Sociopath Community

Wut? Whatever happened to good old Xtian charity? Some secondary psychopaths can change.

I've seen it happen. It's a beautiful thing.

"If they cant do harm with their fists they will do it through their mouths, the best thing for them to do is go and establish their own country on an island somewhere and be separate from everyone else"

Do you have a plan on how to do this?

You seem to have several reasons for why it'd be fine to kill someone, correct?

People that:

• - lack a soul
• - 'attack' other people
• - are moral relativists (as seen from a Christian perspective)

Is it a sin to torture these people? Is it okay to kill animals?

I could split some hairs with Dawkins too, but he at least wouldn't try to have me put to death for disagreeing with him.

That's a long list of people you'd like to go medieval on, kid.

Are you sure you're up for that kind of slaughter? I mean, what if your intended victims fight back?

Do you at least have a plastic raincoat like Patrick Bateman?

leon14 stated: source post

 

Inquirer stated: source post

 

leon14 stated: source post

The original commandment from the 10 that Moses got was "Thou shall not murder" not "thou shall not kill". To murder implies you planned and committed it for personal gain, to kill just means either you are defending yourself or others. If you are defending against those who attack for no reason or for personal gain then to kill these people cannot be said to be a sin.

What about sociopaths and other soulless individuals that do not 'attack' you? Would killing them constitute murder or defense?

Sociopaths by their very being will always be malevolent so they may not attack you directly or personally but members in your family or community will be targets of sociopaths. And as sociopaths do not have souls it cannot constitute murder

I don't have a problem with the original premise. However the supporting arguments are based on assumptions. 

"Malevolent" is open to interpretation and dependent which side of the argument you are on. Now, if you wish to link that to your open request to discuss Ponerology, it becomes more interesting.

Inquirer stated: source post

You seem to have several reasons for why it'd be fine to kill someone, correct?

People that:

• - lack a soul
• - 'attack' other people
• - are moral relativists (as seen from a Christian perspective)

 

Is it a sin to torture these people? Is it okay to kill animals?

 

I dont know whether it could be called a sin in the common context, but such things should be done just for the sake of it.

People should not be tortured unless they are witholding info in relation to something like a planned terrorist attack or a kidnap situation etc. Of course there will always be some expected latitude in relation to sadists, eg. a guy who raped and murdered children should be disposed of in a quite unpleasant manner.

Animals should only be killed due to needs (food, prevention of disease spreading, etc) and not in the hustle for a buck commercialism that pervades today.

leon14 stated: source post

 

Sugar stated: source post

how old are you? have you ever had any experiences with a sociopath?

I cant say that ive met a genuine natural born sociopath, but I have encountered people who display similar mannerisms due to their adopting of atheism, marxism, liberalism etc where there are no absolutes except for ones personal comfort zone.

EG. Lazy employees who become tyrant supervisors, bleeding arse liberals who end up on corporate boards and so on.

So, without meeting a natural born, you condemn without understanding on a basis of the assumption of a lack of soul?

Logical fallacy.

I'll not take on the role of the Devil's Advocate, because there are those, labels or not, where the terminal dirt solution would be in order.

I want__?

Your point was rather vague. 

Please clarify.