Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

Don't get it wrong when I speak of CS. I wouldn't go for it either, but that doesn't mean she isn't the best SC had to offer a guy seeking a connection with a woman here.

I'd go for literally anyone else on here, even the men. 

I'd even thirst for you before I thirst for CS, if it was somehow some sort of stuck on a desert island scenario or something, just to give you a sense of comparative metric. 

Key word, had. Can talk with her and much more easy going. She was just more fun for a guy to deal with and ended up being the one to both deliver what SC likes to see, while impacting the most men here in more profound ways than any female in SC history. It is what it is. 

She's a monster, and your saying this strikes me as digging out of the bottom of the barrel. 

You're better than this dude. 

When men are cooked, so are women. Women would rather there be men in this world, than be stuck with just women. 100%

If a women could exist without men, there would be far less done. And I mean, far far far far less.

Over which things, and why would that be? 

Lesbians can adopt, and men can be sperm donors. Men are reportedly doing worse occupationally and educationally than years ago while women are doing better. It's impossible now to afford a house, it's hard to pay various insurance costs, the cost of food is up as well as general trade, unemployment is higher than ever, and gay couples report a better average when it comes to child development when they are single sex parents (two men or two women). 

Doesn't it therefor make more sense, that during a time of economic strife, that two successful women pair up to raise a baby? They get to pick ideal traits from a man like shopping at the store and the men who are economically struggling right now can both make some extra cash needed to survive today's economy and can know their lineage will go on in spite of their socially gregarious failings. 

Think about it, if your choice is to have no genetic lineage, or know some happy lesbian couple out there is taking care of your kid, statistically speaking, better than a normal marriage would, why wouldn't you pick the approach that has you escape failing to push your genes to the next generation of people? 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Don't get it wrong when I speak of CS. I wouldn't go for it either, but that doesn't mean she isn't the best SC had to offer a guy seeking a connection with a woman here.

I'd go for literally anyone else on here, even the men. 

I'd even thirst for you before I thirst for CS, if it was somehow some sort of stuck on a desert island scenario or something, just to give you a sense of comparative metric. 

Sure. That doesn't dispel the fact in the matter though. When CS comes here, that chatlog comes to life. Very easy to get along with. 

Key word, had. Can talk with her and much more easy going. She was just more fun for a guy to deal with and ended up being the one to both deliver what SC likes to see, while impacting the most men here in more profound ways than any female in SC history. It is what it is. 

She's a monster, and your saying this strikes me as digging out of the bottom of the barrel. 

You're better than this dude. 

That's your opinion. 

CS is still easy going toward men. For any man looking to connect with a woman on SC, she's the best of what SC had to offer. Not saying she's a prime pick, but in this little world, hands down there are no better options. 

Not only did CS travel around to bang those guys, but she had TWO of them drop everything and go running to her. Chapo and you're old roommate Tryptamine. So there you go. Your opinion and taste holds no weight to whats really etched into historical truth.

The point i'm making, regardless of one's taste or opinion, compared to other females here CS was the shit. She shows up and it's party time, the others just show up and there's nothing to say.

When men are cooked, so are women. Women would rather there be men in this world, than be stuck with just women. 100%

If a women could exist without men, there would be far less done. And I mean, far far far far less.

Over which things, and why would that be? 

That's actually a laughable question.

Lesbians can adopt, and men can be sperm donors. Men are reportedly doing worse occupationally and educationally than years ago while women are doing better. It's impossible now to afford a house, it's hard to pay various insurance costs, the cost of food is up as well as general trade, unemployment is higher than ever, and gay couples report a better average when it comes to child development when they are single sex parents (two men or two women). 

Doesn't it therefor make more sense, that during a time of economic strife, that two successful women pair up to raise a baby? They get to pick ideal traits from a man like shopping at the store and the men who are economically struggling right now can both make some extra cash needed to survive today's economy and can know their lineage will go on in spite of their socially gregarious failings. 

Think about it, if your choice is to have no genetic lineage, or know some happy lesbian couple out there is taking care of your kid, statistically speaking, better than a normal marriage would, why wouldn't you pick the approach that has you escape failing to push your genes to the next generation of people? 

