do we need em?
Well in theory once they’re all gone we will definitely go extinct. So they can bear children and otherwise they can sometimes have high sex appeal and are the best candidates in general to potentially be great sex partners (for a male with a penis). Otherwise no.
The question is moreover if we still need men.
They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason.
I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.
The question is moreover if we still need men.
They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason.I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.
There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done.
There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive.
The question is moreover if we still need men.
They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason.I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.
There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done.
Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.
The question is moreover if we still need men.
They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason.I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.
There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done.
Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.
There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them.
Eventually, pregnancy will only be for poor people.
The question is moreover if we still need men.
They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason.I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.
There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done.
Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.
There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them.
Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.
The question is moreover if we still need men.
They are acting threatened by all of this progress for a reason.I mean in theory once all men are gone the species will inevitably be facing extinction no matter how much cum they manage to preserve.
There's pseudo-sperm that can allow the genetic recombination of two women, men are done.
Pretty sure it requires male semen or something. Otherwise it’s very artificial and all of these children will be literally garbage.
There is a ton of funding going into things like artificial wombs, past a point women won't even have to carry them.
Pretty irrelevant seeing as it would still require semen to my knowledge.
It will be able to be artificially created given enough time, and if not we can revisit my edit earlier:
There's otherwise nothing to stop a progressive feminist society from raising men like cattle to keep the species alive.
Even as you are now, imagine a setting where you're basically milked by multiple women to use in the name of science. Would you turn that down? Would you trade your personal autonomy for constant sexual pleasure, free food, free housing, and an internet connection to pacify you?