Sociopath Community

 Maybe, I a dumb, but not the dumbest: 
http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2013/12/jessica_kelly_st_louis_sociopath.php

I don't actually think she is dumb, I think she is far more brave than I am. I respect her.

LoL... No that's right, I guess I just did it the long way without looking at the question.

You meet five inhabitants: Edvard, Jay, Luna, Thrillkill and Silkworm. Edvard says that Silkworm could say that Jay is a Angel. Jay claims, Thrillkill and I are not the same.' Luna says that Thrillkill is a Demon. Thrillkill says,At least one of the following is true: that I am a Angel or that Silkworm is a Demon.' Silkworm says that Edvard is a Demon or Luna is a Demon.

I'll start now, time. list them out like this:

E

J

L

T

S

by Daddy

Good job Ed, how long did it take you?

Have another:

You meet four inhabitants: Thrillkill, Edvard, Luna and Jay. Thrillkill says that Jay
is a demon. Edvard claims that Thrillkill is a demon. Luna tells you that Thrillkill
is a demon. Jay tells you, `Of Edvard and Luna, exactly one is a angel.'

Hint 4 actors and 16 possible combinations (seeing a trend yet?)

This one took me just under 5 minutes to solve.

 First one took about 5 mins I think. This one took like 20 seconds man, maybe you typed it wrong. Edvard and Luna say the same thing, so they can't be different. So Jay has to be a demon, which makes TK an angel, and both Edvard and Luna demons.

Good job Ed, how long did it take you?

Have another:

You meet four inhabitants: Thrillkill, Edvard, Luna and Jay. Thrillkill says that Jay
is a demon. Edvard claims that Thrillkill is a demon. Luna tells you that Thrillkill
is a demon. Jay tells you, `Of Edvard and Luna, exactly one is a angel.'

Hint 4 actors and 16 possible combinations (seeing a trend yet?)

This one took me just under 5 minutes to solve.

by Daddy

LoL... No that's right, I guess I just did it the long way without looking at the question.

You meet five inhabitants: Edvard, Jay, Luna, Thrillkill and Silkworm. Edvard says that Silkworm could say that Jay is a Angel. Jay claims, Thrillkill and I are not the same.' Luna says that Thrillkill is a Demon. Thrillkill says,At least one of the following is true: that I am a Angel or that Silkworm is a Demon.' Silkworm says that Edvard is a Demon or Luna is a Demon.

 

I'll start now, time. list them out like this:

E

J

L

T

S

TK demon

Silk angel

Luna angel

Ed demon

Jay demon

There could be more possibilities, kept trying to find more but got bored and stopped before I found any other.

Spent 15 minutes for this.

Left them in this order because it's the order I got them, easier to follow

These things are cool, maybe we can have some contests with games and puzzles :D

by Daddy

You meet three inhabitants: Betty, Alice and Carl. Betty claims that it's false that Alice is a demon. Alice claims, `I and Carl are different.' Carl claims that only a demon would say that Betty is a demon.

So what they really say:

Betty: Alice is an angel

Alice: I and Carl are different

Carl: Betty is an angel

If angels only tell the truth and demons lie, the only way no contradictions appear is if all three are fucking demons :D

Like, if Betty says the truth then Alice says the truth and Carl is a demon, so he lies all the time. Which means Betty is not an angel so Betty can't say the truth, and you get a contradiction. And so on, until you make all three demons, and everything makes sense.

18 mins

...

I hope computer Daddy didn't get virused.

Anyway, I won and you know it :D

I see what you did there. You equated bad blow jobs to you not liking  them. Which I wrote as separate  variables. 

Dude.. I have no idea what you wrote there, but if you assume the bread is not on the table you get a contradiction. Seriously, try it.

Bread is not on the table is true.

e) The bread is on the table or turquie's mother gives bad blowjobs

so turquie's mother gives bad BJ

g) If I disliked turquie's mother's blowjob then she didn't like my cock up her ass either

so turquie's mother doesn't like cock up her ass

a) Either Jim's mother or turquie's mother likes it up the ass

so jim's mother likes it up the ass

c) Jim's mother likes it up the ass and turquie's mother gives great blowjobs are either both true or false

so turquie's mother gives great BJ

And this is a contradiction. So the bread can't not be on the table, man. It's on the table.

-----

Also if you assume the bread is on the table, you find no contradiction.

Bread is on the table

d) If the bread is on the table then Jim's mother liked it when I fucked her in the ass

so jim's mother likes it up the ass

c) Jim's mother likes it up the ass and turquie's mother gives great blowjobs are either both true or false

so turquie's mother gives great BJ

e) The bread is on the table or turquie's mother gives bad blowjobs

so the bread is on the table, this checks out with smth we already know

b) Jim's mother gives great blowjobs or the bread is on the table

both true so this checks out

g) If I disliked turquie's mother blowjob then she didn't like my cock up her ass either

turquie's mother gives great BJ so this statement is pointless

a) Either Jim's mother or turquie's mother likes it up the ass

we know jim's mother likes it up the ass so this checks out as true also

Everything seems pretty clear to me and my common sense logic… Not sure what you didn't like about it.