To be clear. I'm talking about how science has no idea how anything could have been alive to begin with. Once something dies we cannot bring it back, nor do we have the slightest clue how to bring things to life.
I got that. Yes. Let's say Science does not have any clue about what could explain the origin of life.... So what?
I covered it. Science knows we don't get something from nothing and we are something. Even the big bang theory has it's holes cause in the beginning there was nothing, but for the first and only time energy and matter were created. No one knows what could have caused the movement that ignited the big bang though there are theories that it was a self collapsing wave function, and we know a mind is a self collapsing wave function.
Personally I think all matter in this universe came from another place. A place where the materials always existed without a beginning and it was somehow brought here. As for life it was intended to be as it is. Alive. Maybe science will never get to the bottom of this as long as our civilization lasts.
Sure. Maybe "we" would say it was Thor or Zeus or some shit.
It's 2021 and I'm on another page and I'm not entertaining the "If you were an ancient thinking it was Thor you're an idiot" I'm talking about a consciousness behind creation not what the ancient Greeks thought about lightning.
I understood that. Yes.... But you didn't answer the question. Or perhaps you didn't get the question?
I got the question and I answered it in the first sentence. I can elaborate on it but I'd just be saying a whole lot about nothing cause we know how the weather works, including rain, thunder and lightning.
Suppose I was living in the ancient world and went about following the same "rules" I follow in drawing conclusions now. I would not reach the conclusion that lightning was caused by Thor or Zeus or some shit, unless there is evidence of Thor or Zeus or some shit.
You, on the other hand, would jump the boat with the rest of the ancient people and say it's Thor and Zeus. Because Science couldn't explain lightning...So people inserted Thor and Zeus into the gaps... Just like Science now can't explain the origin of life. So you insert a creator into the gaps.
Well that isn't the case, and secondly I'm not religious nor do I worship God in the same way the religious do in mass. That's your assumption and from my perspective you assume to to be wiser while you think I'm prone to adopting popular beliefs.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, yet in theory it happened in the beginning. While it's a theory no one can confirm or deny this, so there's nothing wrong with questioning that.
Here we're talking about what science does not know. The question was what is the purpose of life. I had my answer and I broke down how every component in your body, the hands, wrist, forearm, elbow, bicep, shoulder for example, has a purpose. No arguing that.
In 2400, future tpp and future SpatialMind reincarnated will have this same debate.... And future tpp will point out "in 2021, people believed that DNA was evidence of God, how is the way you're inserting God into the gap in the knowledge of quantum mechanics any different from how people in 2021 inserted God into gaps in the knowledge about DNA?" And Future SpatialMind responds: "We live in 2400 now, I am not going to entertain some hypotheticals here."
That's pretentious.
As a matter of fact, the DNA is running like software. It's self sustaining within the functionality of procreation and it's still here.
Code is written especially complex code. For this to happened over and over again with so much design and functionality for a single species, let alone countless others on a spec of dust in the universe. To think it happened by accident by the inanimate at such disturbing levels is laughable.
I'm just saying. There is clearly purpose, and with that there is a consciousness behind it all.
I am criticizing your epistemology, not.... whatever you think it is I'm criticizing. The way you go about evaluating the evidence is flawed. You can always insert a God into places where we don't understand things. You are following the same fallacious thinking that led people to hypothesize Thor and Zeus. Hence the question.... which you were unable to answer.
That's your assumption and opinion. I don't give you any merit cause you want to liken me to ancient greeks who I know believed in false gods. I say that aspect of the conversation is backward and a waste of time.
What has substance in this thread ?
Your liver. Has purpose. As does the heart and lungs. Your toes. The blood. There's no denying this. If it makes you feel better call me a Thor worshipper and carry on believing we've been outclassed by the inanimate, cause we've done nothing as advanced as a flea.
