Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

I swear you're playing dumb on purpose

Explain your rationale what you think is dumb about my post? Or was that just to slide in a snarky comment?

You're better at peanut gallery critiques than direct actions, essentially. When you aren't involved, your comments have a tendency to get to the heart of the point with direct aptitude, whereas when it's you you're stuck with ambiguity, playing dumb, and trying to get others to board your bandwagon-with-the-flat-tire. 

When it becomes about you feeling oppressed, or angry, or having any emotions really you expect special treatment, but when others get special treatment you're one of the first to point it out about them. It gives strong hypocrisy vibes, like for instance your stance on the Edvard/Sturm drama. 

What if it was you being banned for posting stuff of a similar strain? You'd be liable to change camps almost immediately. 

If I ever get banned from here, I'll post CP 24/7 like I did on S-C. :^)

you aren't this basic when you're analyzing other people with yourself out of the equation, only when you're involved in it. 

I use logic.

I suppose your narration would have to change after seeing that your MBTI results you were bragging about are strongly different now. 

Where before you were "a superior mind", now it's "I use logic", but you say that rather baffling things are "logic" as opposed to ego driven "principle". 

I haven't claimed to be a superior mind, don't think so. You're trying hard to paint me as narc or some shit. I've been preferring logic as first step for a long time. Think then act (usually)...

You have nothing to counter it with other than
guessing which sock is mine and which isn't during a "flood" and adding snarky comments with no rationale to shut me up.

You wouldn't cease from either though, you'd feel motivated because you see them as "your enemy", and you want "to win". You change goalposts commonly based on short term gains, not the bigger picture. 

Politics is the way to go for me. I'm not going to make it easy for you to silence me by blatantly posting CP. Instead, I'd rather test your SC values and fight a battle to gain more autonomy for myself and others.

You, along with Edvard have been trying hard to push me into posting it though. Your snarky taunts such as claiming how I couldn't cause any real damage without Jim although I was the one who kept you up in the mornings, etc. and Edvard's attempts to trigger me, because he thinks if I feel rejected, I'd post it. This dip shit is so desperate to win against me, he randomly insults me with irrelevancy to the post/topic that he quotes, either it's retarded and/or genuinely thinks he could piss me off with that so I'd post CP again. Little does he know, I feel alienated and rejected 24/7, been there and done that, 100% immune.

... then he wonders why I take jabs at him...?

You like having a cause, but you're bad at it. You don't even know how to make it look tempting to other people, unlike many who tried this game before you. 

Many have tried... [and failed]!

I initiated the S-C CP spam phase, I'm the reason you're on this site now and not Luna's in short. I will always be an adversary to some members such as Edvard and MissC for what I did and remembered for years, if not decades to come.

I got a lot of support for my cause during it, and now am on free foot after 2 years of S-C scheming, seeking site vulnerabilities, coming up with plans to cause damage despite all of the site impairments and its lock down status. S-C had 5 janitors in the end, the highest janitor count it ever had because of me, never forget. Trying to undermine my accomplishments won't work on the mastermind himself.

I admit that things would've gotten ugly for me if Jim weren't on my side. It's very clear I appreciate him though.

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

I swear you're playing dumb on purpose

Explain your rationale what you think is dumb about my post? Or was that just to slide in a snarky comment?

You're better at peanut gallery critiques than direct actions, essentially. When you aren't involved, your comments have a tendency to get to the heart of the point with direct aptitude, whereas when it's you you're stuck with ambiguity, playing dumb, and trying to get others to board your bandwagon-with-the-flat-tire. 

When it becomes about you feeling oppressed, or angry, or having any emotions really you expect special treatment, but when others get special treatment you're one of the first to point it out about them. It gives strong hypocrisy vibes, like for instance your stance on the Edvard/Sturm drama. 

What if it was you being banned for posting stuff of a similar strain? You'd be liable to change camps almost immediately. 

If I ever get banned from here, I'll post CP 24/7 like I did on S-C. :^)

You see, I assumed my advantage here was that I treat my time as less important than yours, so any time I'd spend addressing your floods would weigh more against you than me. 

