people on power trips are not exclusive to those with sociopathic tendencies though, is there anyone you were convinced was a sociopath, as opposed to a narc or something else?
"How do you know what dawkins would or would not do?"
I know that he could not have me put to death. Note that I did not say "kill me" or "hire a hit man to kill me." I said "have me put to death." This denotes a legal execution with force of law behind it.
My country abolished the death penalty decades ago. So did his country.
If we're moving into a more hypothetical situation where Dawkins becomes supreme ruler of the G20 (lol) It's still not likely bc his website is full of threads advocating against executing this person or that for far more serious crimes than arguing.
If you want to talk about an actual scenario where Dawkins would be in a position where he could have somebody put to death...
it ain't gonna happen. Dude just had a stroke. He couldn't take the stress of a position that would give him that kind of authority anymore.
"He says that 'mild' pedophilia is OK"
That's possible. That would be one of the points I could argue with him about. I disagree with some of his views that others have quoted. But I take other people's views of Dawkins with a healthy dose of skepticism and try to get it from the horse's mouth before I form an opinion.
leon14 stated: source post
Communism (which requires compulsory atheism) has killed 130 million in a 100 years, a pretty high kill rate true? Its us that have to fight back
I'd say it's mainly the dictatorships hiding behind communism that are to blame for those deaths, not communism itself. And dictatorships can be both secular and religious.
Xena stated: source post
"He says that 'mild' pedophilia is OK"
That's possible. That would be one of the points I could argue with him about.
If he said that, my guess would be that he acknowledges that our biology and sexuality does not neatly match up to our laws (you can technically be a child when you're 17, for example).
Yes that is true, I cannot definitely say that ive met a genuine natural born sociopath but ive met a couple of people who show what can be called 'classic' behaviour such as losing their shit when someone questions something they say is true, or parroting some PC line just to be 'popular' without any understanding of what they were saying
How is it true that a socio lacks a soul? What is your basis for that statement? And what difference does it make if they don't harm anyone?
What if they make it their business to take down those which don't meet their criteria for the right to continue breathing?
How is it that a pedophile can have a soul? And not earn the same "removal for the sake of it" solution?
Xena stated: source post
I could split some hairs with Dawkins too, but he at least wouldn't try to have me put to death for disagreeing with him.
That's a long list of people you'd like to go medieval on, kid.
Are you sure you're up for that kind of slaughter? I mean, what if your intended victims fight back?
Do you at least have a plastic raincoat like Patrick Bateman?
How do you know what dawkins would or would not do?
He says that 'mild' pedophilia is OK
Communism (which requires compulsory atheism) has killed 130 million in a 100 years, a pretty high kill rate true? Its us that have to fight back
Sugar stated: source post
people on power trips are not exclusive to those with sociopathic tendencies though, is there anyone you were convinced was a sociopath, as opposed to a narc or something else?
Yes that is true, I cannot definitely say that ive met a genuine natural born sociopath but ive met a couple of people who show what can be called 'classic' behaviour such as losing their shit when someone questions something they say is true, or parroting some PC line just to be 'popular' without any understanding of what they were saying
Inquirer stated: source post
leon14 stated: source post
Communism (which requires compulsory atheism) has killed 130 million in a 100 years, a pretty high kill rate true? Its us that have to fight back
I'd say it's mainly the dictatorships hiding behind communism that are to blame for those deaths, not communism itself. And dictatorships can be both secular and religious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Militant_Atheists
Communism demands atheism, you also had Calles in Mexico who killed approx 30k clergy
soul stated: source post
Yes that is true, I cannot definitely say that ive met a genuine natural born sociopath but ive met a couple of people who show what can be called 'classic' behaviour such as losing their shit when someone questions something they say is true, or parroting some PC line just to be 'popular' without any understanding of what they were saying
How is it true that a socio lacks a soul? What is your basis for that statement? And what difference does it make if they don't harm anyone?
What if they make it their business to take down those which don't meet their criteria for the right to continue breathing?
How is it that a pedophile can have a soul? And not earn the same "removal for the sake of it" solution?
They have no soul because they cannot relate to those who do
I said most pedos are sociopaths
leon14 stated: source post
Is not the West drowning in self imposed stupidity? You can say 'I do' in a marriage ceremony in a church and then walk out and go to a gay orgy. It is perfectly legal and legally protected. 3rd world filth are plowing into Europe because they smell blood and a dying corpse
What's the problem with being married and yet have gay orgies? You know, apart from a really old book telling you to trust its word.
leon14 stated: source post
Inquirer stated: source post
I'd say it's mainly the dictatorships hiding behind communism that are to blame for those deaths, not communism itself. And dictatorships can be both secular and religious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Militant_Atheists
Communism demands atheism, you also had Calles in Mexico who killed approx 30k clergy
You're trying to say that atheism is bad because secular states are responsible for millions of deaths? If I give you examples of non-secular states committing massacres, have I successfully debunked your theory then?