by myrealname
I think there is a distinction between pimp and madam.
Yes, the distinction is gender, as I already pointed out and now, will again:
Procuring (prostitution): Procuring or pandering is the facilitation or provision of a prostitute in the arrangement of a sex act with a customer. A procurer, colloquially called a pimp (if male) or a madam (if female), is an agent for prostitutes who collects part of their earnings.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procuring_%28prostitution%29
Women who are put in executive positions within the sex industry are usually and should be ex-hookers. It's more to do with actually knowing about the business and having the experience to run the women with their confidence. Why would they let you train/manage them if you had no idea about their work?
Bullshit. Should a man also have to be an ex-hooker to be able to successfully manage an escort business? After all, being male alone doesn't give him anymore knowledge of the sex industry than a woman.
I have enough confidence to run and manage an escort business without having to be an ex-hooker myself, and the women I control will know it. I have no doubt of that.
As for pimps, I usually associate them more as muscle.
A pimp is the equivalent of a manager/collection agent. Nothing more, nothing less. Any pimp or madam will protect their assets.
You wouldn't be able to relate to the women on a professional level, but i dare say you would have no problem kicking a guys head when he doesn't pay for his trick.
I can certainly use violence to get what I want if need be, but I don't intend to run the business on my own. I would prefer to run the business with a subordinate male who will do my bidding when requested.
Think about it. Bodyguard/extortionist/enforcer or manager/counselor/friend/mother figure, which would you rather and which would you be better at?
Why only those two choices?
I'm talking about running an escort business, not people smuggling or raising kids.