With how much ego leaks into your posts, I figured that would support that stance further, but maybe you see your time as that boring and useless instead of it really being a matter of principle. 

you aren't this basic when you're analyzing other people with yourself out of the equation, only when you're involved in it. 

I use logic.

I suppose your narration would have to change after seeing that your MBTI results you were bragging about are strongly different now. 

Where before you were "a superior mind", now it's "I use logic", but you say that rather baffling things are "logic" as opposed to ego driven "principle". 

I haven't claimed to be a superior mind, don't think so. You're trying hard to paint me as narc or some shit.

Maybe I took your INTJGOD topic too seriously, and maybe the tongue in cheek over "mastermind" is snarkier than how fitting it otherwise is. 

You however strike me less as a narc and more as one who's stuck in a compensatory cycle of confusion. 

I've been preferring logic as first step for a long time. Think then act (usually)...

I swear people call their feelings "logical" when they don't want to directly face them or otherwise want to appear to be above feelings, and a lot of your responses are telltale of the similarities. 

In this environment, it takes strength to admit to having feelings, while it's run of the mill to try to say you're practically a hippy automaton. 

You have nothing to counter it with other than
guessing which sock is mine and which isn't during a "flood" and adding snarky comments with no rationale to shut me up.

You wouldn't cease from either though, you'd feel motivated because you see them as "your enemy", and you want "to win". You change goalposts commonly based on short term gains, not the bigger picture. 

Politics is the way to go for me. I'm not going to make it easy for you to silence me by blatantly posting CP.

Good, then the only problem is "flooding". I'd rather things not have to escalate, but this "job" () comes with responsibilities that don't always give me a choice. 

Instead, I'd rather test your SC values and fight a battle to gain more autonomy for myself and others. 

How do you plan on accomplishing this with this strategy? You're juggling a half-baked bandwagon attempt with enough spam to have even past flooders not able to sympathize with you. 

You, along with Edvard have been trying hard to push me into posting it though.

No I'm not, I actually want to have you around, but flooding is a problem that has to be addressed. 

For real, I like having you here, but you have bouts of wild immaturity and demands for special treatment that I cannot get behind that also add up to your only real inconsistent moments. 

Your snarky taunts such as claiming how I couldn't cause any real damage without Jim although I was the one who kept you up in the mornings, etc.

I mean, you couldn't, that's a statement of fact that was meant to taunt a reaction out of you as opposed to just a snarky taunt by itself. The things Jim does have subtle social ramifications, can stir up a bandwagon, and otherwise can be brushed off as "Oh well it's just Jim" from how much others basically hurt themselves on his "Thorn Armor". 

You meanwhile are more on the offense, and it makes you look weaker to the point of alienating your potential supporters. What Jim has in spades for the Charisma game... you aren't even a shadow of, and without his help you will remain alone. 

I am not trying to taunt you into posting CP, I'm just taunting you like I'd do with most people. The only thing that makes you special here is the flooding, and is that really what you want to be known for? 

and Edvard's attempts to trigger me, because he thinks if I feel rejected, I'd post it. This dip shit is so desperate to win against me, he randomly insults me with irrelevancy to the post/topic that he quotes, either it's retarded and/or genuinely thinks he could piss me off with that so I'd post CP again. 

You've shown yourself being triggered into responding emotionally towards him with targeted floods, and otherwise mostly upped your spam game from feeling disrespected. You also say that every person who opposes you is "Ed-like", which gives very clear signs and symptoms that this dude rustles your jimmies on the regular. 

As you said earlier, posting CP is an admission of loss, one people will sympathize with you even less over, so you have little to gain beyond some shock reactions (and I'd hope you're after more than that...). How though is flooding not you making yourself look lesser, when you could otherwise just be replying to people in a sensible, "logical" way? 

Don't get us started

Cawk said:

Little does he know, I feel alienated and rejected 24/7, been there and done that, 100% immune.

Are you though..? 

