Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

 If there is no physical attraction, it’s a pointless endeavor. 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

 If there is no physical attraction, it’s a pointless endeavor. 

Enjoyment is pointless? 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

 If there is no physical attraction, it’s a pointless endeavor. 

Enjoyment is pointless? 

 There is no enjoyment at that point?

I AGREE: PHYSICAL ATTRACTION IS PARAMOUNT. 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

 If there is no physical attraction, it’s a pointless endeavor. 

Enjoyment is pointless? 

 There is no enjoyment at that point?

Intelligence isn't enjoyable to you? 🤭

Explains a bit. 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

 If there is no physical attraction, it’s a pointless endeavor. 

Enjoyment is pointless? 

 There is no enjoyment at that point?

Intelligence isn't enjoyable to you? 🤭

Explains a bit. 

Would definitely rather be with an attractive women than an intelligent one. Just like 99% of men.

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Turncoat said: 

Outro said: 

Everyone is attracted to others for physical reasons.

Even Sapiosexuals? 

I think that term exists because people want to feel special and different.

You've never been turned on by intelligence before? 

Sure, but not enough to fuck Noam Chomsky. 

I consider a constellation of personality traits attractive, but they need to be paired with an attractive physical form for me to consider someone sexually attractive. 

Theoretically, if sapiosexuals exist (as in people who legit are sexually attracted to intelligence whilst disregarding appearance), why not retardosexuals, frugalsexuals, extrovertsexuals, introvertsexuals. Eventually you'll end up with what we've actually got, which is sexual preferences based on a combination of factors (of which the physical is an inextricable player). 

Outro said:

why not retardosexuals

While I doubt that'd be the name for it, it essentially exists. 

They tend to have nurturing and controlling traits while finding themselves otherwise uncomfortable with people of a noteworthy intelligence. Them feeling like they have the upper hand to that degree can give them a sense of comfort, control, and power similar to when a shitty dom has a sub sign a dominance contract. 

It reminds me a lot of the Feeder/Gainer relationship, over the one who feeds the other.