Sun Puddles stated: source post
Well, I had asked you to explain how the videos were relevant and ofc you couldnt pass up an opportunity to make it about you so instead you wanted to tell me all about how Cad was lying, and well, its my fault for humoring you. so if that's seen as spam, it was only spam because you can't seem to control your spam from oozing.
Xena Confirmed Spam Artist. You've got the Midas touch (of Spam), everything you touch(comment) turns to spam. Well I guess you can't help it.
You know what? Xena's right. Dexter was banned for spamming, and we should be consistent. =P
Be an ass, but spamming/counterspamming because you don't like what someone said/posted is ridiculous.
5 music vids (which I still don't agree were spam and were removed anyway) on one thread and a dozen counterspam posts do not come close to what Dexter did.
If TC's going to ban me for that, then consistency would be to ban Jim as well for grandpa.
You and sugar both for your excessive repetition of your fictional narratives about my kids.
wooster for her repetition of words like retard and sjw.
Cad for the repetition of the words judas, cockroach and homeless.
jason for posting his dick pics all over hellgone and back.
blanc for spamming chat with the words "I'm drunk"
etc. etc.
In short, to ban me and also apply the rule consistently to everybody who has spammed to the extent that I have, or more, nobody would be left on this forum. Including you, alena.
:D
So, for the sake of arguement, how much would you say is enough to fuck with "usability"? Do we want to have the forum have an entire front page of the same image? Do we want pages worth of "bump" or other non-contributing one word mindless phrases from potentially an entire forum of people?
If copycats (or puppets from the same user) perpetuate cross/chain posting, should it be twice as accepted? I see the potential for abuse if these guidelines are left ambiguous, and if it's just left up to me without a quotable portion I'll resume being seen as the "abuser".