Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 

The question is moreover if we still need men. 

They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason. 

 I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.

There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done. 

There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive. 

 That's false.

Give it time, it's closer than you think. 

 Faithful bullshit.

Posts: 33415
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

 Your boasting is sub human degeneracy.

Artificial wombs at best will be a convenience and nothing more. It borrows from men and women.

We're not on God's level. 

Satan with time learns more and more ways to twist God's Wisdom, like many other things we've twisted out of shape. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

 Your boasting is sub human degeneracy.

Artificial wombs at best will be a convenience and nothing more. It borrows from men and women.

We're not on God's level. 

Satan with time learns more and more ways to twist God's Wisdom, like many other things we've twisted out of shape. 

 Satan's ways aren't sustainable in practice. No way to prepare for eternity. God's wisdom remains as it is, no matter how many go the way of the fool and perish.

Posts: 33415
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

As I said before artificial wombs don’t matter to this discussion at all. And there is nothing in that 2nd article more than suggesting with incomplete logic that you can make a sperm cell from an egg cell.

They matter a bunch actually, as they offer the means of women not being weighed down for nine months with messy mood swings and eventual childbirth pains. The idea that "women should stay home and take care of the kids" will have one more nail in the coffin when they have no reason to stop working. 

As for effective sperm from a woman, it's about the transmission of genetic material. It's not that crazy of an idea. 

Artificial wombs don’t really change anything related to this discussion, not sure why you feel the need to keep bringing it up.

You're really just stuck on the sperm thing? I'm talking about all the ways men are rendered trivial, as pregnancy is a common go-to over how "women get pregnant" as reason to be less progressive. The idea that they become too heavy and distracted to keep working is used against them, while with an artificial womb they don't ever have to stop. For every little thing that a man can claim to have over a woman, Science has the room to destroy it. 

As time rolls on, there are less and less reasons as to why women cannot do things a man could do while men can't seem to do what women can do nearly as well. 

The artificial womb will not be a big factor at all in the elimination of males.

Why not? I see it as a very empowering step once they stop just being for the rich. 

As for the second part it’s crazy because there is really no reason to believe it’s possible. The idea in itself isn’t “crazy” just completely illogical and more or less preposterous.

There was no reason to think The Internet was possible a century ago. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2266
1 votes RE: women

Some papers on the creation of 'synthetic' life. 

Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome

Nature uses 64 codons to encode the synthesis of proteins from the genome, and chooses 1 sense codon—out of up to 6 synonyms—to encode each amino acid. Synonymous codon choice has diverse and important roles, and many synonymous substitutions are detrimental. Here we demonstrate that the number of codons used to encode the canonical amino acids can be reduced, through the genome-wide substitution of target codons by defined synonyms. We create a variant of Escherichia coli with a four-megabase synthetic genome through a high-fidelity convergent total synthesis. Our synthetic genome implements a defined recoding and refactoring scheme—with simple corrections at just seven positions—to replace every known occurrence of two sense codons and a stop codon in the genome. Thus, we recode 18,214 codons to create an organism with a 61-codon genome; this organism uses 59 codons to encode the 20 amino acids, and enables the deletion of a previously essential transfer RNA.

In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes 

Spermatogenesis is one of the most complex and longest processes of sequential cell proliferation and differentiation in the body, taking more than a month from spermatogonial stem cells, through meiosis, to sperm formation1,2. The whole process, therefore, has never been reproduced in vitro in mammals3,4,5, nor in any other species with a very few exceptions in some particular types of fish6,7. Here we show that neonatal mouse testes which contain only gonocytes or primitive spermatogonia as germ cells can produce spermatids and sperm in vitro with serum-free culture media. Spermatogenesis was maintained over 2 months in tissue fragments positioned at the gas–liquid interphase. The obtained spermatids and sperm resulted in healthy and reproductively competent offspring through microinsemination. In addition, neonatal testis tissues were cryopreserved and, after thawing, showed complete spermatogenesis in vitro. Our organ culture method could be applicable through further refinements to a variety of mammalian species, which will serve as a platform for future clinical application as well as mechanistic understanding of spermatogenesis.

Blastocyst development after fertilization with in vitro spermatids derived from nonhuman primate embryonic stem cells

Nonhuman primate embryonic stem cells can be differentiated into advanced germ cell lineages, including haploid rSLCs. These rSLCs undergo deoxyribonucleic acid decondensation and pronucleus formation/apposition when microinjected into rhesus macaque mature oocytes, which, after artificial activation and coinjection of ten-eleven translocation 3 protein, undergo embryonic divisions with approximately 12% developing successfully into expanded blastocysts.

