Edvard stated: source post
Turncoat stated: source post
That you admitted it was pride when it was well after the fact instead of when you originally realized that you went too far.
"Oh shit, I didn't mean it like that" would have sent an entirely different message during the event.
That you are going on about this is amazing. I said how things happened and was sincere about it. You complain when I don't admit my faults, you complain when I admit my faults.... The fuck do you want from me?
How do you still not get what I'm saying? You said you saw that you went too far, and out of pride didn't say so during chat. I'm saying that saying so, back then during the event itself, would have been the right move.
The attack, not the apology. You don't like it when people do what you do, and when you do it you somehow don't see yourself as being as low as they are from being absorbed by that moment.
My incident with Alena had little similarity to what happened with blanc.
It still showcases your visual skew.
Apologies are also important, actively trying to mend your mistake is even more important. Stepping on your pride, even if later, means a lot more than not stepping on your pride at all.
That depends on how likely you are to repeat your behaviors after said apology.
Are... you unable to follow a conversation unless it's only about one point? 
You sometimes show ideatic slipping similar to MrOmega.
He's truly next tier. While I did make that comparison myself a while ago, I don't think I'll ever be on his level.
I understand why you say some things, but I'm trying to keep the convo on track and in the relevance zone. ("I am talking about the probability of cancer not about the probability of TS having cancer"... Why are you, Turncoat??)
I like addressing each fraction of a post separately. It was a nitpick on my part that's blown up waaaay more than I expected it to.
You see, this is why I was joking about you being Alzheimer-y. I shouldn't have to explain the same thing to you over and over otherwise.
It's seriously a waste of time, none of it sinks in.
You just said that in the other thread. You're saying it again. I guess you like wasting time then.
It's closer to it being difficult to resist responding. Some part of me thinks you might grasp the point eventually, while the rest of me knows otherwise, shaking my head while the fingers move as if possessed.
So... you would defend yourself against even the most absurd of points?
I am now, since being the most double-standared person here is pretty absurd.
...it's really not that absurd, and it comes up from repeated incidence of it. People bother responding to the repetition since your expression of it isn't trolling.
You use the quotes to attack your lumps.
Back this up? I'm struggling to imagine how replying to each person's quotes lumps people together.
You'll quote someone's post before going into conspiracy lumping about the supposed bandwagon they belong to. You've even done it in this topic.
Even if any cluster of people are working together, it doesn't help your case at all to note and dismiss their weight plainly from that.
