Sociopath Community

Xadem said: 

 If justice is relative then the best manner of judgment is to try and remain as objective as possible. Thus, unless Med scammed someone else out of large sums of money, she didn't deserve to get scammed. 

I figure that the objective answer to this is over how it's none of my business beyond the room to voice opinions and speculation. 

Remember when I used to jokingly "pursue" Med and "stalk" her? That was arguably more just than her getting scammed. It made her severely uncomfortable to be stalked. 

Do you think she even reflects on that time now? 

When she has no room to learn anything, it's more on those around her to see what she has to teach. 

Turncoat said: 

Xadem said: 

 If justice is relative then the best manner of judgment is to try and remain as objective as possible. Thus, unless Med scammed someone else out of large sums of money, she didn't deserve to get scammed. 

I figure that the objective answer to this is over how it's none of my business beyond the room to voice opinions and speculation. 

Well, since we're here anyways.. 

Remember when I used to jokingly "pursue" Med and "stalk" her? That was arguably more just than her getting scammed. It made her severely uncomfortable to be stalked. 

Do you think she even reflects on that time now? 

When she has no room to learn anything, it's more on those around her to see what she has to teach. 

Oh absolutely she has forgotten about it. After all it wasn't malicious in the least (as you might know a much criticised staple of my trolling is the general absence of malice!) but it would be a much more poetic and just learning experience don't you agree? 

yes xad, we recognize how ur justice was more morally just than jims, we approve you and accept and love you more than jim now *headpats*

I know, Jim

Xadem said:

I am not entirely sure what lessons can be learned from getting scammed unless she herself can draw a direct correlation between her own wrongdoings, and the 'pain' she inflicted onto others.

This situation to me is the equivalent of beating a dog for pissing on the carpet. It's not a very logical action-consequence. 

Based on what I've seen so far, I'd have far more confidence in the dog. 

Turncoat said: 

Xadem said:

I am not entirely sure what lessons can be learned from getting scammed unless she herself can draw a direct correlation between her own wrongdoings, and the 'pain' she inflicted onto others.

In both cases she'd have to admit to having made a mistake to see where she got lost, so feasibly if the mistake is large enough, it might leave a jarring enough experience to have her analyze the room for her to have made other mistakes. 

Every single case is over how she won't listen to anyone but herself. 

This situation to me is the equivalent of beating a dog for pissing on the carpet. It's not a very logical action-consequence. 

Based on what I've seen so far, I'd have far more confidence in the dog. 

Despite the beating. Now if we were to piss on the dog... 

someone secret said: 

what a good boy

 literal ed tier

someone secret said: 

 we care about the members feelings and we dont want a roastie to ask Good to ban us again like missc did. 

 

lol  Wha...??? I never asked Good to ban you? Why you dragging me into this ffs?