Same sex couples have a higher rate of separation. Female+female couples. especially. They have the highest separation/divorce rates in the world.

And there you are, praising it as though it's some better state of being or even a healthier way to raise a child. You don't praise it out of knowledge or wisdom, you praise it out of ambitious derangement. 

With this, I don't think you respect your Father, nor do I think he instilled any wisdom in his....Son.

Your Mother ( I dare not say her name ) was the boss in the household from the looks of it. Whatever went on in your house, you really don't want to see it again and I don't blame you, but not every household has a poor excuse of a weak man as a parent, to a point where his son has hopes and dreams of male extinction, where humans are born out of test tubes, and vaginas has less purpose in a Godless world.  

.

.

.

90% of Women are straight. Maybe the percentage is even higher. 

90% of women are straight, and they actually do like men. Men are desired by women. That's the truth.

LGB and adoption ? That's insignificant in the grand scheme and uninteresting to me. It cannot become common due to the rarity of LGB, and even moreso, the rarity of LGB that even want to do adopt. 

It nothing to do with me and it cannot possibly inspire me. When it comes to 2 women raising a little boy, and he's groomed to be a transexual. LOL. Good luck kid, I can't do anything for you. When parents fail their child and lead them astray, the world will fuck them up.  

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Don't get it wrong when I speak of CS. I wouldn't go for it either, but that doesn't mean she isn't the best SC had to offer a guy seeking a connection with a woman here.

I'd go for literally anyone else on here, even the men. 

I'd even thirst for you before I thirst for CS, if it was somehow some sort of stuck on a desert island scenario or something, just to give you a sense of comparative metric. 

Sure. That doesn't dispel the fact in the matter though. When CS comes here, that chatlog comes to life. Very easy to get along with. 

Key word, had. Can talk with her and much more easy going. She was just more fun for a guy to deal with and ended up being the one to both deliver what SC likes to see, while impacting the most men here in more profound ways than any female in SC history. It is what it is. 

She's a monster, and your saying this strikes me as digging out of the bottom of the barrel. 

You're better than this dude. 

That's your opinion. 

Not only did CS travel around to bang those guys, but she had TWO of them drop everything and go running to her. Chapo and you're old roommate Tryptamine. So there you go. Your opinion and taste holds no weight to whats really etched into historical truth.

CS is still easy going toward men. For any man looking to connect with a woman on SC, she's the best of what SC had to offer. Not saying she's a prime pick, but in this little world, hands down there are no better options. 

It's an easy opinion for people to have. 

Dude she's injured people even. Keep it in your pants, read the older stories even out of her own mouth littering this forum, save yourself the trouble. 

If you're touting CS, something's wrong with you. 

The point i'm making, regardless of one's taste or opinion, compared to other females here CS was the shit. She shows up and it's party time, the others just show up and there's nothing to say.

No. 

She's horrible, something is wrong with you, get your erection down and try again. 

When men are cooked, so are women. Women would rather there be men in this world, than be stuck with just women. 100%

If a women could exist without men, there would be far less done. And I mean, far far far far less.

Over which things, and why would that be? 

That's actually a laughable question.

You can't answer it, at least not in this context. 

Men are Cooked. 

Lesbians can adopt, and men can be sperm donors. Men are reportedly doing worse occupationally and educationally than years ago while women are doing better. It's impossible now to afford a house, it's hard to pay various insurance costs, the cost of food is up as well as general trade, unemployment is higher than ever, and gay couples report a better average when it comes to child development when they are single sex parents (two men or two women). 

Doesn't it therefor make more sense, that during a time of economic strife, that two successful women pair up to raise a baby? They get to pick ideal traits from a man like shopping at the store and the men who are economically struggling right now can both make some extra cash needed to survive today's economy and can know their lineage will go on in spite of their socially gregarious failings. 

Think about it, if your choice is to have no genetic lineage, or know some happy lesbian couple out there is taking care of your kid, statistically speaking, better than a normal marriage would, why wouldn't you pick the approach that has you escape failing to push your genes to the next generation of people? 

