Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

...wait, did you pick that fetus as your avatar because it conforms to the Golden Ratio shape? 

Do you know how often it doesn't? This is some crazy OCD shit. 

 I picked the fetus as my avatar cause I'm pro life, and I think this image is cool. I'm sure it's all CG.

What lead you to start attacking my avatar all of a sudden ?

Image of the golden ratio next to your avatar had me like 'waaait'...

lol don't mind me carry on. 

 Okay. 

Feel free to point out all the times the human body doesn't conform to the golden ratio then.

Even now you're not going by your own means, you've adopted Xena's perception while throwing flattery her way.

What perception? Her translation of what you're saying?

Yeah, because your first post gave me a stroke while I was trying to read it and I'm not even a native English speaker. This is what you said:

Not gonna boast about my hyper awareness. Much. But I'm drawn to responding to that one sentence, the rest of the post kinda contradicts..... Function. Like the Golden radio.

Question is, how come you're not hyper self aware about you're principals being any good and seeking external validation from...well what do you got here. Nate.... Dragoon.....What ? Delora.... Guy you said you were the smartest one here.

You killed Godzilla with that post.

Seriously I don't know how Xena managed to translate that to mean you think "I wouldnt seek validation if I were smart from those inferior to me" without some sort of large language model decrypt your spaghetti message. However, her translation sounded like something you would say, and then you acted later like you totally think I consider TC and other inferior and didn't make an attempt to clarify, so I presumed her translation is correct.

If it's not, how about you get off your high horse, stop obfuscating your own message and explain what you meant, instead of acting like some sort of mystic Yoda whose life lessons your audience needs to extract.

Oh I never said they were "inferior", that was the buzzword Xena stuffed in your head in this very thread, and now you're using it as a talking point to argue with me. You're programmable.

I said "let's see what you got here".... Nate, Dragoon Delora. The people you claim to be smarter than, but you're actually aligned with them intellectually.

Well you didn't bother correcting Xena here:

Now he's adopting ideas from Zena, and agreeing he doesn't think them inferior which is different than the version of him that claims intellectual supremacy, though still claiming hyper awareness on a level greater than anyone else.

You imply here that I'm contradicting myself by saying I'm smart while holding that TC, Dragoon, and Delora are not inferior to me. Ultimately you're yourself using the vocabulary that you claim Xena "smuggled in".

As for being programmable, I see it differently. I'm adaptable, coachable, and quick to learn. What I learn from you all I take to heart and make it my own. That's one of the reasons I'm smart, I listen and adapt. 

You don't enjoy intellectual challenges. Not in here anyway.

When have I refused an intellectual challenge? 

We're talking about you lacking the ability to formulate a conclusion about yourself while claiming to be hyper self away.

...As in I can't figure out if I'm a good person? That's because my Bayesian data is incomplete so the evidence is inconclusive.

I'd argue that epistemologically it has little to do with self awareness and more to do with your ability to gather and synthesize ideas. My argument is that I lack the data to synthesize the ideas conclusively.

If you're thinking of it in terms of your favorite large language models then you could write:

P(word|prompt; training data)

How well you can synthesize the words from the training data is a function of how powerful the AI model is but ultimately if your training data is lacking you will not reach the correct vocabulary. That's why AI must reach robotics to evolve from a highly trained monkey into skynet. 

So what is "your" answer to the question?

It's still pointing out something about you, and you are currently in the 3rd stage of denial, where you'll laugh.

The side note is a side note that continues to distract you for being genuine, but side note aside, you're also ignore my question in regards to what you've said in that line, and I won't be getting an answer as you question the question and want to fence with the side note, as I said you would.

Plus why would I be the jealous one here Doctor ? Do I have some ego or reputation to protect like you do Mr. smart guy ?

I have a reputation to protect but only insofar as it threatens my family financially, not because it threatens my ego.

Jada said: 

Even now you're not going by your own means, you've adopted Xena's perception while throwing flattery her way.

What perception? Her translation of what you're saying?

Yeah, because your first post gave me a stroke while I was trying to read it and I'm not even a native English speaker. This is what you said:

Not gonna boast about my hyper awareness. Much. But I'm drawn to responding to that one sentence, the rest of the post kinda contradicts..... Function. Like the Golden radio.

Question is, how come you're not hyper self aware about you're principals being any good and seeking external validation from...well what do you got here. Nate.... Dragoon.....What ? Delora.... Guy you said you were the smartest one here.

You killed Godzilla with that post.

Seriously I don't know how Xena managed to translate that to mean you think "I wouldnt seek validation if I were smart from those inferior to me" without some sort of large language model decrypt your spaghetti message. However, her translation sounded like something you would say, and then you acted later like you totally think I consider TC and other inferior and didn't make an attempt to clarify, so I presumed her translation is correct.

If it's not, how about you get off your high horse, stop obfuscating your own message and explain what you meant, instead of acting like some sort of mystic Yoda whose life lessons your audience needs to extract.

 Tony's posts are not all that difficult to translate, actually (unless they're about crypto and investments.)

His opinions about people are standard for a MGTOW.

