I like inq, because he is reliable
I love how Inquirer gets shit if he's antagonistic to people, and gets shit if he's not antagonistic to people. I get Legga, Inquirer is too composed most of the time. There's some fun in making such a guy react/crack/crumble into something more attack-able :D
Either way, Ink's a good sport for having changed his avatar.
There's some fun in making such a guy react/crack/crumble into something more attack-able :D
You ought to join in Ed, maybe we'll get somewhere further with your help.
Either way, Ink's a good sport for having changed his avatar.
Agreed. I'm thinking of trying to make it look half-passable so he might actually want to keep it. It's a pipe dream based on his sense of vanity and what he'd try to call "tradition", but maybe it'll stick.
I prefer him with this avatar honestly, it seems like a fun social experiment that'd contrast his usual aim at appearances.
There's some fun in making such a guy react/crack/crumble into something more attack-able :D
You ought to join in Ed, maybe we'll get somewhere further with your help.
I don't know, I prefer Inq as he is. His stability is refreshing to me.
There are people more fun to rile up here.
There's some fun in making such a guy react/crack/crumble into something more attack-able :D
You ought to join in Ed, maybe we'll get somewhere further with your help.
I don't know, I prefer Inq as he is. His stability is refreshing to me.
There are people more fun to rile up here.
Is he too weak to take a roasting from you? You don't think he'd recover from it if you were a part of it?
Or is it that you don't like roasting your friends, like PalePeach's issue with it?
Turncoat said:Is he too weak to take a roasting from you? You don't think he'd recover from it if you were a part of it?
I have little to roast Inquirer about. I can't fake-roast. When I roast, I mean it.