Same sex couples have a higher rate of separation. Female+female couples. especially. They have the highest separation/divorce rates in the world.

How many lesbian couples are there compared to the norm? That will offset the average. 

Christian views have a puritanical way of keeping bad couples together and promoting a lack of protection when it comes to sex. There are more of them who find less reason to split up, but that does not serve as an indicator of quality of life. 

If they're already gay, they're already that much less Christian, and as such more likely to support divorce. This is a good thing, not a bad one, and more straight people need to get on board with divorce not less. 

And there you are, praising it as though it's some better state of being or even a healthier way to raise a child. You don't praise it out of knowledge or wisdom, you praise it out of ambitious derangement. 

It's statistics. 

Don't hate the player, hate the game. 

With this, I don't think you respect your Father, nor do I think he instilled any wisdom in his....Son.

Your Mother ( I dare not say her name ) was the boss in the household from the looks of it. Whatever went on in your house, you really don't want to see it again

They're good people, and what you suggest is disgusting just for the sake of serving your own pre-existing argument. 

and I don't blame you, but not every household has a poor excuse of a weak man as a parent, to a point where his son has hopes and dreams of male extinction, where humans are born out of test tubes, and vaginas has less purpose in a Godless world.  

He knew martial arts and proved himself 'a man', he just happened to take up the role of raising a child from already having been the oldest sibling in his family. 

He had the training to be a mother, while she grew up on Murphy Brown. It was weird then, but it's normal now. 

90% of Women are straight. Maybe the percentage is even higher. 

90% of women are straight, and they actually do like men. Men are desired by women. That's the truth.

60% nurture 40% nature, so most are bisexual within the model of modern society and media. 

LGB and adoption ? That's insignificant in the grand scheme and uninteresting to me. It cannot become common due to the rarity of LGB, and even moreso, the rarity of LGB that even want to do adopt. 

It's less rare and rarer every day, and a lot of them still want to raise a child together just like any other coupling. 

It's two humans who love eachother at the end of the day. 

It nothing to do with me and it cannot possibly inspire me. When it comes to 2 women raising a little boy, and he's groomed to be a transexual. LOL. Good luck kid, I can't do anything for you. When parents fail their child and lead them astray, the world will fuck them up.  

There's straight kids raised in gay families, just like the movie The Birdcage with Nathan Lane and Robin Williams. 

If you were a dad, how would you raise your kid in the modern age? 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

I'd go for literally anyone else on here, even the men. 

I'd even thirst for you before I thirst for CS, if it was somehow some sort of stuck on a desert island scenario or something, just to give you a sense of comparative metric. 

Sure. That doesn't dispel the fact in the matter though. When CS comes here, that chatlog comes to life. Very easy to get along with. 

She's a monster, and your saying this strikes me as digging out of the bottom of the barrel. 

You're better than this dude. 

That's your opinion. 

Not only did CS travel around to bang those guys, but she had TWO of them drop everything and go running to her. Chapo and you're old roommate Tryptamine. So there you go. Your opinion and taste holds no weight to whats really etched into historical truth.

CS is still easy going toward men. For any man looking to connect with a woman on SC, she's the best of what SC had to offer. Not saying she's a prime pick, but in this little world, hands down there are no better options. 

It's an easy opinion for people to have. 

Dude she's injured people even. Keep it in your pants, read the older stories even out of her own mouth littering this forum, save yourself the trouble. 

If you're touting CS, something's wrong with you. 

You have someone else in mind ? Who would that be ?

It's not my goal to sell anyone. I'm just speaking facts, and that is, for a guy who was seeking a female connection on SC, CS was in fact their best option. She's a 6 time gold medalist in these parts. Trypt had options, Chapo had options, and they both chose her. Jim hit it, and 3 other guys. She comes on here and she's more engaging to chat with. 

When I talk to her, it isn't sexual. It's pure jokes. I hope her and Trypt are doing okay. Kinda brave for him to go there, charging to the rescue despite how fucked up she is. 

