and conservatives are the enemy, and wanting to stop children from being born out of his own misery. You do assume everyone is driven by selfishness or greed. I write about taking abuse and stayed chill, and you're making me out to be the bad guy. I let him dig his own grave and can't stop him from being a dick, so it's his fault. Gemini also says people project their own insecurity onto others, and I called you out on that before. I can see you, but you don't think I can. You're crystal clear to me. This is probably why you think I have the capacity to dox personal information, because how you really are is personal, but if you put it on display the way you do, of course I'm going to call it out. You're dealing with someone who fears God, and if you let that sink in, you might realize I'm not the kind of man to operate on low frequencies because I know I'm being monitored by the divine. Gemini also says some people have a need to be right and automatically challenge statements because it makes them feel intellectually superior or gives them control over the conversation. I honestly think you're having an OCD episode. For maybe a month now this new you has been fucking up and you're doing it to everyone you talk to. None of this surprises me because I've been calling it out. I'm using AI because you can't possibly take it from me. Gemini says past betrayal or trauma can cause people to treat incoming information as potential lies. Accurate again. You were an orphan and your caregivers most likely did their darndest not to form an attachment to you. Remember when you were the old you? Maybe last year I said I understood and that your life was fucked up, and I tried to be nice. Gemini also says people filter information through existing beliefs and aggressively dismiss things that contradict their worldview or political leaning. Once again, the technology has impressed. That's fucking on point. Gemini says chronic cynicism and suspicion can create self-inflicted suffering by alienating people and then using that alienation as evidence that people cannot be trusted. Self-inflicted suffering. When I call you a jackass, I'm not trying to offend you. You are one. It seems magical to you that I was able to observe you and have you figured out, and now I'm using the machine and I'm not surprised but impressed with it. I didn't learn anything here. It sounds like boasting, but it's true. I cannot take you seriously. You're having an episode. If I break your ass, it's for your own good. Find a better way, because that way is weak. You want the species to end because the species will end you for being a dumbass. You pierce yourself. I know you're an atheist, but if you pretend you're under the looking glass and stick to it, your life will improve. While you think everyone is shallow, you'll seek to level the playing field. It's bad when you're shallow because of your intelligence. It's like watching a child up to no good while thinking the adults have no idea what they're doing.

This doesn't really address anything I said. You responded to an argument about the logic of your claims by constructing a psychological explanation for why I supposedly make arguments you dislike, then using generic AI descriptions to confirm that explanation. That's circular. You criticize me for skepticism while accepting every description that supports your preexisting view of me, without establishing that insecurity, projection, trauma, contrarianism, or anything else actually explains my arguments. “I can see you” and “I have you figured out” aren't evidence of that either. And nothing here addresses the actual contradictions I pointed out about your “bullshit detector,” your claimed empathy, or your description of nihilism as a worldview you possess alongside a greater good and supposedly superior gifts. You haven't refuted those arguments, you've just replaced them with assertions about my psychology.

You also keep introducing violence into these arguments while simultaneously framing yourself as the person merely responding to other people's aggression. “If I break your ass it's for your own good” is another example of that. You can characterize it as expressive if you want, but it's still you introducing physical violence into the exchange. That becomes especially noticeable when you repeatedly describe other people as the aggressive or abusive ones while your own references to violence are framed as justified reactions, lessons, or something being done “for their own good.”

You saying that I assume everyone is driven by “selfishness and greed” is also strange because I rarely even frame my arguments in those terms. You're importing a moral framework onto what I'm actually saying. I point out that people are individual organisms with their own brains, interests, and experiences, and that treating “selfishness” as some inherent moral defect can become a convenient framework for justifying hierarchical or exploitative arrangements. It can obscure the fact that there isn't some abstract collective organism called “society” experiencing things from a unified perspective. There are individual organisms, each experiencing existence from their own nervous system. Ironically, you also seem to celebrate forms of behavior that could conventionally be described as greed or self-interest, while condemning me for supposedly reducing everything to those concepts. So you're projecting a moral framework onto my position while applying it inconsistently yourself.

There's also some intelligence-shaming buried in your response. You've repeatedly called me unintelligent and used slurs toward me, yet now you're constructing a “bad” form of intelligence by saying it's bad to be shallow “because of your intelligence,” while implicitly positioning your own intelligence as the kind that sees through people. Then you assume that because I supposedly think everyone is shallow, I would “seek to level the playing field.” That's another projection from your own hierarchy-centered framework rather than something I've argued. You're the one repeatedly describing people in terms of relative intelligence, superiority, adults versus children, and who supposedly sees through whom. “It's like watching a child up to no good while thinking the adults have no idea what they're doing” is practically an explicit hierarchy. You're treating life as a playing field where certain exceptional people occupy the higher positions and others are beneath them, then projecting that framework onto me by assuming I want to “level” it. If anything, your own rhetoric is much more concerned with establishing and maintaining those distinctions than mine is.

It doesn't have to address anything you've said. Especially while you're not being taken seriously. 

I was right, the Ai is right. Nothing to prove. 

Sorry I can only respond to the first sentence when it comes to you at this point. I can only make you worse. 

Spatial Mind said: 

It doesn't have to address anything you've said. Especially while you're not being taken seriously. 

I was right, the Ai is right. Nothing to prove. 

Sorry I can only respond to the first sentence when it comes to you at this point. I can only make you worse. 

Then you've effectively conceded the argument. “I was right, the AI is right, nothing to prove” isn't a rebuttal; it's simply asserting that your conclusion is correct while refusing to address the reasoning. And “I can only make you worse” is another unsupported claim about my psychology, based on the same assumption that you have some special ability to see what is happening to me. You're not demonstrating that hierarchy, you're repeatedly presupposing it.

You're confirmed to have chronic cynicism. I can't as you say, "argue", with someone while I'm unable to take them seriously. That and it's not important to me to win whatever this is. Nothing to gain.