Sociopath Community

"I'd be less skeptical if not for this conversation."

Alright?

"You asked for it as a way to avoid the original question."

No, that is how you kept framing it. I asked it out of curiosity as to what was "off." Because I did not see it myself, it was rational to ask those who might see something for insight. Unfortunately instead of giving a direct answer, you tried to twist the narrative of the conversation into me avoiding if I was fine or not. I simply wondered why you might have thought otherwise.

"Before even factoring in past history, your behavior itself has been notably off. It began as simply that, and Haart basically answered the question for me. With that answer, it's not become this weird attempt to turn the tables, make it not about yourself, issue the attention outward from spotlight pressures."

How so? Again, I was simply curious as to what was "off." Haart did mention behavioral shifts, while before then, you were fixated on the idea that I was avoiding discussing life circumstances.

"People change" seems like a distraction excuse, especially with the use of the word "people" there. It's like the subtext is implying "they can do it, so why can't I?"

You got me. People never change.

Stop implying shit. I mean by this point you seem to be trying to create a self fulfilling prophesy. I would like to hope this is not the case and that you just made a simple mistake. I am good at not implying stuff in general I would say. I am bad at the opposite. I guess we could help each other find middle ground if you struggle with constant false implications. 

Self-righteous hypocrite...

This is getting ridiculous

"Does there appear to be something wrong?" Is quite a typical response when asked if something is wrong, the only way that statement seems irregular is if a certain tone is imagined behind it. If you're going to talk about a shift in his behavior, focus on something with substance to it, possibly something more convicting that he posted or one of his past actions. Let's get to the real root issue here and not focus on the semantics of an ordinary response. 

"Nice attempt to make it about him instead of you... 2/10"

Dani is the only one making rates round this bitch

Tryptamine stated: source post

"You asked for it as a way to avoid the original question."

No, that is how you kept framing it. I asked it out of curiosity as to what was "off."

And even with that answered (by Haart) it soon became about other things. 
 

Because I do not see it myself, it is rational to ask those who might see something for insight.

So you see nothing going wrong right now? 

I can't tell if this is your public answer or if this is some sort of weird blindside. 
 

Again, I was simply curious as to what was "off."

How often is simply curious simply so? 
 

Haart did mention behavioral shifts, while before then, you were fixated on the idea that I was avoiding life circumstances.

Something had to have caused this shift, and you tend to shift related to life context. 
 

"People change" seems like a distraction excuse, especially with the use of the word "people" there. It's like the subtext is implying "they can do it, so why can't I?"

You got me. People never change.

Tryptamine, Lord of the Dodge. 

Agreeing even though you were part of it so you can jump on the self-righteous bandwagon... Your so fickle...

That is fucked up and I refuse to believe that.

Missbehaved stated: source post

I mean by this point you seem to be trying to create a self fulfilling prophesy.

Wait what? How would this situation make Tryp have worse real life circumstances? 
 

Systematic stated: source post

"Does there appear to be something wrong?" Is quite a typical response when asked if something is wrong, the only way that statement seems irregular is if a certain tone is imagined behind it.

...just because you use "How am I ___" as your typical defense to a contrary view of you doesn't mean that it's typical. 

Also, seriously, have you seen his "imagined tone" lately in chat? This isn't typical Tryp, other than past times where there's been something up. 
 

If you're going to talk about a shift in his behavior, focus on something with substance to it, possibly something more convicting that he posted or one of his past actions. Let's get to the real root issue here and not focus on the semantics of an ordinary response. 

Chat, Haart's list of symptoms, his posts in a few topics lately (including this one while it was still on topic), do you need more evidence than that to form a theory? 

not the self-righteous bandwagon, the bitching bandwagon. although i am fickle because i bitch and then happily watch the minions fight when i find it amusing