To me, Asians are Pakistani's etc... And Japanese/Chinese, and the like, are oriental.
Sugar, I think frosty said he was 17.
by Dexterity"Everyone has emotion. " BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT WRONG ANSWER
Young man. I understand that you idolize the idea of people being emotionless, so your narcissistic feelings don't get hurt. It's tough for a narcissist sometimes, I know. That video says nothing about a psychopaths emotions. Just that it's out there.
Anger is an emotion, the psychopath and sociopath both possesses this emotion, and it comes about usually instead of shame. They don't feel guilt.
The impulsive nature of these mindsets you idolize, well, the impulsiveness is derived, DRIVEN, by emotion.
In the video you posted there, the psychopath did what he can not to go to jail. For in jail, he would be quite miserable. Desire itself is driven by emotion. Jail sucks.
.
.
.
I'll let you in on a secret. This forum is a lot older than you think. This is the new shell, and with it came a fresh start.
When your excitement simmers down, you may join the rest of the regulars in being damn near sick and tired of talking about sociopaths. Believe me, talking about the same subject daily for years just doesn't happen. You talk about it every single day, like a fan. The things you write about have been done here countless times. Sure it's okay to talk about sociopaths and psychopaths this and that, but for the regulars, or more commonly the ones who been here awhile, It's easy to spot a fan, or a noob, and you're displays on the subject is suggestive of both.
Yes psychopaths have emotions. Without it, buddy in the video wouldn't even try to get out of jail. Happy is an emotion, and I'm sure psychoman was just delighted to have succeeded in fooling the court and playing the system.
Genetic variation between ethnic groups tends to be lower from one side of the globe to another (of geographic, indigenous ethnic groups) than denisovans and neanderthals (which mainstream science would now call a sub subspecies of H. sapien) were within their family groups. This is what core sample DNA testing had told us as we've been mapping the two sub-species' genome over the last decade.
Australoid, mongoloid, caucasoid, and negroid are antiquated (see outdated) terms used by wishy washy scientists of the early beginnings of anthropology when they still used phenotypic observation and external measurements (including phrenology lol) to distinguish "races" and justify uninformed bigotry. This movement started in the states and later on was a big part in justifying the genocide in nazi Germany.
The fact of the matter is, genetic variation between individuals of different ethnic groups, yes - even between the high rate of denisovan DNA in South East Asians and indigenous Australians/new Zealanders and the high rate of neanderthal in southern Italians, is usually LESS THAN 5 PERCENT. CORN IS MORE GENETICALLY DIVERSE THAN WE ARE (and sometimes it even seems smarter too) . The upper ranges of denisovan DNA observed in modern humans is in the general area of 10% and the upper ranges for neanderthal DNA observed in modern humans is 5%. Many indigenous African people have no DNA that would not be considered purely H. sapien sapien. And even with all this; denisovan and neanderthal DNA is so similar to the DNA of any other species sapien that we can only tell this through mRNA, and genetic variation between phenotypically very different individuals is genotypically below five percent across the board.
The reason for this lack of diversity is because we are still such a new sub species in the time frame of the earth. Yeah, our ancestors banged other hominid subspecies, yeah we saw ocean levels rise and form new land masses, but the reality is that we are a very young creature. Neanderthals were around much longer before they died out/bred out than we have been today. There hasn't been enough time and separation for genetic drift to really have much of an effect on us.
Good god, I hope at least one of you reads this.
Thank you for the broad explanation. Very informative and appropriate considering today's standards of what we know about the distribution and origins of the modern H. Sapiens.
My point though, was to get the conversation back on track in relation to the origins of certain neuroanatomical differences, that distinguish certain people from the rest of the population. All the racial B.S. (that's not to say I do not enjoy an informative exchange) just diverts attention from what the posts in this forum topic are supposed to be oriented towards.
Crap, now I sound like a moderator.
What I'm saying is that "race" has nothing to do with it, and providing evidence, since some people keep bringing it up.
I've been searching and can find no articles (aside from sensationalized news and alien/conspiracy theory sources) that talk about the elongated skulls found. I can't even find the names of the Spanish anthropologists who supposedly said it was alien. I'm calling hoax. No reliable sources; that don't fly in our field.
I don't think you're going to find many adherents to the magical way of thinking in here (aside of a few paranoid personalities).
What exists, exists. What doesn't exist, doesn't. Most subscribers to this forum follow this ontological principle in here, and thankfully the empirical method tends to be a golden standard as well.
That is not to say, that speculating about what we do not know yet is to be discarded as childish wishy-washy, willy-nilly path to pursuing alethological and epistemological goals.
by Frosty Blue
Also if asians are the most evolved then why are they like all the other races besides caucasians in how they look quite alike, and have a lot of the same repeating features while caucasians have the most diverse look from even the closet proximities of each other.
Because all Asians are made in China.
We are cheaper to produce by making us all the same.
So we can save up all that extra money we save, working three jobs while living in a hole in the basement, buying out American institutions out of debt, and taking over the world.
We do not need to differentiate ourselves. We are Borg.
by emilynghiem
by Frosty Blue
Also if asians are the most evolved then why are they like all the other races besides caucasians in how they look quite alike, and have a lot of the same repeating features while caucasians have the most diverse look from even the closet proximities of each other.
Because all Asians are made in China.
We are cheaper to produce by making us all the same.
So we can save up all that extra money we save, working three jobs while living in a hole in the basement, buying out American institutions out of debt, and taking over the world.
We do not need to differentiate ourselves. We are Borg.
That's hilarious.
...But also scary at the same time, because it's true.