I watched Contrapoints' instructional series on toxic masculinity 10 years ago while she was still hot. She looked like Prince Caspian in shiny gold undies and eyeliner running through a snowy forest. YOWZA. 😍😍 That was the role I always wished Ben Barnes would play. Cuz he's SO DELICIOUS. Or he was back then. 

lol anyway...  MGTOWs are mostly damaged and socially awkward men, ranging in severity from mildly autistic up to deranged  narcopaths. They have difficulty with their relationships with women. Their misogynistic philosophies align sharply with incels and PUAs, with slightly different expected outcomes. Which is kinda funny, cuz...definition of insanity and all that. 😋 I guess it's more about commiserating with other damaged bros and forming lynch mobs or witch pyres or whatever.

Throw in a dash of Machiavelli, and your standard tRumper humper talking points, and you can pretty much break any one of Tony's opinions on any subject down to some sort of a pissing contest with fewer than a dozen goals at its core.

From there, you can usually boil it down further to one or 2.

And that's how I get through Tony's spaghetti. Boomer reference: He's Archie Bunker.

So I ask myself, what would Meathead say? And Edith? 😉

Well Legga, it wasn't I who claimed to be the smartest person here. You say you're the 0.001% being one of 83,000 or so out of 7 billion people to be that smart, but honestly I don't see it. You claim intellectual supremacy which doesn't bother me, but I really don't see it. That's why you make these threads comparing yourself to me and want to have cock waving contests. But that all backfired didn't it. We know you, that being me, and you, kinda inflated what you say about yourself here, though what you do for a living isn't for dummies. It's kinda worrisome when I think about it. I don't see you finding any cheap solutions to that illness.

The word "Inferior" was handed to you here, and now it's being used against me. While you'd claim to be lonely from intelligence and would trade anything to downgrade your intelligence. 

.

.

.

Or you can simply just answer the question instead of being conflicted with my brilliance. Which you won't.

Why can't a hyper self aware person not determine their own moral standing, or know if they're a good person ?

I know why but I want to hear it from you. ( Doubt you'll answer )

Why can't a hyper self aware person not determine their own moral standing, or know if they're a good person ?

Because the data on what is a good person is inconclusive.

Jada said:

Is hyper self awareness mutually exclusive with virtuosity?

I've been hyper focused and hyper self aware of what I'm doing, ever since I was a little kid, much more so than anyone else in the world.

I've been wondering if me being hyper self aware means I'm a terrible person. I can be entirely objective and place myself out of a situation in a way that I observe others can't. When I'm kind, I'm hyper aware of it. I feel like there's nothing genuine about it, it's not a visceral reaction for me at all, I've never had a visceral reaction to anything, save for panic when my life is threatened.

Do you think you need a visceral reaction to suffering in order for your help to be considered genuine?

 Helping people is pretty evil because people are inherently evil.

Jada said:

Behavior is all situational and adaptive.

If you're a consequentialist, would you label a person virtuous as opposed to labeling acts evil/virtuous? E.g., is Ted Bundy evil or were only his actions evil?

Ted Bundy was evil because he wanted to hurt people, no? It would be irrelevant if he had a chance to act on it.

Therefore, a person is virtuous if he wants to help people but can't, and is not virtuous if he does not want to help people, but do.

 I'd say SM is more evil than Ted Bundy because SM would want an SA victim to give birth, while Ted Bundy didn't let them give birth. 

Spatial Mind said:

My picture is a fetus because I am pro-life.
I said "let's see what you got here".... Nate, Dragoon Delora. The people you claim to be smarter than, but you're actually aligned with them intellectually.

Ofc you categorize Jada as against you so you must deny his intellectual differences that might prove someone who is smart can disagree with you. You are vehemently against policies that help people live, and claim to be pro-life, and yes abortion availability is also a policy that helps people live, including the medical help options that cannot be available otherwise.

Zena said:

I watched Contrapoints' instructional series on toxic masculinity 10 years ago while she was still hot. She looked like Prince Caspian in shiny gold undies and eyeliner running through a snowy forest. YOWZA. 😍😍 That was the role I always wished Ben Barnes would play. Cuz he's SO DELICIOUS. Or he was back then.



lol anyway... MGTOWs are mostly damaged and socially awkward men, ranging in severity from mildly autistic up to deranged narcopaths. They have difficulty with their relationships with women. Their misogynistic philosophies align sharply with incels and PUAs, with slightly different expected outcomes. Which is kinda funny, cuz...definition of insanity and all that. 😋 I guess it's more about commiserating with other damaged bros and forming lynch mobs or witch pyres or whatever.

This is a bunch of female chauvinism bullshit. We both know women were also on Epstein's island eating and raping children. 

Feminist icon JK Rowling herself is on a crusade against trans people, and no terfs really are not that unique while the rest might tolerate trans people if they act like lapdogs. Join me in true and equal misanthropy, and yes it might seem like chud/incel bullshit to you at first, but you got get over that and see the truth I am explaining. 

Nah you're full of bullshit.

Seriously, if women are really the bullies, then why are there no women left on this site?

They all left by about 2022 ish. Except for med, who has about the worst case of Stockholm Syndrome I've ever seen online.

The rest of us are only popping in once every couple of months.

True and equal misanthropy... Lol I might consider it.

I'm hating the whole human race more and more in my old age.

I still have a soft spot for my sisters, though. They're way less likely to try to fuck over my life. And if they do, they're way less likely to succeed.

Zena said: 

med, who has about the worst case of Stockholm Syndrome I've ever seen online.

How conveniently you forget how Med uses economic advantage to have sex with Chapo. She is not one of Chapo's victims and Chapo has had a lot times where he's entirely honest with her about his intentions and his disdain.