I have mild tritanomaly and I still don't see it as blue. I see the altered picture of the dress as very light purple with yellow-shit stripes. You are all a bunch of trolls or even more colorblind than I am.
This is what blue means:
This is what's there:
by NojuanEspecial
So.... I guess I'm the derp, then
Nope, au contraire - you're the only sane person in the room, as far as i see.
Most people are unwilling to dig into matters of external impression, there you get the utter lack of shared reference when they haven't got a fucking clue about the colours at hand as they never bothered to look & see.
Alrighty. In the original post, we're presented with what could be presumed an approximation of some sort of ivory and antique gold in poor lighting conditions.
Then we got an accurate reverse break-down explaining the original colours and the process involved.
What I'm still confused about is what was the point of the original post? Like, that you figured out you can alter colour values digitally? You can count your toes, too?
Not quite sure i can follow your line of reference, granpa. I was referring to actual blank sheets of Arches (Waterford, Windsor & Newton, whatever) to be filled with shapes & colours in order to manifest as cash on the bank balance. Labourous and exhausting if you ask me, "art" is the last resort when demand for 'design' is on the blink.