The point i'm making, regardless of one's taste or opinion, compared to other females here CS was the shit. She shows up and it's party time, the others just show up and there's nothing to say.

No. 

She's horrible, something is wrong with you, get your erection down and try again. 

I just told you I wouldn't hit it. I could've long ago, but nah. 

She comes here, I listen and give her feedback. Chapo will make his presence known, and she's open to talking to anyone. That's what guys appreciate. 

Don't know what she thinks about you, probably not a fan. 

Over which things, and why would that be? 

That's actually a laughable question.

You can't answer it, at least not in this context. 

Men are Cooked. 

False. 

It's laughable cause men build the world. This whole infrastructure, the internet, being able to have electricity every single day. The force behind being able to communicate on a website, is "sustained" by men. It's a laughable question.

One thing I notice about women who support men. Hm. That are fine as fuck. Conservative women. Women with their heads screwed on properly. Worth it. 

Lesbians can adopt, and men can be sperm donors. Men are reportedly doing worse occupationally and educationally than years ago while women are doing better. It's impossible now to afford a house, it's hard to pay various insurance costs, the cost of food is up as well as general trade, unemployment is higher than ever, and gay couples report a better average when it comes to child development when they are single sex parents (two men or two women). 

Doesn't it therefor make more sense, that during a time of economic strife, that two successful women pair up to raise a baby? They get to pick ideal traits from a man like shopping at the store and the men who are economically struggling right now can both make some extra cash needed to survive today's economy and can know their lineage will go on in spite of their socially gregarious failings. 

Think about it, if your choice is to have no genetic lineage, or know some happy lesbian couple out there is taking care of your kid, statistically speaking, better than a normal marriage would, why wouldn't you pick the approach that has you escape failing to push your genes to the next generation of people? 

Same sex couples have a higher rate of separation. Female+female couples. especially. They have the highest separation/divorce rates in the world.

How many lesbian couples are there compared to the norm? That will offset the average. 

It's measured in percentages. It's the ratio of failed relations not the number of people. If the numbers between straight and gay were even, the numbers for failed relations between the gays would be astronomically higher. So no the average won't offset if you add your "if". Also.... If doesn't exist. 

Christian views have a puritanical way of keeping bad couples together and promoting a lack of protection when it comes to sex. There are more of them who find less reason to split up, but that does not serve as an indicator of quality of life. 

If they're already gay, they're already that much less Christian, and as such more likely to support divorce. This is a good thing, not a bad one, and more straight people need to get on board with divorce not less. 

It's not being Gay, it's sodomy that's an abomination.

Gay Christians are cool. Same with the conservative ones, and the ones that hate being compartmentalized with the LGBTQ. If I were gay, I'd be like please don't group me with those people. I'm not interested in celebrating sexuality for a living, that's really perverted. 

And there you are, praising it as though it's some better state of being or even a healthier way to raise a child. You don't praise it out of knowledge or wisdom, you praise it out of ambitious derangement. 

It's statistics. 

Don't hate the player, hate the game. 

Statistics don't support your fantasy though. Statistically, female+female couples has the highest fail rate. To think it should be common for 2 wombs to adopt a child I a recipe for disaster, as damn near all of those arrangements, fail. 

With this, I don't think you respect your Father, nor do I think he instilled any wisdom in his....Son.

Your Mother ( I dare not say her name ) was the boss in the household from the looks of it. Whatever went on in your house, you really don't want to see it again

They're good people, and what you suggest is disgusting just for the sake of serving your own pre-existing argument. 

Are they really ? Because you don't want to see men and women together your childhood growing up with a Father and Mother must've been a terrible experience. You really seem to wish your Father wasn't there and instead some strange woman raised you as she'd lick your Mother's vagina while you slept. That is after all, your dream for the rest of the world.

and I don't blame you, but not every household has a poor excuse of a weak man as a parent, to a point where his son has hopes and dreams of male extinction, where humans are born out of test tubes, and vaginas has less purpose in a Godless world.  

He knew martial arts and proved himself 'a man', he just happened to take up the role of raising a child from already having been the oldest sibling in his family. 

