You're a piece of toast. You don't have an alignment.
A bit of both. I had probably perceived myself as chaotic for a number of reasons. For instance, there a period of time I was rapidly shifting lines of work after abruptly leaving the security job I held for a year. Really I was not being chaotic...I had just grown bored of a line of work that I didn't find particularly stimulating, and made the decision to try new things out.
With one exception, I've been a model employee at every job I've worked since about July 2013, and have received a few calls from managers asking if I would like to return to work for them. I was drinking heavily, which does cause me to act chaotically, but again I was good about keeping aspects of my life compartmentalized. I was nearly always a diligent person until the responsibilities of the day were taken care of.
Most importantly, I had no inkling of what I wanted to do next, which I rationalized as an inability to have and fulfill a long-term plan for my life. I felt chaotic because of that. In reality, I had simply not yet stumbled upon some some clear vision of how I should move forward in life in a pragmatical manner. I've had a particular outcome for myself in mind for a long time, but had not yet seen a practical means to that end.
first of all, ask TC if he thinks i'm really sugar, cos if not how would i know what he PMed me a while back? i hope that clears it up. also, i took no offense to your placement of me, whether it suggested mental illness or not. that was my interpretation of the description to chaotic evil, which i don't think i fit into.
um another thing, tc stated he thought he was lawful evil, while you thought he was lawful neutral and the latter was used in your 'joint' list so i hope you don't mind that i'm taking this as your opinion solely and not his. i thought it was obvious from my last post that i thought you were better suited for chaotic evil as you are a self proclaimed psychopath which is what i felt the description was akin to. often those who have disregard for the rights of others make exceptions (consciously or otherwise) for animals so i don't think that means too much.
"I posted pics bc I'm too lazy to type out the definitions. Duh. Are you trying to tell me you're not familiar with those characters and how they behave? My bad. Look them up on IMDB. The Joker, Heath Ledger style. The Goddess Eris from the cartoon Sinbad and Callisto from the Xena series."
These are rather extreme characters to choose as representatives of the "evil" alignment. What you're doing is similar to using a picture of Sid Vicious as a stereotype for rock stars.
i don't think sugar would mind XP and either way, i'm gonna take this as your opinion as the posts are made by you.
you are self-proclaimed. you denied it to edvard when he commented on you liking puppies and then he came out with this long quote (as he often does) where you start off saying smth along the lines of 'if anything, i'm a psychopath'. that's you proclaiming it. yourself. now if you later decided to take this back that's your perogative but sugar has already filed it away as a confession :D
i think animals and people are two extremely different criteria. often times, people have been hurt by people, so they learn not to trust people or to have contempt for them. with animals it's different. i'm a perfect example too, cos i adore cats and dogs, and don't feel so warm toward people.
I posted pics bc I'm too lazy to type out the definitions. Duh. Are you trying to tell me you're not familiar with those characters and how they behave? My bad. Look them up on IMDB. The Joker, Heath Ledger style. The Goddess Eris from the cartoon Sinbad and Callisto from the Xena series. The 2 chaotic neutral characters are Daryl Dixon and Arya Stark.
You're still not answering my question. Where do you get the idea that I'm chaotic evil? You're the one who seems to be having trouble with all of these definitions. Maybe it would help you to be the one to type it out.
I'd also be interested in reading your definition of "crazy train" Go ahead and type that out for us as well. Enlighten us :D
"many also pay little to no attention to you. "
If you're one of them, that would explain why you can't come up with a decent character assessment of me. Not sure why you keep trying to define smthg you're ignoring. Again, if you're ignoring me, your assessment of me can't be coming from anything I'm doing. So it must come from other people.
No conspiracy, just logic. All of our opinions come from somewhere, Crow. You can't tell a person that you claim to be ignoring that you know anything about her, unless you're the crazy who's spinning delusions.
I have asked him. I'm not saying you're definitely not Sugar, I'm just saying I don't know that you are. Which would make discussing Sugar (you?) with you, a little... complicated? XD
The TVTropes description may be slightly sensationalized, because their examples are all fictional characters, people meant to represent an extreme. I'm basing my opinions purely on the two crossing spectrums of the chart itself.
He always said to me that he'd been more lawful evil in the past, and had since gone in a more neutral direction, still with evil tendencies. And I agreed. We discussed it at length, and at the time, lawful neutral with evil tendencies is what we settled on. If he's since changed his opinion, I can't control that. However, this list was a joint effort. We both discussed each person individually. And in fact, since he knows many people here better than I do, I'd say the list was more like 65% him and 35% me. You can ask him if you don't believe me.
You mentioned so, but I thought it was more joking than genuine. It seemed to imply that you were questioning my opinion of myself more than endorsing it. But if that's not the case, nevermind. And also, since this apparently hasn't been repeated enough, I'm not a self-proclaimed psychopath. I may or may not fit the criteria. I do not know. That's all.
Why would it not mean much, just because it's fairly common?
"Though I'm curious, where do you think I should be on the alignment chart?"
" "So I turned up at his house, and it was full of sculptures of predatory animals," Ronson says. "And he immediately started to talk about how he believed in the predatory spirit, which was word for word what Bob Hare writes about in the checklist: Look out for their belief in the predatory spirit.
But Dunlap managed to turn the psychopath test on its head, Ronson says.
"He admitted to many, many items on the checklist, but redefined them as leadership positives," he says. "So 'manipulation' was another way of saying 'leadership.' 'Grandiose sense of self worth' — which would have been a hard one for him to deny because he was standing underneath a giant oil painting of himself — was, you know, 'You've got to like yourself if you're going to be a success.'" " (Source)
" "But Mr Dunlap has not spent his career as a chief executive—a career spanning seven companies over 15 years—trying to win popularity contests. “If you want a friend, get a dog,†he once advised, echoing President Truman. “I'm not taking any chances—I've got two dogs.†" (Source)
" "No." Dunlap tersely replied...(160) Of the 203 "corporate professionals...including CEOs, directors, supervisors...3.9% had a score of at least 30, which is extremely high, even for a prison population...(162) "He cried when his dog died..." " (Source)
I've seen you as "evil" alignment for quite a while. The "chaotic" bit appears fitting, but I am not entirely certain about it.