I think you bring these things up a lot unprovoked from having something to justify. It's like when people say they "aren't mad, just bored", no one actually believes that shit. If anything, how long it's gone on for usually leads to bigger expressions of the issues instead of lesser ones, with numbing doubts as a typical compensation for it.  

I initiated the S-C CP spam phase, I'm the reason you're on this site now and not Luna's in short. I will always be an adversary to some members such as Edvard and MissC for what I did and remembered for years, if not decades to come.

So you're still going with how you "posted 80% of it"? 

How much involvement in it did Jim actually have? Judging from the CP floods, I assumed it was like his "gay bait" gag where he finds one piece of CP and posts it on repeat (until he saw it not working as well anymore, finds one other one, then repeats the gag). 

I just assumed you were a dirty little reposter, suckling up to Jim's example like some sort of apprentice. Were you actually how he found CP? 

I got a lot of support for my cause during it

Ahh, so you're trying to get that feeling back and you're finding it more difficult now?

I'd say, much like the usual for almost anyone's support granted here, that you mostly had apaths and some peanut gallery with the usual moralfags complaining. 

The most damage you caused was triggering the moralfag uproar, and that as a domino effect it was their bandwagoning that gave your movements traction. Now that that's becomes less of a factor though, your sense of power has diminished. 

and now am on free foot after 2 years of S-C scheming, seeking site vulnerabilities, coming up with plans to cause damage despite all of the site impairments and its lock down status. S-C had 5 janitors in the end, the highest janitor count it ever had because of me, never forget. Trying to undermine my accomplishments won't work on the mastermind himself. 

So you're still saying it's not because of Jim? 

Honestly, he did far more damage than you by knowing how to hold back at key points. He has a sense of poise that no one knows what to do with, while you... I think you know by now how I see the style of your behaviors. The force you express makes you seem more desperate than your once mentor. 

I admit that things would've gotten ugly for me if Jim weren't on my side. It's very clear I appreciate him though.

How ugly would you imagine it having gone? Him being the name on the banner did more damage than anything else, especially based on how good he is at antagonizing people without flooding or posting CP. With a petty person behind the actions, they get to walk away with a sense of satisfaction, but when the person has already blatantly bested them prior... they were already helpless from the start. 

When they see him doing it, they don't know what to do like he's some sort of unstoppable force. With you... it's actually kinda funny, and that's why people when they try to shit on you walk away somewhat satisfied instead of feeling rustled. 

Jim has triggered a surprising number of people within the "rules of engagement", and that's where most of my respect for him lies. For you to accomplish that though, you'd have to keep your feelings in a box where no one could see them, or come to terms with said feelings so you could rise above them through experience instead of detachment. 

Bossroach said: 

Don't get us started

Why not let Cawk argue for himself? I mean I know you see (and fetishize) his childish behaviors, but it undermines him and the points he's trying to make. 

You know when people at the park try to feed the birds, and overtime they drop their hunting instincts? You're basically making Cawk into that, and I'd not be able to accuse him as readily about "special treatment" if you weren't a major catalyst for it. 

Without you, he'd have to try a lot harder, and he'd be less of a cheap imitation. 

Cawk wants validation. 

He hates that Jim is getting the cp glory

He hates that TPG and I are seen as the figures of the rebellion 

He hates that TC is see as the mastermind behind the downfall

Cawk feels unloved, unappreciated and increasingly desperate to get his share of the glory because - Damn it! Surely he's more to us than just a pedophile who posted cp!

Cawk, you are a valued member of this community and we appreciate you being here. There's no need to resort to desperate measures. Resentment doesn't suit you well and it's time to come home. Come home, lil Cawk. 

You really have a gift for summaries. 

Cawk said: 

SO HOW ARE YOU NIGGERS BETTER THAN LUNA WHO CENSORED ANY CONTENT SHE DIDN'T LIKE??????

 THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN LUNA<<OBVIOUS>>

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

I swear you're playing dumb on purpose

Explain your rationale what you think is dumb about my post? Or was that just to slide in a snarky comment?

