Sociopath Community

So you choose to strive for poverty? That's unusual. Not good or bad. Just unusual.

Compensatory? Not really. I'm usually only checking the person's qualifications, business plan, trying to grasp his/her expectations in the social setting in question. I see myself as laying a foundation for reasonable interactions. My best guess would be that they see me as somehow challenging their authority when I scrutinize it.

I usually don't actively go looking for vanities to kick. But for some reason I tend to find them all too often.

by AerynFrellMe

So you choose to strive for poverty? That's unusual. Not good or bad. Just unusual.

 No.  Financial poverty is something largely out of my control - something I happened to be born into.  Changing that would make no sense on the cost:benefit ratio.  What I strive for is a quality of life (material things included) what pleases me.  The skill is how to obtain that, bypassing the financial means. 

I'm usually mistaken for filthy rich. Without trying to look it.

Who exactly mistakes you for filthy rich?

Blah. Nvm. ^ That's the self defeating scrutiny I'm talking about.

Have fun with your toys :D

"Nope. I have all that plus brains. I was also extremely pretty once."

so you yourself are a narc and just can't stand competition, because your no longer in that position anymore>

Your opinion is that your not but it's obvious you are. masking is a shallow road to walk.

you also said that rich people are charismatic....oook? how does money make you charismatic? there are loads of neurotic rich men and women that are not charismatic. we are seeing your confusion.

by AerynFrellMe

Who exactly mistakes you for filthy rich?

Offline strangers  (people who don't know me).  

by AerynFrellMe

 Not really. I'm usually only checking the person's qualifications, business plan, trying to grasp his/her expectations in the social setting in question. I see myself as laying a foundation for reasonable interactions. My best guess would be that they see me as somehow challenging their authority when I scrutinize it.

 That was really funny. 

As if you were in a position to check, let alone scrutinize, any of those things.  They fall way outside of your graspable points of reference. 

Even if i told you about my business model/plans, social settings, et cetera, likely you wouldn't comprehend with 1/100 of it.  Not that I'd fault you for that, just the claim that you "usually" check any of those things is hilarious.

Oh boy. We've got ourselves a cherrypicker here :P

 I scrutinized people when I was pretty, too. I got the same results I get now, depending on whether or not the person wanted to fuck me. My point was that I am all of the above (smart, driven, etc.) AND NOT CHARISMATIC. Hence the lack of success. Reiterating my previous point: People who make it despite being poor and ugly  ARE CHARISMATIC.

Where do you get the idea I'm a narc? I said drive, brains etc. plus used to be pretty. Would a bona fide narc not refer to her looks in the present tense, whether or not there is agreement to back up that belief?

I said RICH PEOPLE CAN'T CONVINCE ME THAT THEY'RE CHARISMATIC bc bobbleheads surround them whether they're likeable or not.

My point for the fourth time:

Popular =/= charismatic.

Rich people can only find out how charismatic they were after they lose their money. Hot people can only find out how charismatic they were when they're no longer hot.

Therefore: A PERSON WHO IS NOT HOT OR RICH who nonetheless succeeds IS CHARISMATIC.

Do you get it now?

How would you know what I'm qualified to grasp?

You’re all over the place. cherry picking? it's called debating your lack of actual facts.

Debate me when you learn how to spell you're :P