Sociopath Community

Or you'd try to out her as a scorned lover.

by anastacia

Or you'd try to out her as a scorned lover.

 She doesn't have lovers.  She has exploits,  I think she said in the book.  Ugh,  devout Morman my foot.  Bisexual sadism and that is today's Mormonism.  Where did we go wrong? 

 Do you mean it would implicate and defame you through some sort of fallout of the whole ordeal?  Or do you mean that she would seek retribution?

 Scorned exploit then. Nice try on the deflection there with going back to Mormanism.

by anastacia

 Scorned exploit then. Nice try on the deflection there with going back to Mormanism.

 You belong to a class of people who do not understand religion, do not understand ethics, were born without a conscience  -  of course you can't figure out why it matters that she is a Mormon, and it matters to Mormons that she came out as a sociopath. 

by smkovalinsky

The higher empath is both more evolved and more adapted than the sociopath,  no matter what the latter try to tell themselves and everyone else.

The higher empath scoffs at much of what passes as "morality" or ethics in mush culture;  However, he has a way of gauging what is just and pragmatic as opposed to what is maladaptive - and this gauging is of a very high order.

Higher empaths make a distinction between dullards who are to be paid no real mind,  and even used afte a fashion,  and people of real value,  who must be respected and viewed in the Kantian sense, as ends in themselves:  Never as means to any end. 

Conversely, sociopaths adhere to no morality, high or low;  they make no distinction between valuable or substandard people -  all are to be used to their petty ends.

Thus do sociopaths show themselves to be unevolved in,  and maladapted to, reality and the laws of evolution. 

 

 Consideration is the offspring of a raised awareness. The consciousness of one who has empathy, is more united with the grand scheme, as opposed to one who strives to solo against all.

by Spatial Mind

 

by smkovalinsky

The higher empath is both more evolved and more adapted than the sociopath,  no matter what the latter try to tell themselves and everyone else.

The higher empath scoffs at much of what passes as "morality" or ethics in mush culture;  However, he has a way of gauging what is just and pragmatic as opposed to what is maladaptive - and this gauging is of a very high order.

Higher empaths make a distinction between dullards who are to be paid no real mind,  and even used afte a fashion,  and people of real value,  who must be respected and viewed in the Kantian sense, as ends in themselves:  Never as means to any end. 

Conversely, sociopaths adhere to no morality, high or low;  they make no distinction between valuable or substandard people -  all are to be used to their petty ends.

Thus do sociopaths show themselves to be unevolved in,  and maladapted to, reality and the laws of evolution. 

 

 Consideration is the offspring of a raised awareness. The consciousness of one who has empathy, is more united with the grand scheme, as opposed to one who strives to solo against all.

 Well said, and bravo to you for it.  As William James said in his Varieties of Religious Experience (1901, Univ. of Edinburgh), the moral person is more adapted to the higher levels of existence.  The sociopath is maladapted,  and belongs to the class of criminals. 

Yes. I'm a sociopath. How did you ever guess? This is why I'm referred to as a squishy empath in multiple threads. I can just see through bullshit. It doesn't take a sociopath to do that.

by anastacia

Yes. I'm a sociopath. How did you ever guess? This is why I'm referred to as a squishy empath in multiple threads. I can just see through bullshit. It doesn't take a sociopath to do that.

 You act as though I am trying to pass something off here.  All I have been is honest:  About my feelings about the author,  about my hopes that she runs into trouble for certain ethical considerations,  about my own philosophy of morality,  and about  my general belief that sociopaths are con-artists -  not born different any more than gays are.  Its all a con to get social equality, and I hope it will be blocked.  Moral laziness should not be upheld as an ideal  Where is the bullshit?  What am I pretending?  

 I agree with this William James quote. It's common sense. In the old forum, I once wrote about what it means to be all knowing. Had we ultimate consciousness, it would be impossible to lie, and a malicious character would be rendered into an animal. For someone who is sociopathic to obtain ultimate consciousness, it would transform them, like anyone really, but they wouldn't be sociopathic any longer, cause they would only hurt themselves by mistreating another, for they will feel, and experience their targets perspective. Knowledge turns the table. Knowing about the malicious levels the playing feild. They are not super human, nor are they equipped with the emotions that make people run faster or push cars sideways in the event they have to save their child.