 Post-gastrulation synthetic embryos generated ex utero from mouse naive ESCs 

In vitro cultured stem cells with distinct developmental capacities can contribute to embryonic or extraembryonic tissues after microinjection into pre-implantation mammalian embryos. However, whether cultured stem cells can independently give rise to entire gastrulating embryo-like structures with embryonic and extraembryonic compartments remains unknown. Here, we adapt a recently established platform for prolonged ex utero growth of natural embryos to generate mouse post-gastrulation synthetic whole embryo models (sEmbryos), with both embryonic and extraembryonic compartments, starting solely from naive ESCs. This was achieved by co-aggregating non-transduced ESCs, with naive ESCs transiently expressing Cdx2 or Gata4 to promote their priming toward trophectoderm and primitive endoderm lineages, respectively. sEmbryos adequately accomplish gastrulation, advance through key developmental milestones, and develop organ progenitors within complex extraembryonic compartments similar to E8.5 stage mouse embryos. Our findings highlight the plastic potential of naive pluripotent cells to self-organize and functionally reconstitute and model the entire mammalian embryo beyond gastrulation.

 Embryo model completes gastrulation to neurulation and organogenesis

Embryonic stem (ES) cells can undergo many aspects of mammalian embryogenesis in vitro1,2,3,4,5, but their developmental potential is substantially extended by interactions with extraembryonic stem cells, including trophoblast stem (TS) cells, extraembryonic endoderm stem (XEN) cells and inducible XEN (iXEN) cells6,7,8,9,10,11. Here we assembled stem cell-derived embryos in vitro from mouse ES cells, TS cells and iXEN cells and showed that they recapitulate the development of whole natural mouse embryo in utero up to day 8.5 post-fertilization. Our embryo model displays headfolds with defined forebrain and midbrain regions and develops a beating heart-like structure, a trunk comprising a neural tube and somites, a tail bud containing neuromesodermal progenitors, a gut tube, and primordial germ cells. This complete embryo model develops within an extraembryonic yolk sac that initiates blood island development. Notably, we demonstrate that the neurulating embryo model assembled from Pax6-knockout ES cells aggregated with wild-type TS cells and iXEN cells recapitulates the ventral domain expansion of the neural tube that occurs in natural, ubiquitous Pax6-knockout embryos. Thus, these complete embryoids are a powerful in vitro model for dissecting the roles of diverse cell lineages and genes in development. Our results demonstrate the self-organization ability of ES cells and two types of extraembryonic stem cells to reconstitute mammalian development through and beyond gastrulation to neurulation and early organogenesis.
Posts: 33415
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

 Your boasting is sub human degeneracy.

Artificial wombs at best will be a convenience and nothing more. It borrows from men and women.

We're not on God's level. 

Satan with time learns more and more ways to twist God's Wisdom, like many other things we've twisted out of shape. 

 Satan's ways aren't sustainable in practice. No way to prepare for eternity. God's wisdom remains as it is, no matter how many go the way of the fool and perish.

If you look at history, much of it has been in Satan's shadow rather than God's light.

We also have yet to go extinct as we become increasingly Satanic, so I'd say we're alright. We've been messy as a majority from the beginning of Biblical History, and while we get worse we haven't killed ourselves off yet. 

Until we do, there is no proof of Satan's methods being unsustainable, in fact quite the contrary appears to be true. We have more twisted byproducts around us than we do God-given components to the point that many cannot even imagine a natural life anymore, we are truly Satan's progeny this far along in the timeline. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

As I said before artificial wombs don’t matter to this discussion at all. And there is nothing in that 2nd article more than suggesting with incomplete logic that you can make a sperm cell from an egg cell.

They matter a bunch actually, as they offer the means of women not being weighed down for nine months with messy mood swings and eventual childbirth pains. The idea that "women should stay home and take care of the kids" will have one more nail in the coffin when they have no reason to stop working. 

As for effective sperm from a woman, it's about the transmission of genetic material. It's not that crazy of an idea. 

Artificial wombs don’t really change anything related to this discussion, not sure why you feel the need to keep bringing it up.

