Hmmmnnn. I can't exactly disagree with you.
Comedy is another persons Tragedy.
Someone else's experience or morbidity is an other persons fascination.
Entertainment is another persons mystification.
Possibly.
The best an artist can hope for is a sense of happiness from within.
I don't see Van Gough as starving or struggling. If anything he had conduct disorder issues, and decided to travel the world and live life to the fullest, and that is reflected in his works, or in his paintings where he expressed himself.
Commerical art is something different, and perhaps the truly happy people need not make any severe sacrifices with their core being. Seems to me that him and his brother were in cahoots. One was a little more devoted to the institution and the other couldn't be arsed.
Yeah, you'd starve because if people want art, they want the art to represent themselves. Welcome to fashion, right? I dunno.
If people want experience, they want that, and if they are given things freely, they don't appreciate the journey. Perhaps.
Maybe there is addiction for more, in some regards.
I've never really had any want for shiny things. I'm rather utilitarian or socialist, as one could make a bizarre association.
People want others dreams to come true, so you'll find dancers, and musicians who are suffering out there, moreso than in recent history, being celebrated, perhaps a little more than in the past, but it almost seems to me that there are institutions or huge groups high high up picking and choosing which ones to celebrate.