You're still confusing the economic framework through which goods are distributed with the labor and resources responsible for producing them. The fact that capitalism currently dominates production doesn't establish that productive activity depends on capitalist ownership.
And what does Kamala Harris have to do with my argument? I never advocated equality of outcome. Even her position isn't relevant to whether income accurately reflects productivity.
A janitor performs directly necessary labor, while someone can accumulate considerably more wealth through passive ownership. Becoming a highly paid engineer can also depend on privileges such as family wealth and educational opportunities.
Nobody disputed that businesses can organize production or create useful goods. The question is whether private ownership and profit extraction are necessary for those functions. You're treating capitalism's current dominance as proof of its necessity.