As far as the danger part goes, I challenge you as a white male to go walking outside with a maga hat on to one of these protests.
Only an idiot would go deep into these protests during the heights of COVID. Social, Distancing.
If not for that it'd be worth it.You'd get beaten to say the least.
Now you're getting why I say "it'd be worth it".
I could walk in, enjoy the beating, and then force the discussion. People don't like a pincushion who laughs, trust me.
This is the climate and grip the Left has on this nation. You couldn't even endorse your president without risking losing your life in the streets during these protests. There is no right wing equivalent of this today and if there was the backlash would be tremondous.
Have you even seen what happens when locally racially handicapped people just try to walk around at all, or are you stuck thinking within the privilege of being in Ohio as not a Mexican?
The US isn't just Ohio and California. There's plenty of Right Wing states where you walking around even with a Maga Hat on as your shield could still be dangerous.
This is a war of ideas, the armor is information, and the weapon is charisma's potential for group steering. As I mentioned before, 4chan has showed us that this can be in the hands of anyone, and therefor this issue is more of an invisible hydra than a party problem.
No. To push an agenda like this you really need to pander as a benevolent oligarch in the modern era, doing it for the people and not for themselves. The new formula for the erosion of rights is the facade that you are preserving some for others or keeping people safe. It's a bait that's bitten eagerly everytime because liberals love to condescendingly virtue signal.
You just need to push a large enough body of people these days. Wealth helps, especially when you have access to sound techniques and graphic design to push agendas, but if you want to go into this entire phenomenon you'll need to go even further than politics and even explore how music trends and seasonal affect can push people.
There's a lot more layers here than you're factoring in. It's just about money, and The Left is just a side of convenience. It's human nature to feel like our own idea of "what's right" is worth enforcing, even if our idea of it is just a mirror of the thing we just spent time saying was "bad".>bashes me for believing in Globalist Jewish conspiracy theories
Yes, it's you oversimplifying an otherwise complex issue, acting like it's part of "The Race Enigma" as if that was even important. It's an easy answer that, more than anything, shows me the politics of your more immediate company more than any real sense of research being done (about as much as your rant on white people being the epicenter of developments).
What's more important is how people are affected by sensory nudging. If it turned out to not be "Das Juden", what really changes?
>"There's a lot more layers here than you're factoring in. It's just about money, and The Left is just a side of convenience."
Oh I know this all too well. I've even mentioned this point to you in a different post. The game of politics has been about money, they used to pander left and right but its clear they've taken a side. Do you really expect apple, google and facebook to someday become right wing? lmao
Yes, because things like this have happened before.
Social Climate is short term, and the only reason those companies were budged as they were was over Corporate Ties into the Social Climate. Many prefer freedom, but fear how losing the backing of other companies will hurt their finances, so they pandered to the Social Climate to keep themselves alive like cowards.
Change the social climate and Corporatism will wear a new face.