tony, do you really believe all this stuff? about thinking it's okay to beat certain women, and haart being a wretched cunt? i'm having a hard time taking it seriously
"You can say, Sugar and Haart are lovely and intelligent, you're saying it directly to me out of spite, they don't agree with you, and nothing more."
Oh, I think they'd at least agree that they're lovely and intelligent. ; ) And I happen to be entirely genuine in saying so. The fact that you think a compliment to them is actually a masked insult to you, says a lot about your character.
As for the topic of sexism, I haven't read enough of their posts on the matter to know whether or not we agree, but is that really important? Do I need to have them take my side, in order to respect their intelligence? If I assumed that everyone who disagrees with me is stupid then I'd be... well I'd be you, now wouldn't I? : )
"No joke, but this kind of material can physically cause cancer."
Oh god, guys. We're giving Tony cancer. : D
(("To some women, yes. And to you, having a penis makes you the victim of some kind of unfair conspiracy."))
To a feminist = There is a conspiracy involving men. Which is why haart is the way she is. I've been vocal against feminism, and no, I don't think having a penis makes me a victim of some kind of unfair conspiracy.
The rest of what you wrote is more hot air that agrees with your head first programming to turn on me.
Non progressive dunce people. You. Ed. therealsugargirl. the 3 of you. dunce. So dunce.
(("You say you're not the victim of a sexist conspiracy, and yet you believe that I only disagree with you because I have been programmed by society to "turn on you", for... being male?"))
There you go spiraling in the wrong direction again. It's not really that important to anyone if you get it right or not, or if you mix or include yourself with other cases. However you take it, I made no assumptions.
You can say, Sugar and Haart are lovely and intelligent, you're saying it directly to me out of spite, they don't agree with you, and nothing more.
I need more progressive material, and not this garbage. Sugar, I'm not all that disappointed in her. Crow would rather flock with people who don't agree with her, I can't worry about that either. People want to talk to me about haart.
No joke, but this kind of material can physically cause cancer.
(("Oh, I think they'd at least agree that they're lovely and intelligent. ; ) And I happen to be entirely genuine in saying so. The fact that you think a compliment to them is actually a masked insult to you, says a lot about your character."))
You complementing them while responding to me. Me as in, I haven't been very impressed with these two people, and your complementing them, AT me. Not you complementing them in a response to them.
Yeah, real genuine crow.
"To a feminist = There is a conspiracy involving men. Which is why haart is the way she is. I've been vocal against feminism, and no, I don't think having a penis makes me a victim of some kind of unfair conspiracy.
The rest of what you wrote is more hot air that agrees with your head first programming to turn on me."
You say you're not the victim of a sexist conspiracy, and yet you believe that I only disagree with you because I have been programmed by society to "turn on you", for... being male? Being anti-feminist? Move along folks, no conspiracy theories here. ; D
"Non progressive dunce people. You. Ed. therealsugargirl. the 3 of you. dunce. So dunce."
I'm fine being lumped in with the likes of Sugar and Haart. Lovely, intelligent ladies. : )
Yeah, but that doesn't mean I'd be fighting her.
And I said she needs a slap, like a month ago, and here you are flocking up with people who want to bring it up now, like the groupthinker you are.
.
.
.
The problem with some women, is they don't want to believe there is such thing as grown up females who still need their malicious ass dealt with.
Like it's fine to hit a guy, and it's fine for a woman to hit a guy, but if a guy delivers a well deserved slap to a woman, all hell breaks loose. I disagree with that logic.
Some women, DO need a beating, why argue that ?