Edvard stated: source post
But he made a thread to discuss the deletion of some 7 posts in a raw Xena made to bump up a shitpost of Jim, and gleefully deleted 5 videos of Norwegian death metal Xena posted on a thread of Cadaver to piss him off.
Reversing the order of the events serves to make it more confusing. The deletion happened before the chain post questions.
When called out on those being really minor shit compared to SC standards of shitposting, and when other similar instances that didn't get deleted where presented, Turn decided to level up his "lawyer" needs and refuses to delete even the obvious spam now.
I want an agreement on what lines ought to be drawn, and you keep being like "No, just sniff it out". There is a notable divide present between what should and what shouldn't be handled, so I'm effectively sitting back until we can actually define it.
The "lawyer" needs are how to get around this split. Much like the dox agreement, progress will be made through discussion instead of just being like "Just handle it". "Just handle it" is what had "bias" become a slingable insult, so lets rid of the potential for bias.
I see what EmptyGaze is doing blatantly as spam, and my leaving it up is a way to force this discussion to actually happen. Once we get a set of terms this can be handled rather quickly on my end.