First of all I really want to congratulate you Turncoat for how you handled this. I find myself 100% in agreement with what you said and how you see this place, and what you want from it. So yeah, I gained a lot of trust in your judgement because it seems to be very much alligned with my own.
by MMP
i guess u never saw this place in ukans time what we got here is pretty tame in comparison
dont know if the fucker got bored or banned but at least he knew how to keep things interesting
some body posting a thousand pics of their dic in a row wuld not have been "spam" it wuld have been just another days craziness and the roasting too was pretty fucking amplified compared to the zoo we have now
back then i used to think this as a sort of mental fight club with no rules
it still is a little bit but its gotten tamer trust me we dont need no rules here
MMP wants the same too. I remember arriving to the old nabble forum when the "mental fight club with no rules" was in full action, and I had the chance to be through it all. It was awesome, and no wonder those of us who know those times want smth similar.
by limey
Okay. I will start with some ideas.
Terms of use
Please read these terms and conditions (“Terms of Useâ€) relating to your use of the Sociopath Community website (the “Siteâ€). By accessing our website, you accept these terms of service in full. We reserve the right to change these Terms of Use from time to time and it is your responsibility to ensure you are aware of any changes. If you disagree with any part of these terms and conditions, do not use our website.
Who we are
......
Restrictions on Use
......
By using this website you agree to these terms and conditions ("the Terms").
All messages are the opinions of the author and are not the views or opinions of Sociopath-Community.com; SC Please note that some of the topics may be intended for use by young people; please have regard to this.
You agree that:
Use by you of the message boards is entirely at your own risk;
You are responsible for the content of the messages you post and any consequences that flow from such posting(s);
SC will not be liable for any errors or omissions in any postings or for any loss or damages incurred as a result of the use of any information contained in the message boards;
SC makes no guarantee or gives warranty of any kind whatsoever (whether express or implied) in relation to your use of the message board(s) or any use by any third parties; and
SC shall not be liable for any loss or damage (whether direct, indirect, consequential, financial or otherwise) arising from the use of (or in connection with) the message board(s).
EDIT
SC does not guarantee that the use of the message board(s) by you will be uninterrupted, error free, free from any third party interference or that the message board(s) will be free from computer viruses or other malicious software.
It is your responsibility to implement sufficient procedures and virus checks (including anti-virus and other security checks) to satisfy your particular requirements for the accuracy of data input and output.
Any information disclosed on the message boards themselves will become public information.
For your own safety you should not disclose personal information such as your email address, home address or telephone number (or any information which would identify you indirectly) on any message board(s).
Alright, these TOS are great. I like how they set the atmosphere haha
by Luna Prey
due to my lack of legal knowledge, idk.....
id like to make it like just a few short sentences if i can to clear my of liability. but ya, i dont want anything to come back to bite me :P
id say dont post any rules.
Yeah, listing rules would be a terrible idea. Why would we want to write down a list of rules which we will obviously break, and make ourselves vulnerable for no reason?
by limey
There's just no point talking bout things that have no hope of changing... I see what you were trying to say, but until today the fact was Luna made the decision on what wasn't allowed to go on here. Yes I agree with transparency within a system like that, but you can't expect the peasants to decide the rules they don't want in the first place.
Think about it logically (you're good at that). It people want no moderation, and a ruler wants full moderation (and has the power to do whatever it wants), what is the best thing that can happen?
Answer: The moderation reduces up to the point that the ruler is willing to accept.
Hence talking about it is pointless (unless like what happened, it causes a decision change by the ruler). You as Luna's henchman could have written some regulations to express the minimal amount of moderation Luna would accept, and saved everyone some time.
Again, I'm arguing semantics here, since Luna is now allowing things to move forward (or backwards depending how you look at it).
What is this, you talking about rulers? This place has no ruler and no henchmen. Luna provides a service to us, she isn't our master. Why are you so eager to consider yourself a subject, when all you do is use a site?
Secondly, I don't agree with rolling over and accepting that "things have no chance of changing", saying how "pointless it is to talk about them". Socio thought WW's muting would have no consequences, it had. You were convinced Luna would stick to her ethics of doxing, you were wrong. Fighting spirit is more productive than a fatalist view of things.
by AerynFrellMe
What if some creeper who is a member of this forum stalks random women on facebook and creates accounts here with their photos and fb info? And what if said random woman/women complain to outside authorities about this forum?
Your disclaimers wouldn't apply to them bc they never agreed to use the site, right?
Yeah, this should also be covered in the TOS. Puppets with friends and family of posters tend to show up around here
by Turncoat
The difference is that, if not for a "no rules" approach, "dealing with things as they come" is the best way to avoid additional rules. Attempting to pre-empt what could harm the place both informs people how to and makes for rules that might not be needed in the first place.
With a "no rules" approach however, one that's purely about avoiding liability, it can be much nicer. Prior to this topic I thought this place wouldn't go that direction, instead spiraling downward as more and more rules were forced onto the place. ToS when "no rules" isn't the case would have risked pushing in that direction.
Also, this website isn't a business, it's not about efficiency, it's about principles.
Agree yet again Turncoat. No rules better than "dealing with things as they come to avoid unnecessary rules", better than "let's think of every possible situation and invent tons of rules and clauses that will only hurt our brains and incite people to find ways around them anyway".