Sociopath Community

you're an idiot. i agree his latest addition is probably bullshit, but you clearly have no grasp of the law. if his candy had led to several deaths, you still think damaged wouldn't be at fault?

No. What I quoted people as saying might be slightly off as I'm going from memory, but it happened.

by thesugargirl

you're an idiot. i agree his latest addition is probably bullshit, but you clearly have no grasp of the law. if his candy had led to several deaths, you still think damaged wouldn't be at fault?

 They will need proof that he purposefully handed out that candy to people with the intent to cause harm. How well do you think a case like that will stand up in court without any evidence...

You think I'm the idiot, but you're the idiot for thinking there is even a case against him.

He is not at fault for anything that happened after the candy was stolen from his desk.

I believe it's a bullshit story anyway, so what is the point in arguing over it.

but i'm not using my disabled schizoid piece of shit brain to work it out, i'm using a legal framework. "without any evidence"?? you're so fucking stupid, there's no point explaining anything to you. go conspire to leave a piece of gum on the floor or something you badass

Instead of acting like a retarded little bitch, grow up for a moment and explain to me what evidence they have against him.

Bringing candy to work is not evidence that he gave it to them or intended to cause them harm. Duh.

bump