He had the training to be a mother, while she grew up on Murphy Brown. It was weird then, but it's normal now. 

So he wasn't masculine. 

Okay so he had the training to be a Mother. So while it was just you and him, he acted like a female or something, that burned into your puny underdeveloped child skull, and you loved the fucker, who might have been your uncle for all I know, taking up the role of raising a child. In turn you developed into a transexual cause a feminine man was deep seeded into you.

He was also proven to be a man cause he knows martial arts. Okay. Men don't usually have to prove they are men but that guy did for some reason. 

He worked with Jerry Momoda in the 90's Mhm. I see them together.

Interesting. 

Your Father is a snowbird. 

His hair is silver now.

He lost a lot of weight. Still a bit hefty, He has a nice career. But he's far away from you.

You're not his only child Nathan. A female ? I can't tell. Is it another transgender ?

Damn. That's your Dad ? He seems nice.

90% of Women are straight. Maybe the percentage is even higher. 

90% of women are straight, and they actually do like men. Men are desired by women. That's the truth.

60% nurture 40% nature, so most are bisexual within the model of modern society and media. 

I'm seeing 87% of women are straight. 5% bisexual. The rest are weirdos and some of those weirdos don't exist.  

LGB and adoption ? That's insignificant in the grand scheme and uninteresting to me. It cannot become common due to the rarity of LGB, and even moreso, the rarity of LGB that even want to do adopt. 

It's less rare and rarer every day, and a lot of them still want to raise a child together just like any other coupling. 

It's two humans who love eachother at the end of the day. 

Well guy, I'm not exactly going to go create an ad for it. cause at the end of the day, most of those relationships crumble The statistic doesn't amuse me or anything, but an individual case is high risk while the in the grand scheme of the subject it's a promise of a broken home. I also don't worry about shit like that. 

It nothing to do with me and it cannot possibly inspire me. When it comes to 2 women raising a little boy, and he's groomed to be a transexual. LOL. Good luck kid, I can't do anything for you. When parents fail their child and lead them astray, the world will fuck them up.  

There's straight kids raised in gay families, just like the movie The Birdcage with Nathan Lane and Robin Williams. 

EDIT: I never responded to this one. 

I was talking about those parents that have a 3 year old transgender. It's the parents that encourage it in those cases. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Sure. That doesn't dispel the fact in the matter though. When CS comes here, that chatlog comes to life. Very easy to get along with. 

That's your opinion. 

Not only did CS travel around to bang those guys, but she had TWO of them drop everything and go running to her. Chapo and you're old roommate Tryptamine. So there you go. Your opinion and taste holds no weight to whats really etched into historical truth.

CS is still easy going toward men. For any man looking to connect with a woman on SC, she's the best of what SC had to offer. Not saying she's a prime pick, but in this little world, hands down there are no better options. 

It's an easy opinion for people to have. 

Dude she's injured people even. Keep it in your pants, read the older stories even out of her own mouth littering this forum, save yourself the trouble. 

If you're touting CS, something's wrong with you. 

You have someone else in mind ? Who would that be ?

Literally anyone else, and not just from here either. 

It's not my goal to sell anyone. I'm just speaking facts, and that is, for a guy who was seeking a female connection on SC, CS was in fact their best option. She's a 6 time gold medalist in these parts. Trypt had options, Chapo had options, and they both chose her. Jim hit it, and 3 other guys. She comes on here and she's more engaging to chat with. 

I'm sorry that you've found yourself enchanted by her somehow, I didn't think you were that desperate. It's crazy to see you defending her this far into her time here, but also like a typical man to think with his dick before reason. 

So how is she the best option again, purely because she's got a body count? 

The point i'm making, regardless of one's taste or opinion, compared to other females here CS was the shit. She shows up and it's party time, the others just show up and there's nothing to say.

No. 

She's horrible, something is wrong with you, get your erection down and try again. 

I just told you I wouldn't hit it. I could've long ago, but nah. 

No, you couldn't we've outright watched her turn you down more than once. 