You're really just stuck on the sperm thing? I'm talking about all the ways men are rendered trivial, as pregnancy is a common go-to over how "women get pregnant" as reason to be less progressive. The idea that they become too heavy and distracted to keep working is used against them, while with an artificial womb they don't ever have to stop. For every little thing that a man can claim to have over a woman, Science has the room to destroy it. 

As time rolls on, there are less and less reasons as to why women cannot do things a man could do while men can't seem to do what women can do nearly as well. 

The artificial womb will not be a big factor at all in the elimination of males.

Why not? I see it as a very empowering step once they stop just being for the rich. 

As for the second part it’s crazy because there is really no reason to believe it’s possible. The idea in itself isn’t “crazy” just completely illogical and more or less preposterous.

There was no reason to think The Internet was possible a century ago. 

 Wasting extra sperm on artificial wombs will not extend anything. There is no point to be made here. The only sex that an artificial womb would be beneficial for delaying their possible extinction is the male.

Posts: 33415
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

As I said before artificial wombs don’t matter to this discussion at all. And there is nothing in that 2nd article more than suggesting with incomplete logic that you can make a sperm cell from an egg cell.

They matter a bunch actually, as they offer the means of women not being weighed down for nine months with messy mood swings and eventual childbirth pains. The idea that "women should stay home and take care of the kids" will have one more nail in the coffin when they have no reason to stop working. 

As for effective sperm from a woman, it's about the transmission of genetic material. It's not that crazy of an idea. 

Artificial wombs don’t really change anything related to this discussion, not sure why you feel the need to keep bringing it up.

You're really just stuck on the sperm thing? I'm talking about all the ways men are rendered trivial, as pregnancy is a common go-to over how "women get pregnant" as reason to be less progressive. The idea that they become too heavy and distracted to keep working is used against them, while with an artificial womb they don't ever have to stop. For every little thing that a man can claim to have over a woman, Science has the room to destroy it. 

As time rolls on, there are less and less reasons as to why women cannot do things a man could do while men can't seem to do what women can do nearly as well. 

The artificial womb will not be a big factor at all in the elimination of males.

Why not? I see it as a very empowering step once they stop just being for the rich. 

As for the second part it’s crazy because there is really no reason to believe it’s possible. The idea in itself isn’t “crazy” just completely illogical and more or less preposterous.

There was no reason to think The Internet was possible a century ago. 

 Wasting extra sperm on artificial wombs will not extend anything. There is no point to be made here. The only sex that an artificial womb would be beneficial for delaying their possible extinction is the male.

...uhhh, you might want to watch the video. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: women
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable. 

Are you asking for articles over how things like artificial wombs work? 



Or how babymaking will become less and less about gender? 
https://medium.com/neodotlife/same-sex-reproduction-artificial-gametes-2739206aa4c0

As I said before artificial wombs don’t matter to this discussion at all. And there is nothing in that 2nd article more than suggesting with incomplete logic that you can make a sperm cell from an egg cell.

They matter a bunch actually, as they offer the means of women not being weighed down for nine months with messy mood swings and eventual childbirth pains. The idea that "women should stay home and take care of the kids" will have one more nail in the coffin when they have no reason to stop working. 

As for effective sperm from a woman, it's about the transmission of genetic material. It's not that crazy of an idea. 

Artificial wombs don’t really change anything related to this discussion, not sure why you feel the need to keep bringing it up.

You're really just stuck on the sperm thing? I'm talking about all the ways men are rendered trivial, as pregnancy is a common go-to over how "women get pregnant" as reason to be less progressive. The idea that they become too heavy and distracted to keep working is used against them, while with an artificial womb they don't ever have to stop. For every little thing that a man can claim to have over a woman, Science has the room to destroy it. 

As time rolls on, there are less and less reasons as to why women cannot do things a man could do while men can't seem to do what women can do nearly as well. 

The artificial womb will not be a big factor at all in the elimination of males.

Why not? I see it as a very empowering step once they stop just being for the rich. 

As for the second part it’s crazy because there is really no reason to believe it’s possible. The idea in itself isn’t “crazy” just completely illogical and more or less preposterous.

There was no reason to think The Internet was possible a century ago. 

 Wasting extra sperm on artificial wombs will not extend anything. There is no point to be made here. The only sex that an artificial womb would be beneficial for delaying their possible extinction is the male.

...uhhh, you might want to watch the video. 

 You might want to shut the fuck up.

Posts: 33415
1 votes RE: women

It's actually pretty good, and well paced: 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.