Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

The question is moreover if we still need men. 

They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason. 

 I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.

There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done. 

 Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.

There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them. 

 Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.

It will be able to be artificially created given enough time, and if not we can revisit my edit earlier: 

Turncoat said: 

There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive. 

Even as you are now, imagine a setting where you're basically milked by multiple women to use in the name of science. Would you turn that down? Would you trade your personal autonomy for constant sexual pleasure, free food, free housing, and an internet connection to pacify you? 

 It doesn’t matter they will never acquire enough semen to last forever. The species will be doomed the second either one of the sexes ceases to exist. Women can last alone longer, but until you can prove to me that a woman will be able to consistently get pregnant without anything provided by a human male, I will not believe I am wrong, but even at that point, being the much weaker sex they are not going to eliminate men lol. And unless they immediately kill all males upon birth or modify shit even farther to always be female it just doesn’t matter. There is no infinite future as a 1 sex species. I just don’t see it.

Edit: Fairly Odd Parents Rule 34, page 2

Edit: Fairly Odd Parents Rule 34 page 3

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

The question is moreover if we still need men. 

They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason. 

 I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.

There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done. 

 Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.

There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them. 

 Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.

It will be able to be artificially created given enough time, and if not we can revisit my edit earlier: 

Turncoat said: 

There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive. 

Even as you are now, imagine a setting where you're basically milked by multiple women to use in the name of science. Would you turn that down? Would you trade your personal autonomy for constant sexual pleasure, free food, free housing, and an internet connection to pacify you? 

 It doesn’t matter they will never acquire enough semen to last forever.

They can birth new males, farm them for sperm to make into pseudo-sperm until they are no longer needed, then they can kill them off for food once they are not needed anymore or grow too old to be useful. With artificial wombs they don't even have to carry the child, allowing them to keep working, and then once the child is born it will be raised by AI or through other disconnected means. 

It's so predictable that even Rick and Morty have an episode about it, it's not super out there to think about. 

Women can last alone longer, but until you can prove to me that a woman will be able to consistently get pregnant without anything provided by a human male

You really think we won't hit a point where we could make what is effectively the same as sperm without the help of a man? 

Once you have a woman's genetic material being the impregnating factor, all that remains is the vehicle to get that fem-sperm to the egg. 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

The question is moreover if we still need men. 

They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason. 

 I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.

There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done. 

 Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.

There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them. 

 Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.

It will be able to be artificially created given enough time, and if not we can revisit my edit earlier: 

Turncoat said: 

There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive. 

Even as you are now, imagine a setting where you're basically milked by multiple women to use in the name of science. Would you turn that down? Would you trade your personal autonomy for constant sexual pleasure, free food, free housing, and an internet connection to pacify you? 

 It doesn’t matter they will never acquire enough semen to last forever.

They can birth new males, farm them for sperm to make into pseudo-sperm until they are no longer needed, then they can kill them off for food once they are not needed anymore or grow too old to be useful. With artificial wombs they don't even have to carry the child, allowing them to keep working, and then once the child is born it will be raised by AI or through other disconnected means. 

It's so predictable that even Rick and Morty have an episode about it, it's not super out there to think about. 

Women can last alone longer, but until you can prove to me that a woman will be able to consistently get pregnant without anything provided by a human male

You really think we won't hit a point where we could make what is effectively the same as sperm without the help of a man? 

Once you have a woman's genetic material being the impregnating factor, all that remains is the vehicle to get that fem-sperm to the egg. 

 

 So after eliminating all males you think we will birth some keep them in farms for 13 years or so as something similar to a cow, and then milk them for their semen for all of the women in the world. And no I don’t see how you could make sperm without a man.

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

The question is moreover if we still need men. 

They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason. 

 I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.

There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done. 

 Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.

There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them. 

 Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.

It will be able to be artificially created given enough time, and if not we can revisit my edit earlier: 

Turncoat said: 

There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive. 

Even as you are now, imagine a setting where you're basically milked by multiple women to use in the name of science. Would you turn that down? Would you trade your personal autonomy for constant sexual pleasure, free food, free housing, and an internet connection to pacify you? 

 It doesn’t matter they will never acquire enough semen to last forever.

They can birth new males, farm them for sperm to make into pseudo-sperm until they are no longer needed, then they can kill them off for food once they are not needed anymore or grow too old to be useful. With artificial wombs they don't even have to carry the child, allowing them to keep working, and then once the child is born it will be raised by AI or through other disconnected means. 

It's so predictable that even Rick and Morty have an episode about it, it's not super out there to think about. 

Women can last alone longer, but until you can prove to me that a woman will be able to consistently get pregnant without anything provided by a human male

You really think we won't hit a point where we could make what is effectively the same as sperm without the help of a man? 

Once you have a woman's genetic material being the impregnating factor, all that remains is the vehicle to get that fem-sperm to the egg. 

 So after eliminating all males you think we will birth some keep them in farms for 13 years or so as something similar to a cow, and then milk them for their semen for all of the women in the world. And no I don’t see how you could make sperm without a man.

Moreso noting that it could be done as a feasible model, which in turn demonstrates the increased triviality of men. 

They have a lot more answers for men not being around than men do for women no being around, it is inevitable. 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

The question is moreover if we still need men. 

They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason. 

 I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.

There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done. 

 Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.

There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them. 

 Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.

It will be able to be artificially created given enough time, and if not we can revisit my edit earlier: 

Turncoat said: 

There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive. 

Even as you are now, imagine a setting where you're basically milked by multiple women to use in the name of science. Would you turn that down? Would you trade your personal autonomy for constant sexual pleasure, free food, free housing, and an internet connection to pacify you? 

 It doesn’t matter they will never acquire enough semen to last forever.

They can birth new males, farm them for sperm to make into pseudo-sperm until they are no longer needed, then they can kill them off for food once they are not needed anymore or grow too old to be useful. With artificial wombs they don't even have to carry the child, allowing them to keep working, and then once the child is born it will be raised by AI or through other disconnected means. 

It's so predictable that even Rick and Morty have an episode about it, it's not super out there to think about. 

Women can last alone longer, but until you can prove to me that a woman will be able to consistently get pregnant without anything provided by a human male

You really think we won't hit a point where we could make what is effectively the same as sperm without the help of a man? 

Once you have a woman's genetic material being the impregnating factor, all that remains is the vehicle to get that fem-sperm to the egg. 

 So after eliminating all males you think we will birth some keep them in farms for 13 years or so as something similar to a cow, and then milk them for their semen for all of the women in the world. And no I don’t see how you could make sperm without a man.

Moreso noting that it could be done as a feasible model, which in turn demonstrates the increased triviality of men. 

They have a lot more answers for men not being around than men do for women no being around, it is inevitable. 

 It’s definitely not inevitable lmao, you’re out of your fucking mind.

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Turncoat said: 

Take it up with Science dude, this is what progress looks like. 

Where’s the science what’s the logic.. pretty sure there are more males than females on earth. What’s even going to change that. Just because it’s feasible for a period of time technically does not make it inevitable.