She comes here, I listen and give her feedback. Chapo will make his presence known, and she's open to talking to anyone. That's what guys appreciate. 

Don't know what she thinks about you, probably not a fan. 

Why should I care how someone with her track record feels about me, and for that matter why do you care about how she feels about you?

You can't be so out of touch with women that she's all you've got to talk to, right? 

That's actually a laughable question.

You can't answer it, at least not in this context. 

Men are Cooked. 

False. 

It's laughable cause men build the world. This whole infrastructure, the internet, being able to have electricity every single day. The force behind being able to communicate on a website, is "sustained" by men. It's a laughable question.

Appealing to antiquity's all you got? 

One thing I notice about women who support men. Hm. That are fine as fuck. Conservative women. Women with their heads screwed on properly. Worth it. 

Who, like Candace Owens? 

Same sex couples have a higher rate of separation. Female+female couples. especially. They have the highest separation/divorce rates in the world.

How many lesbian couples are there compared to the norm? That will offset the average. 

It's measured in percentages. It's the ratio of failed relations not the number of people. If the numbers between straight and gay were even, the numbers for failed relations between the gays would be astronomically higher. So no the average won't offset if you add your "if". Also.... If doesn't exist. 

Christian views have a puritanical way of keeping bad couples together and promoting a lack of protection when it comes to sex. There are more of them who find less reason to split up, but that does not serve as an indicator of quality of life. 

If they're already gay, they're already that much less Christian, and as such more likely to support divorce. This is a good thing, not a bad one, and more straight people need to get on board with divorce not less. 

It's not being Gay, it's sodomy that's an abomination.

So to be clear, you don't think that their heightened likelihood for divorce over not being Christian is responsible for an offset? 

Gay Christians are cool.

You mean like the 'It's not gay it's SSA' people? 😂

Same with the conservative ones, and the ones that hate being compartmentalized with the LGBTQ. If I were gay, I'd be like please don't group me with those people. I'm not interested in celebrating sexuality for a living, that's really perverted. 

Well yeah I mean you've even turned your back on women at this point so I can see how you might be more sensitive than the norm. 

And there you are, praising it as though it's some better state of being or even a healthier way to raise a child. You don't praise it out of knowledge or wisdom, you praise it out of ambitious derangement. 

It's statistics. 

Don't hate the player, hate the game. 

Statistics don't support your fantasy though. Statistically, female+female couples has the highest fail rate. To think it should be common for 2 wombs to adopt a child I a recipe for disaster, as damn near all of those arrangements, fail. 

They have maintained a rate equal to if not greater than straight couples when it comes to the results of them raising children, and this is true as well for kids raised by two dads. 

Your stat also is over overall separation and divorce, not that with a child present. It's not mutually exclusive, both can happen independently of the other, and only around 15% of gay couples even have children under the age of 18 according to the US Census Bureau's data as of 2020. 

Spatial Mind said: 

With this, I don't think you respect your Father, nor do I think he instilled any wisdom in his....Son.

Your Mother ( I dare not say her name ) was the boss in the household from the looks of it. Whatever went on in your house, you really don't want to see it again

They're good people, and what you suggest is disgusting just for the sake of serving your own pre-existing argument. 

Are they really ?

Yes, I'm super thankful over what they brought to the table and still am friendly with them to this day. They've always been in my corner, and were very considerate of my needs growing up while always keeping a clear line of communication open for me, allowing me to ask questions and helping me when I needed it. 

I got to go to private school for the majority of my pre-college education, always had food and fresh clothing, a collection of videogames, young age access to the internet with my own computer, pets we raised together, and my father was even a teacher at two different schools I went to. 

Even my college education was paid for a full four years by my mother, I can't not be thankful for their sacrifices. 

Because you don't want to see men and women together your childhood growing up with a Father and Mother must've been a terrible experience.

Why would how well my parents did have to be a reflection across every man and woman? They behave very much as what were exceptions at the time, trendsetters effectively flipping roles before it was normal. 