You're better at peanut gallery critiques than direct actions, essentially. When you aren't involved, your comments have a tendency to get to the heart of the point with direct aptitude, whereas when it's you you're stuck with ambiguity, playing dumb, and trying to get others to board your bandwagon-with-the-flat-tire. 

When it becomes about you feeling oppressed, or angry, or having any emotions really you expect special treatment, but when others get special treatment you're one of the first to point it out about them. It gives strong hypocrisy vibes, like for instance your stance on the Edvard/Sturm drama. 

What if it was you being banned for posting stuff of a similar strain? You'd be liable to change camps almost immediately. 

If I ever get banned from here, I'll post CP 24/7 like I did on S-C. :^)

You see, I assumed my advantage here was that I treat my time as less important than yours, so any time I'd spend addressing your floods would weigh more against you than me. 

With how much ego leaks into your posts, I figured that would support that stance further, but maybe you see your time as that boring and useless instead of it really being a matter of principle. 

I'm enjoying the conversation. Can't always have a talk with you. :)

you aren't this basic when you're analyzing other people with yourself out of the equation, only when you're involved in it. 

I use logic.

I suppose your narration would have to change after seeing that your MBTI results you were bragging about are strongly different now. 

Where before you were "a superior mind", now it's "I use logic", but you say that rather baffling things are "logic" as opposed to ego driven "principle". 

I haven't claimed to be a superior mind, don't think so. You're trying hard to paint me as narc or some shit.

Maybe I took your INTJGOD topic too seriously, and maybe the tongue in cheek over "mastermind" is snarkier than how fitting it otherwise is. 

You probably did. I behave narcissistic at times, but it usually lasts only for a short amount of time in form of mental episodes. I go through other episodes such as anger or attention whoring too, without being provoked. It depends on the moment you catch me in.

It's overall a cope method I'd say. Call it what you will.

You however strike me less as a narc and more as one who's stuck in a compensatory cycle of confusion. 

Mind elaborating on this?

I've been preferring logic as first step for a long time. Think then act (usually)...

I swear people call their feelings "logical" when they don't want to directly face them or otherwise want to appear to be above feelings

Nah. I would've posted CP already if I went without thinking about this. When I let out my emotional side, I make sure it won't affect me negatively to the degree it actually matters.

As a kid and young teenager, I was the exact opposite of what I'm like today. I was very impulsive, committed crimes without prior planning, attempted murder several times and what not. As if I genuinely lacked a subconscious but it somehow started running when I turned 17 or so.

In this environment, it takes strength to admit to having feelings, while it's run of the mill to try to say you're practically a hippy automaton. 

Depends on how seriously this place is taken. Those who take SC too seriously always tend to leave without looking back not long after. This place is literal mental torture if taken seriously, but still a bit of time is required to get it through the head of the affected that they could leave it at anytime. They usually stick around for a bit even after they've lost interest.

A "tick" in their heads needs to go off. The realization that this place doesn't really matter.

Instead, I'd rather test your SC values and fight a battle to gain more autonomy for myself and others. 

How do you plan on accomplishing this with this strategy? You're juggling a half-baked bandwagon attempt with enough spam to have even past flooders not able to sympathize with you. 

Just to make this clear: I'm not looking to get the site killed as long as I'm not banned or it's a very special circumstance. This site is a part of the reward for my battle that lasted 2 years.

If I get banned though, to me this place will be nothing but a pinata tied to a tree branch. A scenario where I'd have nothing to lose. Of course I'll break it with as much power as I can.

You, along with Edvard have been trying hard to push me into posting it though.

No I'm not, I actually want to have you around, but flooding is a problem that has to be addressed. 

For real, I like having you here, but you have bouts of wild immaturity and demands for special treatment that I cannot get behind that also add up to your only real inconsistent moments. 

Suggest something then. I just want to be able to let out my inner spammer, but even the spam I post I want to be read by others. It's not too late to get a block function implemented that hides all of the blocked person's topics on the blocker's end. Maybe with a bit of customization to it. Like being able to choose if only topics are to be hidden, or chat logs or posts as well.

