Sociopath Community

TPG stated: source post

Now for instance say person B is in a highly unfortunate circumstance but person A feels bad for him and in some cases helps him even though the unfortunate circumstance was a product of his idiocy,now why should person A help person B?Wasn't this supposed to be survival of the fittest?now one may use the "it's about humanity as a whole and not about one member of a single specie" which does make sense as it keeps the social bond healthy and humanity would thrive as a result if this were to happen on a massive scale,but this brings me to my next issue which is why do we feel bad for those people not even physically healthy and have some genetic complication etc, like the people with ALS,wouldn't survival of the fittest be that these people be discarded and not putting a burden on resources for the "more fitter" humans so humanity as a whole can thrive???

^ I'm talking about this argument. The one in your OP. 

Duh.

You wrote it and you don't even remember now?

Are  you  feeling ok?

bitch has gone full cray sumbudy get the docc!!1!!!1

lol 

>getting triggered to the point that you actually start spamming their thread after they call you an idiot

u make it 2 ez terra bb

What argument are you talking about lmao,are you okay?

Survival of the fittest would equate to fear and paranoia. We wouldn't be literate and we'd have nothing. As a matter of fact, take away all the things made by others, and you'll see that it's everything you own. If it weren't like that, the quality of living wouldn't be the same.

As for Empathy, there is no arguing how it's associated with a higher awareness, which is smarter than being without empathy.

We won't always empathize with just the unfortunate,  though what makes it good for us, is for the same reason it's good for the less fortunate.

When you're broken, and you most likely will be before you physically perish. You still might not understand the concept of empathy. Even the wicked who claim to not feel, seek empathy, lest they waste their time on a foolish quest to be understood for no reason.

In the mind of an atheist, empathy is yet another convenience to add to the countless conveniences coincidence has provided, no matter how sophisticated we are.

Yeah and what part says putting a bullet in someones head is okay?

I even refuted part 1 in my own op retard 

learn to read >_>

i'm not even going to waste my time explaining things you clearly can't understand

Have a good night x

You said "discarded." Like trash.

Are you trying to tell me that you just want to waste a whole heap of taxpayer money bringing 'inferior' people to some garbage dump or smthg? As if they would actually stay where you put them without some serious form of coercion?

And you're not supposed to refute your own argument in your OP you moron.

Learn to write. lol

Well said.

mommy, what's wrong with that old crusty cunt lady?