Sometimes its unknowingly used in condoning bad behavior or rewarding incompetence.
When I said Losers also manifest. You instantly suggested you'd say that with sympathy meanwhile in some cases the subject is to blame for being a loser.
When I said losers also manifest, it doesn't imply I'm being disdainful. As the environment shapes us, we also shape it.
...Because I take pity on losers who manifest shitty realities for themselves. Most of the times they do it without realizing it. And they're totally to blame, most losers who manifest a poor future for themselves are very shitty people. I pity them.
Its similar to how I pity a kid who tried to bully me in school. I felt sympathy for him when I forced his face down the toilet and flushed.
If you had empathy, you'd have experienced some forum of egotistical insecurity from him, then you'd have been enraged of shamed after the event.
At best you'd feel guilty and remorsful, but not sympathy. If what you say is true, you dunked someone head in a public toilet. That's a struggle that could've killed someone.
If you fixed the bully, sympathy isn't in order where justice is served unless you too are the same kind of ass that learns the hard way like he had to.
I do believe you didn't mean it with disdain. I had assumed you talked about people you disdain when you said it.
It so happens I am disdainful of people who happen to be losers, but they weren't the focus of discussion.
Not everything we manifest are good things.
Sure. But there are other variables that determine if you'll sympathize with someone. It's not like you're going to give your heart to just any random joe who never got the job. If you had the ultimate awareness you'll find no rest being supportive of something that happens countless times a day globally.
I kind of do. I just cant act on it. I have significant amount of love inside of me.
Every type of shit you can imagine happens 24/7. If you hear on the news about a fatal stabbing of some stranger, and it'll ruin your whole day and you'll cry yourself to sleep.
There's sympathy, then there's an expression of sympathy, which is kinda of a mask that can fool even the one wearing it.
At times you may say "you have my sympathy" but let's not forget you question if you're a good person, and you are scripted to fit in.
That was already over 3 weeks ago.
Ive evolved to be more authentic.
Doubt it.
The temp worker was with me for an hour. His performance was so weak I'd argue progress in terms of help was moving backward for wasting materials and making a mess.
Did I feel sympathy ? No. He was very defensive when I tried to show up again and again. In person I'm very patient and kind, but this wasn't a new hire, it was a temp worker the boss ordered to finish a rush job.
Hey, Im not blaming you.
Maybe the temp worker went home and someone gave him sympathy which isn't what he needs. They'll be supportive while I cannot support him, my claim on that day is true and makes sense, while the sympathy does nothing to improve him.
I mean sure in this case. But youre generalizing it to every case.
I did list examples where sympathy is called for. Sympathy is also something that fades. It must fade, and it does.
I think you do offer sympathy at face value, and not by this example, but you did mention you'd just express sympathy.
There are people in this world who prey on the sympathetic.
We're not talking about the broken hearted or someone who was robbed, or an innocent person who was beaten, nor are we talking about someone grieving over the loss of a loved one, or a child whos dog was hit by a car. None of this is weakness or worthy of despise. If anything it forces strength and the better version of the self to surface.
Its totally weakness and its their fault if the dog was hit. But yes being unsympathetic is not helpful.
I don't suggest those examples to be weakness or unworthy of sympathy.
I'll use Dragoon as an example. Always complaining. Has a perpetual victim mindset with issues that has nothing to do with him. He's very soy. lacks wisdom 99% of the time, I see he'd be a weak leader. Weakness. If we were all like that we'd have gone extinct long ago.
Take that bitch who was balling when Trump was first inaugurated. Weakness.
If Kamala was inaugurated, my weakness would be exploited too, but I don't think I'd behave in such a way. Been through that once with Biden and I took it like a champ. I even think it even turned out to be a good thing that Biden got 4 years in office, cause people were more focused on politics, they say the difference between night and day.
We're talking about losers. Yes you can sympathise with them for whatever reason, and they will appreciate your "support". Key word. Support.
Support for what? For them to get their act together? Yes. Condoning their activities..? No.
Sympathy is supportive.
- "Support or agreement: Having alignment with a specific cause or political group (e.g., "her sympathies were clearly pro-environmental")
My friend's Mother is a bit of a Karen. She'd back her Son even if he's in the wrong.
If you sympathise with the wrong people, you're enabling foolery.
If you find they are an ass and want to support them, then you should scaffold, not sympathise.
Someone pierces themselves. You'll support them. Okay. I on the other hand don't think that's a good thing.
Pierces? Like stabs themselves or something? Why wouldnt you help someone who stabs themselves?
People who stab themselves, don't do it intentionally. It's the result of a backfire. Sin a synonymous with stupidity. They go to strike someone in some way, and they end up bringing calamity into their lives.
You yourself mentioned that losers aren't usually good people. Yes.
The natural laws, nature's laws if you will, we can't separate ourselves from nature, the natural laws will punish us when we do stupid things. Reality is a great teacher. I'm not their boss, nor are they inclined to listen to me. I don't monitor them either so people are free to do dumb shit.
I try to better people. You do too. We go about it different ways, and I dont think your way works.
I take care of over a dozen people on a daily basis, helping them with their careers, future, character, and coaching them in research. What I find works is enforcing a strict quality control without morally demonizing failure.
You're not taking care of over a dozen losers now are you Legga ? If all you had were subjects highly prone to failure on your hands, I promise you'd find it very demonic in nature. That isn't the case though it is.
We're not talking about winners, getting to leg up by the good doctor here. We're talking weakness. With you only the strongest ones get to play, and rightfully so. You don't have time to fuck around