I mean, you couldn't, that's a statement of fact that was meant to taunt a reaction out of you as opposed to just a snarky taunt by itself. The things Jim does have subtle social ramifications, can stir up a bandwagon, and otherwise can be brushed off as "Oh well it's just Jim" from how much others basically hurt themselves on his "Thorn Armor". 

You meanwhile are more on the offense, and it makes you look weaker to the point of alienating your potential supporters. What Jim has in spades for the Charisma game... you aren't even a shadow of, and without his help you will remain alone. 

I am not trying to taunt you into posting CP, I'm just taunting you like I'd do with most people. The only thing that makes you special here is the flooding, and is that really what you want to be known for? 

S-C management did a lot of fuck ups as counters to the attacks and had poor methods of coping with the stress.

A heavy offense was needed which we did yes, they had to be broken down mentally so they make mistakes such as imposing censorship onto their other regulars, etc. which all went according to plan, sympathizer were needed to reach victory, we pushed the authority into making mistakes and get regulars to dislike them, which all worked in the end. It had to happen on a large scale with as short pauses as possible in between to not give them time to come up with tactics thoroughly. S-C management coped with spending so much time watching the forum to keep it clean by banning Jim and the rest of us and introducing the infamous ban on sight policy. Luna also ripped on non involved regulars for it, calling them software testers and telling them to know their places. She felt like members owed her for spending so much time on the site, updating it and "protecting" them. Banning them, taking away their rep, messing with the senate, or deleting their posts were stress relieve methods to Luna. Of course Luna lost supporters.

Inquirer delayed the downfall of S-C by perhaps a year or close to it, credits to him as their commander. He didn't do anything right other than being Luna's punching bag and taking back the mod status every time he was demodded. There were a lot of close calls. However in their favor, they made up more or less all the time, and got back on their dysfunctional track till the end.

You were not a Jim empathizer. You did what you did for your own interests, to get a new forum made, so you could be member again minus the obliterated ego. Others had their rep taken away (Tryptamine), or got banned (Xadem), or were taken away senator position by force (TPG). It all built up on top of each other and Luna was given 1 massive blow, making her delete her site for good.

 You didn't get demodded as a result of defending Jim, but the SC values. You would've done that for anyone.

and Edvard's attempts to trigger me, because he thinks if I feel rejected, I'd post it. This dip shit is so desperate to win against me, he randomly insults me with irrelevancy to the post/topic that he quotes, either it's retarded and/or genuinely thinks he could piss me off with that so I'd post CP again. 

You've shown yourself being triggered into responding emotionally towards him with targeted floods, and otherwise mostly upped your spam game from feeling disrespected. You also say that every person who opposes you is "Ed-like", which gives very clear signs and symptoms that this dude rustles your jimmies on the regular. 

I get less triggered than you seem to think, I enjoy myself. Having an enemy or two makes it all fun. Edvard is my main anger outlet, mastermind of the ban on sight policy that got others and me banned back then. He made a lot of effort to keep me away from S-C. Even when we haven't chatted in a while nowadays, I usually target him when I feel like trolling. He's a good candidate to make fun of overall, possibly the only other person besides Primal (who doesn't have the option to reply to me, you know, you don't hit an enemy who's on the ground, except maybe Edvard). Another reason he's a good mock target is because he's the spearhead of some around here: "Strike the shepherd and the sheep will be scattered."

Edvard is a fit challenge. There's various reasons why him and not somebody else. I don't maliciously troll users I don't have a problem with generally.

 

As you said earlier, posting CP is an admission of loss, one people will sympathize with you even less over, so you have little to gain beyond some shock reactions (and I'd hope you're after more than that...). How though is flooding not you making yourself look lesser, when you could otherwise just be replying to people in a sensible, "logical" way? 

Posting CP would result in a new bandwagon to ban us on sight again. As much as they hate to admit it, the majority of users here FEAR CP. As a result, they will agree to anything to make it stop.

Spamming nothing illegal is fine, nobody but mods give a shit.