https://ahrp.org/johns-hopkins-lead-paint-experiment-endangers-children/ sorry all the videos about this have been removed by youtube
Youtube has a tendency to remove "misinformation", so that could have something to do with it depending on the sources.
There's a lot of conspiracy stuff on Youtube, a lot.
As for much of your six year experience, I'd imagine that it'd be a hazy mess with you unsure of even your own behavior during it. If you were thrown onto different meds over and over, adjusting to them, adjusting off of others, that everything's probably a mess to try to look back on.
The fox story for example, I could very easily believe that a med could have you black out calling yourself one for example. The doctor could have been reporting something you'd said as opposed to trying to make shit up.
It's worth considering yourself an unreliable narrator if you want to try to see it from an outside perspective. Deciphering much of what you've said so far almost sounds "business as usual" for the extreme cases, except combined with mental ward practices.
my friends and i all have matching stories. my mom and dad confirm the fox thing, my friend martin had the same fox thing thrown at him, and i know that i know i was in solitary confinement most of the time, i know that, my parents saw films of it, they saw photos, they were there, my friends were there, there are reports i myself have seen on paper about it at my moms house that she keeps in a file, it is true. the thing about my brother is true, my mom heard the screaming to, and so on
https://ahrp.org/johns-hopkins-lead-paint-experiment-endangers-children/ sorry all the videos about this have been removed by youtube
Youtube has a tendency to remove "misinformation", so that could have something to do with it depending on the sources.
There's a lot of conspiracy stuff on Youtube, a lot.
nope this is actually true, ill give you more sources of the same thing, btw i have seen proven true things removed from youtube many times, i have seen damage control on youtube
https://ahrp.org/johns-hopkins-lead-paint-experiment-endangers-children/ sorry all the videos about this have been removed by youtube
Youtube has a tendency to remove "misinformation", so that could have something to do with it depending on the sources.
There's a lot of conspiracy stuff on Youtube, a lot.
here is the new york times https://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/24/us/us-investigating-johns-hopkins-study-of-lead-paint-hazard.html
The experiment elicited a scathing decision by Maryland’s highest court which compared the use of children in non-therapeutic medical experiments to the use of "canaries in the mines"
...that is somewhat reminiscent of our med practices on children as is.
The Lead Paint Study situation sounds like either an oversight or a horrendous choice, but that doesn't necessarily reflect on the rest of that place's work, simply their negligence in this one area.
The experiment elicited a scathing decision by Maryland’s highest court which compared the use of children in non-therapeutic medical experiments to the use of "canaries in the mines"...that is somewhat reminiscent of our med practices on children as is.
The Lead Paint Study situation sounds like either an oversight or a horrendous choice, but that doesn't necessarily reflect on the rest of that place's work, simply their negligence in this one area.
oh and another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/henrietta-lackss-family-wants-compensation-for-her-cells/2017/02/14/816481ba-f302-11e6-b9c9-e83fce42fb61_story.html
oh heres a different thing they did https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2015/04/01/johns-hopkins-university-faces-1-billion-lawsuit/
This was not a Johns Hopkins study. Johns Hopkins did not initiate, pay for, direct or conduct the study in Guatemala.
They didn't even do it themselves, they were just part of the process that had others do it in a completely different location. This is just a case of liability claiming, not anything from their facility itself.
The experiment elicited a scathing decision by Maryland’s highest court which compared the use of children in non-therapeutic medical experiments to the use of "canaries in the mines"...that is somewhat reminiscent of our med practices on children as is.
The Lead Paint Study situation sounds like either an oversight or a horrendous choice, but that doesn't necessarily reflect on the rest of that place's work, simply their negligence in this one area.oh and another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/henrietta-lackss-family-wants-compensation-for-her-cells/2017/02/14/816481ba-f302-11e6-b9c9-e83fce42fb61_story.html
...did you just link me something relevant to the 1950s?
oh heres a different thing they did https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2015/04/01/johns-hopkins-university-faces-1-billion-lawsuit/
This was not a Johns Hopkins study. Johns Hopkins did not initiate, pay for, direct or conduct the study in Guatemala.They didn't even do it themselves, they were just part of the process that had others do it in a completely different location. This is just a case of liability claiming, not anything from their facility itself.
yes they had a role in it https://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bs-md-hopkins-guatemala-suit-20170831-story.html
