Oh I never said they were "inferior", that was the buzzword Xena stuffed in your head in this very thread, and now you're using it as a talking point to argue with me. You're programmable.
I said "let's see what you got here".... Nate, Dragoon Delora. The people you claim to be smarter than, but you're actually aligned with them intellectually.
Well you didn't bother correcting Xena here:
Now he's adopting ideas from Zena, and agreeing he doesn't think them inferior which is different than the version of him that claims intellectual supremacy, though still claiming hyper awareness on a level greater than anyone else.
You imply here that I'm contradicting myself by saying I'm smart while holding that TC, Dragoon, and Delora are not inferior to me. Ultimately you're yourself using the vocabulary that you claim Xena "smuggled in".
As for being programmable, I see it differently. I'm adaptable, coachable, and quick to learn. What I learn from you all I take to heart and make it my own. That's one of the reasons I'm smart, I listen and adapt.
You don't enjoy intellectual challenges. Not in here anyway.
When have I refused an intellectual challenge?
We're talking about you lacking the ability to formulate a conclusion about yourself while claiming to be hyper self away.
...As in I can't figure out if I'm a good person? That's because my Bayesian data is incomplete so the evidence is inconclusive.
I'd argue that epistemologically it has little to do with self awareness and more to do with your ability to gather and synthesize ideas. My argument is that I lack the data to synthesize the ideas conclusively.
If you're thinking of it in terms of your favorite large language models then you could write:
P(word|prompt; training data)
How well you can synthesize the words from the training data is a function of how powerful the AI model is but ultimately if your training data is lacking you will not reach the correct vocabulary. That's why AI must reach robotics to evolve from a highly trained monkey into skynet.
So what is "your" answer to the question?
It's still pointing out something about you, and you are currently in the 3rd stage of denial, where you'll laugh.
Sure it points out "something" about me, but I'd need that "something" to be somehow profound to justify me thinking about it for more than 5 seconds.
You're not very precise with your language.
The side note is a side note that continues to distract you for being genuine, but side note aside, you're also ignore my question in regards to what you've said in that line, and I won't be getting an answer as you question the question and want to fence with the side note, as I said you would.
Do you mean that there was a question in that spaghetti post that you say I keep misrepresenting? Maybe if you repeated the question instead of being such a Debbie Downer about it, I could answer.
Plus why would I be the jealous one here Doctor ? Do I have some ego or reputation to protect like you do Mr. smart guy ?
I have a reputation to protect but only insofar as it threatens my family financially, not because it threatens my ego.