Mine were unusual and very progressive for their time, and flipped the expected gender norms of the time. Hell my dad was the one with long hair while my mothers kept hers short and punk when they first met. They if anything largely agree with many of my points about how men are terrible from having lived their own lives for this long, and as Men are Cooked it's a joke we as a family can share. 

To be clear my folks are both Feminist, so we have much of the same data to work from. They raised me in California so that I would not be intolerant of others over matters of race, sex, and gender attraction. 

You really seem to wish your Father wasn't there and instead some strange woman raised you as she'd lick your Mother's vagina while you slept. That is after all, your dream for the rest of the world.

My dad's more motherly than any other woman my mother's probably ever met, and it's squick that you'd try to make it sexual as if from my own POV. 

and I don't blame you, but not every household has a poor excuse of a weak man as a parent, to a point where his son has hopes and dreams of male extinction, where humans are born out of test tubes, and vaginas has less purpose in a Godless world.  

He knew martial arts and proved himself 'a man', he just happened to take up the role of raising a child from already having been the oldest sibling in his family. 

He had the training to be a mother, while she grew up on Murphy Brown. It was weird then, but it's normal now. 

So he wasn't masculine. 

Not that it's inherently masculine to learn martial arts, but he has a black belt in multiple styles and otherwise has had to use it for the sake of the family before. 

I've similarly had to step in with my own training when dating people, but I don't find self defense to be an inherently gendered art. If anything women tend to be better at some styles of it, like TKD, over having naturally stronger legs. 

Okay so he had the training to be a Mother. So while it was just you and him, he acted like a female or something, that burned into your puny underdeveloped child skull, and you loved the fucker, who might have been your uncle for all I know, taking up the role of raising a child. In turn you developed into a transexual cause a feminine man was deep seeded into you.

No, he acted like a responsible parent. One can be motherly or otherwise a homemaker without being estrogenic or putting on a dress or whatever. 

He was more equipt for it, my mother has a college degree that she's utilized to make big cash, and once I was old enough to go to school he took up odd jobs and firefighting to fill in the gaps. He cooked the meals, cleaned the house and the like, while my mother was the one filing taxes and budgeting for the month. 

It plays out like a classic married couple if the woman had 'the pants', and didn't seem weird to me so much as my bringing it up with friends had them confused at first. 

He was also proven to be a man cause he knows martial arts. Okay. Men don't usually have to prove they are men but that guy did for some reason. 

Dude grew up on the street, he needed to know how to defend himself, and after enough NDE's anyone with half a brain will try to learn how to fight. 

He worked with Jerry Momoda in the 90's Mhm. I see them together.

Who's Jerry Momoda? 

Edit: Okay I looked him up, some dude from Nintendo and Namco apparently. 

Interesting. 

Your Father is a snowbird. 

His hair is silver now.

He lost a lot of weight. Still a bit hefty, He has a nice career. But he's far away from you.

You're not his only child Nathan. A female ? I can't tell. Is it another transgender ?

Damn. That's your Dad ? He seems nice.

Uhhh, I think you might have found someone else. 

Weird that you'd try to do this as a power play of some kind though. 

It nothing to do with me and it cannot possibly inspire me. When it comes to 2 women raising a little boy, and he's groomed to be a transexual. LOL. Good luck kid, I can't do anything for you. When parents fail their child and lead them astray, the world will fuck them up.  

There's straight kids raised in gay families, just like the movie The Birdcage with Nathan Lane and Robin Williams. 

EDIT: I never responded to this one. 

I was talking about those parents that have a 3 year old transgender. It's the parents that encourage it in those cases. 

I'm not for transitioning kids pre-teen personally, at least not until they perfect it more. 

It's also a really, really, really low amount of people who consider it for their children pre-teen, and people who bring this up tend to be citing only a few stories generally enough to blow it out of proportion. 

SC Chat said:

18:43 Spatial Mind: I also push Quintasia, cause I can. I can make a video featuring her and I won't have to worry about getting sued or some shit

Please let me help you liberate yourself from her. 

You can do so much better. 

