Sociopath Community

NotImportant said: 

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

Turncoat said: 

 So I’m always depressed and manic at the same times? 

 Are you going to talk about something other than yourself in my topic? Like perhaps, the composers in question? Perhaps try listening to the last Bach piece I posted and analyze what he did there... Surely someone who is as versed in classical as you claim will be able to figure out the technique and appreciate it.

 Bro, I did that already. I don’t appreciate it. It hurts my ears. 

 Ok, then I'll chalk it up to a difference in musical taste. All in all, and this is an objective fact.... Bach is way more technical and harder to play and in my humble opinion, the best there ever was.

This one is good

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb0UmrCXxVA&t=1793s

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

Turncoat said: 

 So I’m always depressed and manic at the same times? 

 Are you going to talk about something other than yourself in my topic? Like perhaps, the composers in question? Perhaps try listening to the last Bach piece I posted and analyze what he did there... Surely someone who is as versed in classical as you claim will be able to figure out the technique and appreciate it.

 Bro, I did that already. I don’t appreciate it. It hurts my ears. 

 Ok, then I'll chalk it up to a difference in musical taste. All in all, and this is an objective fact.... Bach is way more technical and harder to play and in my humble opinion, the best there ever was.

 I’d say Mozart is the best because his music is more enjoyable and elegant. It makes me want to take up ballroom dancing. It’s peaceful, yet exciting. It’s like a house party that’s under control. It’s calm right now, but anything could happen. I like that a lot. That’s why I like Chapo so much.

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

Mozart melts my heart. His music represents exactly how my brain works. It’s complicated and there are changes in the tempo that seem random, but it’s really just telling a very intricate and varied story about life. Okay, I got a little carried away there, but I get bored of the other two. Beethoven’s my second favorite because I get bored after a longer period of time, but my least favorite is Bach. I can’t handle the repetition. It just feels safe to me and I need excitement, or at least my brain does. Simulation is probably more accurate, but they all have some good songs, but Mozart gets me.

 I wouldn't call Bach repetitious. He touched on a lot of instruments and styles and did a lot of different things with them. Although he is very baroque which might explain how one could view his stuff as less dynamic than others. But anyway he's known for his fugues which involves up to five independent musical lines interlocking on a single musical theme and no other composer has gotten close to him on that style. It's very complex but I'd understand why some don't like him, because the complexity can make it very rich and not suited for casual listening. 

 I love stuff like that. The truth is, I listen to my pandora station called classical music, so I don’t really check who the music is by, I just press the thumbs up button, or the thumbs down button and then keep listening, so what u did to see which one I liked best was listen to the best of each one videos on YouTube and I recognized the first song of each, so I based it off of that song, and I recognized the image of Mozart in the best of video as one I’ve seen a lot as the pictures used on Pandora for the songs that belong to the album or whatever.

I chose Mozart because the first song was so good I washed to finish listening to it before I went to write about it here. I also keep listening to his best of video and haven’t gotten bored of a song yet. Also, the other two, I got bored either within a minute and a half in or four minutes in. I like songs from all of them, but Mozart is addicting. It makes me feel like doing ballet or contemporary dancing.

I skipped ahead in the Bach video and he does have complicated stuff too, but it’s not as inviting. His music that is complicated is too disjointed for me. It’s almost like it never comes together. It’s just pieces of music thrown on top of each other. It doesn’t flow or paint a picture. It’s more like my thoughts if viewed in isolation. They’re chaotic and make no sense when they happen.

They just layer on top of each other, and the only thing that makes them related is that they are happening at the same time/in the same song. Where’s Mozart’s music organized the chaos so it makes sense when you hear it. Kind of like what I do when I write my thoughts down in the chat part of the site. What I’m trying to say is that Bach is more work.

It’s like my brain is trying to organize his notes so they make more sense. It’s probably better for making you smarter, but I always do that 24/7 in my own head. Classical music is supposed to be relaxing for me when I listen to it, but there is a time for Bach, which is when I’m bored. 

 Tell me what you think of this one-

The visualizer of notes may help you make sense of the perceived chaos and see that it is actually quite harmonized. Mind you, Bach actually IMPROVISED this piece when he first made it which is just insane levels of genius.

 

 This is really nice. With the visualizer thing, my brain doesn’t have to do too much work, so I was about to look, listen, and think at the same time. Also, that’s hoe classical music is in my head too, but it’s more like the earthquake reader thing that draws lines on paper. Like the line that shows the stock’s price over time, but it goes with the music.

NotImportant said: 

I recognized the first song of each, so I based it off of that song

That isn't going to inform you of near-anything. 

NotImportant said: 

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

InternetExplorer said: 

NotImportant said: 

Turncoat said: 

 So I’m always depressed and manic at the same times? 

 Are you going to talk about something other than yourself in my topic? Like perhaps, the composers in question? Perhaps try listening to the last Bach piece I posted and analyze what he did there... Surely someone who is as versed in classical as you claim will be able to figure out the technique and appreciate it.

 Bro, I did that already. I don’t appreciate it. It hurts my ears. 

 Ok, then I'll chalk it up to a difference in musical taste. All in all, and this is an objective fact.... Bach is way more technical and harder to play and in my humble opinion, the best there ever was.

 I’d say Mozart is the best because his music is more enjoyable and elegant. It makes me want to take up ballroom dancing. It’s peaceful, yet exciting. It’s like a house party that’s under control. It’s calm right now, but anything could happen. I like that a lot. That’s why I like Chapo so much.

How's THIS for elegant ballroom dancing music?

I don't remember, I think I preferred Beethoven but I'm more of a Schubert and Chopin fan anyways

This will settle the topic once and for all.

Thanks for reminding me. Bach and Mozart are great for checking sound quality when I buy new speakers or headphones  :)

I dont rlly have a preference. Bach, Mozart, Rachmaninoff, Vivaldi. It's all good. I'll even listen to Shostakovich for the profound cultural significance (even tho his style often reminds me of an old Tom&Jerry cartoon)

Tho I do prefer the classics that translate better to metal guitar  :D

Ikr. Classical music snobs hate me for that lol

I prefer beethoven to mozart and am not familiar with bach

anyway, I really like ode to joy