Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 2829
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

What the hell is this shit? You respond to a post titled "Arseless Chaps" but not mine?! I'm questioning your devotion for me, Eddie...

Posts: 676
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

I understand that there is a boatload of controversy about this thread, but only one thing stands out to me. We were called arseless. Does this mean that we are all Kim Jong Un? How does this work? Which one of us controls the nukes? Or was it just referring to one of us being Kim Jong Un? This is a great mystery that needs solving.

Posts: 1581
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

Turncoat stated: source post

 

Flattering but also inaccurate to do. While we both have views on this matter, we aren't approaching this as a duo out for results, but as two users with our own respective opinions on the matter. 

I don't think she's "full of shit" for the same reasons she does, in fact, I'd say my own findings are closer to finding her "suspicious".

 

 Haart is a very nice person. IMO her flattery lifts my spirits regardless of if they were genuine or not. (I think it is genuine).

Why is she suspicious? What harm could she ever do? Swindle our money? DOX us? Haven't heard her ask any questions relating to personal info.

Posts: 10218
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

Is suspicion only legitimate if it has realistic risks attached?

Posts: 2485
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

Why all this drama. There is no need for this.

Posts: 1121
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

Edvard stated: source post

"why are you taking me literally?" 

I said, you didn't take her reasons for leaving seriously either, not just the flattering thread. Don't backtrack and contradict yourself. Both you and Turn suspected ulterior motives for Haart to write a kind goodbye thread ("Never trust anyone who flatters everyone."). You can't talk of ulterior motive, if you think haart was genuine in her leaving this site.

"Why would you think this is personal, Ed?"

It flew over your head. What I said was: "Do you usually call people out on their bullshit only if you have some personal ego related reason to do so? What has Haart done to you and Crow, then?", after you accused me of calling you out on your bullshit with "zeal" for personal ego-related reasons (haart's flattering or our last argument).

Yes, you did say that I don't take her reasons for leaving seriously.  You said that.  Not me.  In fact, if you'll look back, I already corrected you.  Why are you still harping on this?  Quote where I said anything, anything at all, about her reasons for leaving, and I'll stop laughing my ass off at you making a fool of yourself. XD

As for the latter half, once again, you're treating Turncoat and I as the same person.  He accused you of having ego-related reasons and used the word "zeal".  For the last time, we are not interchangeable.  Where do you get these preposterous ideas?  I swear, you have the mental capacity of a 4-year-old.

Posts: 1581
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

That's the connotation the suspicion seemed to come in.

Posts: 10218
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

I don't feel like I have anything to lose from what she's doing, but it's still enough to raise a wary eyebrow of suspicion.

Posts: 1121
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

Tryptamine3 stated: source post

I think she will be happy with how this thread went.

I think you're right. XD

Posts: 1121
Arseless Chaps (Goodbye)

Edvard stated: source post

"Why couldn't this be more than it appears? Why couldn't this be reflecting something about her? "

It's too far fetched to justify you and Crow calling Haart "full of bullshit". It's much like Xena being called a schizophrenic in the other thread. It's like Crow being called a zoophile because why couldn't she be.

"What makes you assume that Haart must have done something to me for me to be responding to this in this fashion? This is pretty typical behavior out of me."

It was a rhetorical question. You assumed the same about me responding to you. From what I've learned about haart, my own "character assessment", I ended up liking and respecting her. That's enough to make me want to have a say in this topic. This is pretty typical behavior out of me.

"Actually, the zeal thing was me."

I know. By "you" I meant you and Crow. I find it easier to address you two as a package sometimes.

It's too far fetched to think that someone on SC, whom you barely know, and who has repeatedly admitted to being a liar and manipulator... might actually be lying? LOL  Wow Ed.

 

"I know. By "you" I meant you and Crow. I find it easier to address you two as a package sometimes."

WOOOOOOOOW.  Just saw this.  I guess you already know that we're not interchangeable.  You just don't care.  He's apparently accountable for anything I say, as I am accountable for anything he says, just because you find it easier.  That's..... even for you Ed.....

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.