"well descriptive"?
That's a new compliment.
Your response sounds very smarmy, but it's hard for me to guage intent and tone over the Internet, so I'll humor you.
The main differences you see are mostly adaptations to climate. Things like eye shape,eye color, hair texture, hair quantity, hair color, and of course the ever controversial skin color are all adaptive variants that have been selected naturally and/or sexually over thousands of years. To say any one "race" is more evolved than another would be incorrect on too many levels for me to fully cover. I will leave you with; race does not exist, and each ethnic group is adapted to be optimally successful in the geographic location they spent the most time in. Everything else is culture. Culture is learned, not inherited and therefore had nothing to do with physical anthropology, although there are those who study cultural anthropologists. Culture is not biochemical and it is not limited to people based on genetics.
Common craniofacial features we observe within certain populations (like elongated brain case on Europeans and rounded brain case on east Asians, and it is important to note that these are not races, but rather I am describing populations by geographic origin, within those groups there is phenotypic and genotypic variations galore which we classify as ethnic groups along with the help of cultural parameters) are selected sexually. An exception is teeth, but it's not a big one. People with denisovan DNA have shovel shaped incisors. My boyfriend is one of these.
Please stop using the word "race" pertaining to this subject. It's not scientific, and it's not relevant in any way. Additionally, every person in this planet traces their lineage back to the same woman in Africa, we've all been evolving for the same amount of time, so please get that silly idea of anyone being "more evolved" out of your head. The only people who pitch that idea are racists looking for a justification.