Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 2216
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

(("As I said to Rass, just because you don't remember the thread, doesn't mean it didn't happen.  Go find it.  I'm not responsible for your shitty memory or absences from the forum."))

If I go and retrieve data from that thread. It will be as I, Rass, and TK said it is. The girl begging to have it taken down, and TC will be like "Hold on, I need to make sure it's you". 

(("Once again, you completely miss the point.  It's not about PMing, just because I used the word PM. lol  It's about admitting that it was her info."))

If it's her information or not..... Since removing doxed data is a thing = "There's no damage in removing it." She begged for days....... She was clearly terrified..... 

 

Posts: 605
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

There we go.

Posts: 2485
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

There is no fucking rule about doxing here or how it is handled. Something that may have once been said in a thread, that has long since been buried amid other old threats does not constitute a rule.

Do you expect any newcomers to look for that thread so they can be aware of that so-called 'rule'? 

If it's not mentioned at the top of this forum for all to see, then it is not a rule here.

Posts: 1121
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

Then start a thread about it, if you object to how things are handled around here.  It doesn't negate what Tony said about his style of moderation.  Which is what concerns me.

Posts: 1842
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

Look at us talk! I feel all mature, decent and responsible, and all you's as well!

Fuck. This is scary.

 

Stop it already.

Posts: 1121
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

If that's how you feel about it, start a new thread.

Luna left it up to the community to decide.  After much discussion, the rule to which I've been referring was agreed upon by a considerable number of members.  Perhaps she should put it at the top of the page.  Or perhaps we should reassess it.  I was against that rule to begin with.  But the fact remains that TC was following the will of the community.  He did not break any rules by leaving the dox up.

More importantly, the real point here, is that Tony has made it clear that he is willing to disregard rules in favour of his "intuition".  That's not a good quality for a moderator, would you agree?

Posts: 2485
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

"If you want the dox rule changed, start a topic on it or revive an older one. I'll follow what's agreed upon."

At the top of the forum it clearly states there is only 1 rule: Do not ruin the usability of this site (such as spam, flooding, or illegal activities).

Nowhere is there any mention of doxing or how it is handled as part of the rules here. Luna didn't include it.

Posts: 2216
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

(("More importantly, the real point here, is that Tony has made it clear that he is willing to disregard rules in favour of his "intuition".  That's not a good quality for a moderator, would you agree?"))

 

HAHAHAHAHA

Say's you.

When I brought up the Pink incident to TC a few weeks ago. It had to do with how he removes doxes due to favoritism. There is no rule for him to take down doxes or leave them up. You brought up my opinion on the pink incident today, now you have TC catching his ass. I just said he was playing favorites, why not admit it ?

And there is no rule here my intuition would violate.

Posts: 1121
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

"If I go and retrieve data from that thread. It will be as I, Rass, and TK said it is. The girl begging to have it taken down, and TC will be like "Hold on, I need to make sure it's you"."

I'm not talking about the Pink dox thread.  I'm talking about the thread where Luna asked the community to set the rules about doxxing.

 

"If it's her information or not..... Since removing doxed data is a thing = "There's no damage in removing it." She begged for days....... She was clearly terrified..... "

Her terror is not his problem. : P  There's no rule against scaring people.  You're a softie.  You'd rather do what makes people feel good, than follow the code of the forum.  Another reason why you'd be a shit mod.

Posts: 2485
Perhaps its time for a 2nd mod?

I'm not saying it should be included. My argument is that there is no rule regarding how it's handled.

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.