Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
3 / 23 posts
Posts: 300
On the subject of geneticly superior races

 

 

by Paranoidilution

I think you may have missed the first part of her post.

"It's undeniable that Asians have higher IQ's on average, and we also know that African Americans need worry less about skin cancer. "

She's going back to race and generalizing in inaccurately broad terms, and she's comparing a genetic trait (melanin production) to a cultural one (IQ). These are indeed two things I've been trying to stress in my posts are unscientific and bigoted ways of thinking. I feel like I've repeated myself five times, so I think I'm entitled to be a little bit snippy. 

Especially when my input had been discredited simply based on the length of my time here rather than the interactions I've had with people after all the work I put into sharing it (not to mention my college degree lol). 

I think if she really gave two shits about this topic,  she would do more research and find that the information I've shared is very much in line with our modern understanding of genetics and culture. However,  some people are just too comfortable with archaic ways of dividing,  labeling and classifying or own kind. 

 She was talking about what is observable from statistics today, and not what she claims is our genetic capabilities. I find you're usage of the bigot card ironic, aren't you the same person who tried picking on Dex because you claimed he had hypospadias? Perhaps you think she's bigotted, because you're projecting.

by Paranoidilution

I disagree with your perception of her intent. 

I am discussing and have been discussing this topic for days now. 

I am done repeating myself to you and everyone else. Fuck, man,  I tried. Some people are beyond help. 

If you're actually interested in understanding the truth of the matter you'll re-read and research. If you're not, you are welcome to remain in the dark and discuss your ameuter hypothesis based on early 1900s misconceptions of genetics. 

Peace out, homeslice. 

 Her intent is a discussion. I quite enjoy the discussion. It's too bad you're not interested in understanding what its about and what she has to say.

by freebehindmymask

If I remember my studies correctly, isn't the fertile crescent what we now call the Middle East. I don't know if whites came from there. I thought it was mostly Egyptians. As for Asians being superior, hey have the Tiger Moms prodding them to greater achievements.

By the way, I don't think capitalism is a very good thing. Especially now, capitalism is in it's decadent phase and is trending towards fascism.

 Kinda mixed. You have the both middle eastern and Eurasian steppes-based ancestry throughout Europe. The south has more middle eastern ancestry, whereas the northern european ancestry is closer to that found in Ukraine and Russia.

Posts: 2876
On the subject of geneticly superior races

I'd argue that capitalism cannot be really given to NW Europe in terms of credit. I think capitlism is almost a law in the universe. if you have a single consciousness, you don't have much power, but if those consciousness have a way to unite, then they will be stronger as a result. Currency is the thread which unites corporations, organizations, and our entire world. To have currency is to hold all that Humanity has to offer which is of lesser or equal value. It's a very powerful weapon, and it's the strongest who run the world.

I also think capitlism is a process. Each time capitalism has it's effect on a country we see repeating events happen. We see production increase, we see a huge increase in the service industry, I think there will always be an obvious increase in consumerism. I think what it comes down to it in the end though, as the system capitalism has had it's effect on ages, it becomes increasingly efficient, and eventually reaches a point where it has reaches peak efficiency, and at that point I think it will come down to the value of human time. 

I think we see that in developed society such as USA, creative content is quite valuble. Movies, video games, books. Large scale consumer goods are cheap, and it's the items which requires large amounts of Human time and creativity which are most expensive.

So in conclusion. I think capitalism cannot be given creddit to any specific demographic of Humanity. Because it is a process which will always occur so long as the conditions are provided. I also think capitalism is good for the world. In the end, I hope to find ourselves in a society of abundance where material costs are little, and it is the value of the human mind and creativity which has true value. 

3 / 23 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.