Sociopath Community

LeggaLegga said: 

I think in a very similar way, but without the judgement.

It's helpful to me to think of some people as "awakened" and most people as not. Here, on this forum, I think there have been two awakened people besides myself -- AliceInWonderland and Jim. While I respect SpatialMind in many ways, I am not convinced he's awakened in the sense that I use the word (some people use it differently).

By awakening I mean a profound realization/conviction that rules don't exist. Profound in the sense that it's demonstrated by actions and not just philosophizing or theorizing.

I think of Tryptamine as someone who could potentially go through awakening, but who likely won't. I think of Inquirer as someone who doesn't desire an awakening.

 What a cynical cunt you are. Lighten up a little bit will ya?

Rules don't exist? Sure. Consequences with certain probabilities of happening do exist though.

One time I took tryp on a date and he didn’t say anything the entire time and walked four feet in front of me when entering and leaving the building 

Not sure why he did that to this day. I think I asked him later why he didn’t talk and he said sometimes I just don’t feel like talking. 

the quirks of tryptamine are very amusing. 

user33313 said: 

What a cynical cunt you are. Lighten up a little bit will ya?

I'm a skeptic.

Rules don't exist? Sure. Consequences with certain probabilities of happening do exist though.

I'm not talking about breaking the law. When I referred to breaking "rules", I meant social rules, the law, common sense, physical laws, corporate ladder, pre-requirements for jobs, dating rules. It's closer to believing that everything is achieveable. Many people have those sort of thoughts but never incarnate them. Luna is a great example of a person who's tried to achieve awakening but never did; she's stuck in a deadbeat job in Milwaukee. I'm everything Luna wants to be, in my own delusional opinion, and so is Jim/Alice.

Inquirer is the opposite; he's so dreadfully afraid of looking stupid that he limits himself.

Turncoat said: 

Apologize for what again?

For being a bad friend. I don't keep bad friends, out of principle.

You don't need to double down; the ball is in your court.

LeggaLegga said: 

Turncoat said: 

Apologize for what again?

For being a bad friend. I don't keep bad friends, out of principle.

You don't need to double down; the ball is in your court.

A real friend is honest, rather than just saying what they'd prefer to hear. 

Turncoat said: 

A real friend is honest, rather than just saying what they'd prefer to hear.

What you did was not honesty. It was naive cynicism -- attributing uncharitable motivation to everything I say.

If you aren't going to say (and potentially prove) what that is, then you making this statement is just you being intentionally vague.

And then egging me on and trying to incite me, similarly to what you do to Xena, Inquirer, SpatialMind:

You always look for a dodge when you're losing, you held on much better when it was versus Inquirer.

LeggaLegga said: 

Turncoat said: 

A real friend is honest, rather than just saying what they'd prefer to hear.

What you did was not honesty. It was naive cynicism -- attributing uncharitable motivation to everything I say.

If you aren't going to say (and potentially prove) what that is, then you making this statement is just you being intentionally vague.

He already has in more ways than one in this topic, mostly through showing a sense of ease when it comes to answering questions similar to those you're otherwise prone to dodging.

He even seems capable of inference (as seen in this post), something you seem too afraid to do publicly by comparison.

I expected better from you

So you only like people who agree with you? Jeez.

Interesting tricks for trying to worm out of the argument

Perhaps those are 'by the usual standards' to him? 😆

And then egging me on and trying to incite me, similarly to what you do to Xena, Inquirer, SpatialMind:

You always look for a dodge when you're losing, you held on much better when it was versus Inquirer.

Go figure though that you'd not be interested when you're losing

In the meantime, I was respectful towards you, and in fact still am.

 

You effectively painted a picture of me that is as uncharitable as possible. However, I think if you actually sat down for a moment and thought about how I have behaved, what kind of views I have held over the years, that you'd realize most of this is conjecture with no basis. I reject your psychoanalysis.

LOL Damn Legga, how'd you get Turncoat to be so desperate?

LeggaLegga said: 

And then egging me on and trying to incite me, similarly to what you do to Xena, Inquirer, SpatialMind:

Do you think you're better than them? 

In the meantime, I was respectful towards you, and in fact still am.

You effectively painted a picture of me that is as uncharitable as possible.

AlmightyJim said: 

LOL Damn Legga, how'd you get Turncoat to be so desperate?

The reason behind his attacks, if any, is unclear to me. I'd like to think I was being very respectful.

LeggaLegga said: 

 

 

AlmightyJim said: 

LOL Damn Legga, how'd you get Turncoat to be so desperate?

The reason behind his attacks, if any, is unclear to me. I'd like to think I was being very respectful.

 I think he gave up on trying to get a debate victory, so he is trying to get you to lash out to get a "win", like women do.