So if it prevented tyranny then why are there still landlords in South Korea? Why is the birthrate crashing?
Why are you tying birth rate to your utopic prosperity. This is your only measure? How about GPD or cost of living, or freedom to own land.
Because the loss of genetic diversity is lethal, and also proves a system dysfunction. If a system is logical, the birthrates will rise as people will not be punished by landlords and wanna be landlords for existing.
Because the loss of genetic diversity is lethal, and also proves a system dysfunction. If a system is logical, the birthrates will rise as people will not being punished by landlords and wanna be landlords for existing.
I happy the birth rate is going down. Too many fucking people on this earth.
Corporatocracy which is literally just capitalism.
I disagree, it's the difference between a few corporations literally controlling government versus the capital itself doing so.
Basically imagine if Samsung was like 1/3 of your government.
Whatever system South Korea has, it worked. It prevented a fake marshal law and tyranny.
The only thing that prevented it was conscription; The citizens were able to outdo their own military from sharing the same training.
Corporatocracy which is literally just capitalism.
I disagree, it's the difference between a few corporations literally controlling government versus the capital itself doing so.
Basically imagine if Samsung was like 1/3 of your government.
lol what do you people think capital is? it is the government and the government extracting the value from labor, not "giving value to labor."
It's literally called Capital.
Corporatocracy which is literally just capitalism.
I disagree, it's the difference between a few corporations literally controlling government versus the capital itself doing so.
Basically imagine if Samsung was like 1/3 of your government.lol what do you people think capital is? it is the government and the government extracting the value from labor, not "giving value to labor."
It's literally called Capital.
Yeah, Capitalism is the one controlled by Capital. Capitalism typically has a ton of different businesses rather than like six controlling everything with 100% room to monopolize their markets. In South Korea their corpos have no competition and can outright write laws, it's a very different model.
By comparison, in a Corporatocracy, even if these corporations were struggling the government itself would lean into helping them pick themselves back up. That is so much worse than writing off bank debts and other shit, it's direct control via the corporations like that of Cyberpunk. A corporatocracy can turn down bribes (capital) if it doesn't meet the bottom line of their interests over a matter of control rather than competition, while capitalism will become opportunism by comparison over said competition being what could ruin them.
As long as it's Capital that guides Capitalism's hand, a business can fail as another takes it's place. With a corporatocracy the country itself is so in deep that a failing corporation means a failing country.
I wish I could remember a saying that was basically, things have logical ends. Capitalism is always about bourgeoisie dominance, and yes that includes the most minimal amount of corporations who "out compete" the rest. You do realize in the US there's only a handful of corporations right? What era do you live in tc?
