I'm not going to go into depth unless I really believe someone is interested/will listen. As of yet, I'm not convinced.
It's a lot of effort to go to to type up the origin of man on a touch screen just to get "lol u r dum" as a response.
I have no idea were sugar got the proposal to remark about that small insignificant argument that lasted for only like 4 post's. Don't even remember if that was in this topic or not. But to answer the question, no I don't fiddle with random acquaintance's penis' unless they seem to have a bubbly personality, unfortunately for dex though hes autistic so the chances of that happening to him look pretty bleak.
I don't think you understand;
Anthropology and macro evolution are my shiznit. It's impossible for me to be short and sweet on the subject because the subject is deep and meaningful to me.
Saying "y'all are misguided" it the closest I can get without getting too stirred up.
To say "race is a myth which is culturally concocted to explain melanin variation and various phenotypic minutia by a species that seeks unrealistic structure from forces that we adhere to (as opposed to the forces adhering to our preconceived notions)" Is just the tip of the iceberg.
H. sapiens sapien is one of the least genetically diverse species (and even sub species) of great ape in fossil history, and to deny that would be to deny mainstream science. If I'm talking to the sort of people who turn a blind eye to university studies and DNA evidence because they think it's some sort of "alien conspiracy" then I'm wasting my time.
I'm not talking the wishy washy pseudo science that is psychology. I'm talking the shit you can apply the actual scientific process to, and the information that has evolved over the last century and is increasing in its depth and gravity every year. Yes, our conclusions change, yes new evidence is always turning up; it's the beauty of the scientific process. ALIENS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. It's also in no way proper evidence to justify racism or racial profiling with.
So the short and sweet of it is; "y'all are misguided".
Perhaps we should delve into the distinctions stemming from the encounters Homo Sapiens had with Neanderthals and the Denisovans? There are definable genetic differences between Sub-Saharan Africans, Caucasoids, Mongoloids and Australoids, just as there are differences within each one of these groups. We could even talk about the similarities between the San people and the Vietnamese. Oh, the diversity of topics we could discuss in here.
But shouldn't the focus within this forum be more in regard to certain traits that define the label psychopath/sociopath/ASP, that appear within all these races?
"Also if asians are the most evolved then why are they like all the other races besides caucasians in how they look quite alike, and have a lot of the same repeating features while caucasians have the most diverse look from even the closet proximities of each other."
are you telling me this didn't remind you of dex? anyway, if frosty is 16 or under, i'll leave him alone ;)
by thesugargirl"Also if asians are the most evolved then why are they like all the other races besides caucasians in how they look quite alike, and have a lot of the same repeating features while caucasians have the most diverse look from even the closet proximities of each other."
are you telling me this didn't remind you of dex? anyway, if frosty is 16 or under, i'll leave him alone ;)
That ? No way. Dex rarely makes good points where as Frosty always does. Do I think Frosty is a white supremest at heart ? It humors me.
About what Frosty wrote and why it makes sense. Simply. It does.
- East Asian people. ALL, have black hair, dark brown eyes. They do vary in skin tone. They have slanted eyes, some even more slanted. Most have straight hair, some have wavy hair. It's possible for unsual features to come about, but on the most part it is rare.
- Black people are similar in those features within their own too. Dark eyes curly hair. They too vary in skin tone, some dark to near real black, while most of them aren't that dark. On a rare note they can have a red tone in their hair, and sometimes a silvery shade in their eyes. Blue eyed Black person is extremely rare, almost a myth and whatever other details I may miss.
The bottom line is the majority of the above mentioned have typical features within their own uniqueness. Same can be said for natives or East Indians.
White people ? It's not uncommon for them to have all kinds of hair, and all kinds of coloured eyes and hair colour. They even have black hair like the rest of the world, same with dark eyes.
As a matter of fact, whites are the most colorful of the bunch. You can make them turn red, and blue and white, and by default they too vary in skin tone. When making descriptions in search of criminals, the report will require more work and detail if the suspect is Caucasian.
So you see Sugar, Frosty's point is valid.