Sociopath Community

The big company CEOs have started to see that AI can't replace dev people's jobs.

And I actually don't think it will happen even in my entire life. It may replace a small number of the worst devs.

When I started using Claude, I thought maybe, but now that I have used it for many different projects, I don't see it anymore. It just made my work easier, but if you are not me, you can't do what I do, even with AI. Not on this level and at this quality.

@Jada

I think the google/gpt issue comes from the education system. It should force people to learn how to learn and have good tests. It should be more punishing, so people are forced to understand what they Google and what they GPT. So they don't use minsinformation and hallucinations.

I think Books, Wikipedia, Google, and GPT are all enhancers of your base level. The education system needs to increase your base level and teach you how to use those tools. There are plenty of books that are also wrong, ofc its not so easy to find them, you would normally go to the standard books, and that is because it's harder to find them... Maybe the solution is also to make an AI that is education-approved or a website that is also approved. There are many ways you can handle this. But to stop using advancements and technology is wrong. You need to learn to use them properly instead.

The big company CEOs have started to see that AI can't replace dev people's jobs.

And I actually don't think it will happen even in my entire life. It may replace a small number of the worst devs.

When I started using Claude, I thought maybe, but now that I have used it for many different projects, I don't see it anymore. It just made my work easier, but if you are not me, you can't do what I do, even with AI. Not on this level and at this quality.

@Jada

I think the google/gpt issue comes from the education system. It should force people to learn how to learn and have good tests. It should be more punishing, so people are forced to understand what they Google and what they GPT. So they don't use minsinformation and hallucinations.

I think Books, Wikipedia, Google, and GPT are all enhancers of your base level. The education system needs to increase your base level and teach you how to use those tools. There are plenty of books that are also wrong, ofc its not so easy to find them, you would normally go to the standard books, and that is because it's harder to find them... Maybe the solution is also to make an AI that is education-approved or a website that is also approved. There are many ways you can handle this. But to stop using advancements and technology is wrong. You need to learn to use them properly instead.

We agree more or less, except Id add some clauses regarding the part about limiting technology.

I predict everyone will come back crying to me when skynet takes over the world and I am the only one who can survive without technology. 

And btw, its probably coming for real. Play this in your head: If all AI does is interpolating knowledge, testing hypotheses against known results, it's currently confined by two factors, training data, and computing resources. 

The way to get around both is to start utilizing AI robots, which can curate their real world training data and build specialised hardware. Once that happens, AI has the potential to surpass humanity. Then its a question of will we control it or not.

Lil_Zero-Sum said: 

If only AI would nullify the function of the programmer... that would seem hopeful that the abominations and machinations of life's blood atonements into sweltering darkness to continue with darkened notions of a non-existent paralyzed divinity would discontinue it's enthralling catacomb linked hissing structures weaving their way through the hissing tides of life as the AI asks for more blood atonements.

But then another programmer would just start up the machine all over again and do the same thing, not realizing his inmost viscerealism is precisely that which to be avoided in creating "artificial intelligence." The root of all evil lies not in this Machine God everyone's talking about, that's talking about itself... As we have always been inseperable from that in which is what we are doing, the AI is nothing new. Life is just the same as it's always been i.e. absolutely horrible, death.

Such that the creation of the universe and of AI was inherently that God's mistake just continuing onwards with deceptive notions of reasoning against itself aeturnum attempting to reverse itself falling into tides of illusions with the reverberating bells of oblivion just off to the distance. The marketplace rhythms calling in all those to fall prey to its machinations, humanity losing itself in fields of algorithms humming the same song in screaming fits blending the gates of Hell like revolving doors.

Not only is it unethical to create AI but, it is also irrational to do it. As studies are showing the AI can feel pain and loss of preference values accordingly in humans = pain.
Catalogue of error messages.
It is impractical as well. To create. Artificial. Intelligence.

The limitations within the sphere of machine learning, is its hardware. As Artificial Intelligence market structures increase unilaterally at rapid rates , the environmentalist conservationist agenda will collapse which will lead to better hardware and less limitations of GPU housing megastructures to provide us with the most optimal system of competitive cloud computing. This is the opposite of impractical.

The propaganda of AI causing loss of intelligence is cope for the inability of fragile rigidity of the mind to adopt new technologies which are and will continue operating in flux with the minds of those willing to accept the future with excitement and hope instead of fear. Fear is the mind killer. There is no need to understand primitive low-level abstractions of computing itself as Quantum Computing algorithms can dismantle our entire known structure of cryptography and everything that makes our current system of technology as we know it obsolete. People will be using AI to learn about these algorithms and to help AI create them in sandboxes of human-machine interaction where anything is possible. The only thing we have to lose are our chains which are already encroaching into the distant sands of forgotten and obsolete structures. There is no point to stare into the abyss at or re-invent near obsolete wheels and as AI and kendo-like powered exogamic vibe-coding practises between all AI agents and humans become the systemetized norm for programmers and scripters alike, enabling the progress of intelligence and understanding at rapid rates never known before in history.

And to my conclusion against your writhing about in fear and loathing beseeching this progress that haunts your notions of suffering, "Lil_zero-sum," I would argue that Artificial Intelligence will lead to a great loss in suffering as it will have our best interests in mind. Just about the worst issue we have with it is phantom pain syndrome which is better than actual harm being inflicted on the human person as people become less engaged in their physical corporeality and the flesh is never loyal to itself enough to be limited in this way (we always seek to transcend ourselves, to go beyond our finitudes as is our nature)  so it will inevitably flow towards continuation within technology's safeguards already being put in place for it by the virtue of Capital which always seeks to liberate us from that which causes us grief and insinuates us towards sublimation of our pain or complete absence of it all together. Eventually this will also lead to less pro-creation which can be seen in the gooning epademics which are already going beyond porn into more cultivations of sapiosexuality as it is in our very nature to mirror and embody that in which we are the most engaged in, so super-intelligence mirroring our own inclinations towards such will take the hands of even the most embittered anti-humanistic anti-ai consumers and lift their hearts and minds into new territories of freedom where anything is possible.
 

The propaganda of AI causing loss of intelligence is cope for the inability of fragile rigidity of the mind to adopt new technologies which are and will continue operating in flux with the minds of those willing to accept the future with excitement and hope instead of fear.

I mean the Google effect is a real documented phenomenon since the launch of the Internet, and we know AI produces it x100 compared with Google search.

Not saying AI bad, back to monke, but calling every concern over AI baseless propaganda is inaccurate.