Sociopath Community

This question evaluates to:

a. p or q

b. r or s

c. p and t   or  !p and !t

d. s -> q

e. s or !t

f. s or u

g. v -> w

The question seems to come down to c, but there is no way to determine whether they are both true or false.

Because there needs to be at least one standalone proposition or a way to solve for it (for instance using specialization) ie: p and q therefore p or therefore q.

I declare this question to be ambiguous, too little data to make a logical assumption about it.

==================================

That said if you assume both in c are true than the problem evaluates to:

s or !t (using elimination)

t therefore s = Bread is on the table.

=========

or

=========

If you assume both in c are false the problem evaluates to:

p and t

therefore p and t are true

p or q

p

therefore !q

s -> q

!q

therefore !s

s or u

!s

therefore u = its in turks ass

...seriously? You thought that was completely unrelated?

In real life logic isn't just a bunch of letters and exclamation marks, man. Looking at the actual meaning of the sentences helps.

I see what you did there. You equated bad blow jobs to you not liking  them. Which I wrote as separate  variables. 

Why would I call a blowjob bad if I like it? XD I can't believe I have to argue this stuff.

Pretty sure I made the first proposition, man.

The context of a logical puzzle is telling. The level of outside the box thinking needed to understand the message is so low, your argument does you more harm than good.

At least you had no trouble connecting the dots with "jim's mother likes it up the ass" and "jim's mother liked my cock up her ass".

this is so hot... i love it when you talk dirty. It makes me want to slap you hard across the mouth and stain your naughty lips with blood ;)

the comparative was she gives bad blow jobs and that you enjoyed it. You weren't  the  one making the first proposition. That was being said as a matterr of fact. The second one was based on your perception. Those things aren't necessarily the same  thing.

that is your problem. Symantecs matters  it is possible after all that you enjoy bad blowjobs. We can only go on what is explicitly  stated not what is assumed

What happens when he talks clean?