You don't have to prove yourself to me, thriller. You're not my type. :p
by Thrill Kill
by prometheusboundby Thrill Kill
No, I like a man who's willing to challenge me. Anything that submits too easy and I get bored of it quicker.
That's why you'd make a great pump-n'-dump if you're looks were great. Being that you're claim is that you're a psychopath, I'm sure you already know that you're just seeing men as a sex objects at that point.
Pump-n-dump, if my looks were great?
Boy, you're just full of compliments, aren't you...
I'm not a whore. I'm the one who chooses who I fuck and I'm the one who tells them we're done when I'm done using them. So, no, I don't think I would make a great pump-n-dump.
guarantee that's part of why women are less happy in the states by and large than they used to be, compared to the same with men. They have too many unrealistic goals and expectations, and get bitter when they don't achieve them.
I find that hard to believe. I'd like to see the research that backs up that claim. You got any?
I'm just being honest with you Thrill. But let's be honest, is it any better than you view men as? So does being a pump-n'-dump really bother you? Whether or not that makes you a whore, has nothing to do with anything I said.
As far as the research, here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcus-buckingham/whats-happening-to-womens_b_289511.html
If you don't like the "liberal media" I have several others where that came from.
by SyntheticThey're simple biology terms used by both men and women equally.
I've heard that its a more logical way of describing what alot of women
call the "Nice Guy vs. Not Nice Guy that I want to Bang" difference.
It's more descript, and makes more sense. We're a sexually
dimorphic species, we have alphas and betas. There are pros and cons to
being either if you want to talk in strictly biological terms, unlike
what alot of these men think.You could make the argument that the people who run those online communities are leaders in a pack trying to create something, but the popularity is dependent on their readers who also self identify as players of a game where the goal is to get laid.
A natural leader is someone who does what he likes and is good at it. These people are trying to craft an image of confidence, and read articles that try to explain how to do it most effectively.
http://www.askmen.com/money/career_400/471_are-you-an-alpha-male-or-a-bully.html
The core of the online 'alpha male' trend is adaptation after feeling victimized by not getting laid - http://www.rooshv.com/you-did-this-to-me
This National Geographic video might help a little to get you to understand:
by prometheusboundI'm just being honest with you Thrill. But let's be honest, is it any better than you view men as? So does being a pump-n'-dump really bother you?
Of course I see myself as better than the men I fuck. I certainly do not consider myself a pump-n-dump, and I already explained why. That title belongs to a whore who is willing to spread her legs (or ass cheeks if it's a guy) for anything that's willing to pay for it.
Going by your own definition, do you see yourself as a pump-n-dump?
I started watching that, but didn't finish it. I'd be willing to discuss a summary, if you're so inclined.
Otherwise, I'll just say that the primate instinct of fighting, fucking and feeding is becoming less and less relevant. Very few alpha males are physically imposing, unless you look at the ones who would be considered a big fish in a small pond.
There's a reason that the stereotypical sci-fi portrayal of an advanced alien race is often humanoids who have evolved beyond secondary sex characteristics. The directive seems to be to move past primitive animal instinct, not to celebrate it.
Many girls are raised to believe they are superior to men and this can have negative repercussions.
When it comes to gender politics, I strongly disagree this is a problem even worth mentioning. In the west, where women's rights are the most established, more than 75% of leadership/political positions are filled by men, women continue to make .70 cents on the dollar for the same work as men, and women's shelters are full of abused women and children in most cities in N, America. Single mothers make up the highest composition of welfare and poverty stats.
Women thinking they are "superior' to men is not a social issue from what I can see.
"Alpha males" … I don't personally prescribe/believe in labels like this. There are people who lead, there are bullies, there are followers and there are all kinds of combos. Men (and women) are complex.
I think confident people, period, are attractive. And one of the greatest signs of confidence is when someone is humble enough to pass the torch when needed and let another take command. Their ego is secure and they are not threatened.