Turncoat said: 

SC Chat said:

18:43 Spatial Mind: I also push Quintasia, cause I can. I can make a video featuring her and I won't have to worry about getting sued or some shit

Please let me help you liberate yourself from her. 

You can do so much better. 

 That was me telling Med I would sooner make a video of Quintasian. It's not like I actually did it or want to. Med says she wishes Quintasia well, which is a mature approach.  

.

Anyway Nathan. I responded to everything with flying colours. Everything I mentioned can be confirmed with some simple keystrokes, while the points you state that require research, doesn't have any real findings and fall out of line with common sense. Sure gay couples are adopting, it's unaverage, and according to data, those relationships are unstable so below average. Yes some will be fine. I also don't care about it. 

I once had a gay guy and a bisexual female housemate, she had this girlfriend. Years later I see her on social media, and there they are, with a little boy. I did not ask where the boy came from, but he's the same race as her and her wife. The 3 of them are smiling. One day I'll meet up with them to meet their son.  

The rest of your posts are all a shit show reaction. You'll paint pictures and hear whatever suits your sense of progressive values regardless if it's false compared to reality. 

Men and cooked men are cooked is what you have to say to me over and over again, like a fly trying to beak through a glass jar, then you'll accuse me of turning my back on women and with that and all you deliver you're on your own. 

Do I turn my back on women ? That's a derogatory way to put it, but technically, yes I do with most women by a landslide, as every man should and just look after the ones in their life, which I do. ( We going for steak next week ! I'll talk about my adventures here and we'll have a good laugh. )

I do know who your parents are, where they are, how they live and what they're doing. I'm actually impressed. I like your Father. If I ever meet him, and I can, I'm getting a nice portrait shot of us. A selfie isn't as nice, I'd get someone to take the picture for me while we're talking. I never bothered counting the amount of companies following the company he works for, and it's him representing it with long speeches at seminars in a room loaded with investors and other hotshots.  

I saw your sibling. Your Father presented her ( **** ) and his wife, who we both know know,  He presented them as his Family on a business related site, but they make no mention of you 4000 or so kilometers away from where you are.

I recall you saying how the 2nd born is a lesser produced person from a degraded/used womb certain to dysfunction. I recall listing some of the worlds biggest athletes who aren't first born and included how you'd clearly hate having siblings and would treat them like shit. As it turns out you do have one, and from the looks of it your younger sibling is the one they show off and will be your Father's #1 beneficiary. Following her imminent success. Saw her graduation pic with the parents. Good for them.  

It's amazing how much info one can obtain with just a few breadcrumbs, so thanks for that, it's been very insightful.

I think me learning this is what has you going apeshit right now, swinging low, as if that ever phases me. If anything it signals your issues, meanwhile I think your family are very nice from the looks of it, that's all it took to have you firing away aimlessly as you are. If anyone can fix you at this point, it cannot be me. You're too deranged. 

And no, I don't get off form the hot coals you place on your own head Nate, it's genuinely my preference to stay cool when others end up piercing themselves in some attempt to annoy me. Seriously, it's better to just watch and point things out when God's design play out, and you have an opportunity to become wiser with such experience.

.

.

.

Overall I've enjoyed my visit. Turned out well.

My favorite time this round was with Legga. It was as though the Lord wanted the truth to push its way to the top, then I found, what I needed to know to find him was placed in my lap 5 years ago, and the rest, not too long ago, and it occured to me with precision who he is exactly for real, and it all came together during this short visit as though a higher powered wanted this. Legga is by no means a smallfry, though I've found he does inflate his image quite a bit here. I don't dox and I wouldn't ever dox Legga, even if he had a hard go with me. The price of Doxing someone at Legga's status will come with intense backfire that will haunt my conscious before karmic justice comes for me until any damage he endured would hit me 3 fold. 

It was nice seeing Med as well. Even though Med is quite cold with no sense of humor before warming up, I'm still humored and struggle with trolling her. I hope she learns more about Twin Flames and the Runner Chaser dynamics of it all, as it's the 1 thing that will help improve her situation for the better and increase her success rate with her twin flame, who is without a doubt, Chapo.