Reducing the sexes to "alphas and bitches" says more about a person's insecurity than about the opposite sex. Chemistry is elusive, but it can also show up in the most interesting of places and is wonderful when found.
by Thrill Kill
by prometheusboundI'm just being honest with you Thrill. But let's be honest, is it any better than you view men as? So does being a pump-n'-dump really bother you?
Of course I see myself as better than the men I fuck. I certainly do not consider myself a pump-n-dump, and I already explained why. That title belongs to a whore who is willing to spread her legs (or ass cheeks if it's a guy) for anything that's willing to pay for it.
Going by your own definition, do you see yourself as a pump-n-dump?
Why would you fuck anything you see as below you? Then again, guess it'd be hard not to when you're the only 'great one' in your eyes. Anyway, I was just speaking to how you'd be seen by the guys that would be willing to fuck you.
I neither fuck nor am fucked anymore. Lost interest in it.
by SyntheticI started watching that, but didn't finish it. I'd be willing to discuss a summary, if you're so inclined.
Otherwise, I'll just say that the primate instinct of fighting, fucking and feeding is becoming less and less relevant. Very few alpha males are physically imposing, unless you look at the ones who would be considered a big fish in a small pond.
There's a reason that the stereotypical sci-fi portrayal of an advanced alien race is often humanoids who have evolved beyond secondary sex characteristics. The directive seems to be to move past primitive animal instinct, not to celebrate it.
I don't disagree that it's becoming less and less relavant. We're becoming less and less sexually dimorphic as well, as the need for stronger and more aggressive males declines with technology.
by PrabbeMany girls are raised to believe they are superior to men and this can have negative repercussions.
When it comes to gender politics, I strongly disagree this is a problem even worth mentioning. In the west, where women's rights are the most established, more than 75% of leadership/political positions are filled by men, women continue to make .70 cents on the dollar for the same work as men, and women's shelters are full of abused women and children in most cities in N, America. Single mothers make up the highest composition of welfare and poverty stats.
Women thinking they are "superior' to men is not a social issue from what I can see.
Not really a gender politics issue, but its still irritating that alot of them do. You can't look at nor be nice to some of them without them thinking you want to get in their pants. Like they're something special.
by Prabbe"Alpha males" … I don't personally prescribe/believe in labels like this. There are people who lead, there are bullies, there are followers and there are all kinds of combos. Men (and women) are complex.
I think confident people, period, are attractive. And one of the greatest signs of confidence is when someone is humble enough to pass the torch when needed and let another take command. Their ego is secure and they are not threatened.
Reducing the sexes to "alphas and bitches" says more about a person's insecurity than about the opposite sex. Chemistry is elusive, but it can also show up in the most interesting of places and is wonderful when found.
You can use PwHT and PwlT instead of alpha and beta if you'd like, because it's been shown that the whole dominance thing corresponds to testasterone. I really don't care what you use.
Why would you fuck anything you see as below you? Then again, guess it'd be hard not to when you're the only 'great one' in your eyes.
I am the most important person in my life. Everyone else is below me. So, yes, it's hard not to fuck someone below me when I don't view them the same way I view myself.
Anyway, I was just speaking to how you'd be seen by the guys that would be willing to fuck you.
Well, I've never been called a pump-n-dump by anyone and I've always been treated respectfully by the guys I've had sex with, so I really don't think it matters.
I am curious though, is that how you think you're sexual partners have viewed you?
Not really a gender politics issue, but its still irritating that alot of them do. You can't look at nor be nice to some of them without them thinking you want to get in their pants. Like they're something special.
Some women just like to flirt for fun, same as men. I think you're just misinterpreting their flirting as them thinking they're something special, when they probably don't even think that at all.
it's been shown that the whole dominance thing corresponds to testasterone.
There are also dominant women, which indicates that testosterone isn't the only thing that makes a person dominant. In my opinion, dominance has a lot more to do with self-respect and self-confidence than anything else.
Women have testosterone as well, so I'm not denying it plays a role. Some of us must have more of it than others.