Sociopath Community

You also think that 99% of the forum is from either Sweden or Ohio 

Xadem said: 

You also think that 99% of the forum is from either Sweden or Ohio 

 The one guy from Ohio will help me.

I remember being the one to tell you that and I can tell you now that I lied 

I am not from either of those, I believe I also said I was from Sweden

Legga said: 

 

This made me think about what Edvard keeps saying. Everyone here has been at the short end of the stick here at least once. That's certainly true for me. But actually has Inquirer ever been at the short end of the stick? Has anyone seen him get pissed off during these, what, 6 years? I sure haven't.

I did tell Luna to fuck off once...

Why would I be at the short end of the stick? I rarely say anything controversial or take sides in drama. It's not hard to be a robot or "infuriatingly consistent" if I don't take many risks.

Probably for the same reason that people who curse are perceived as more honest (and studies show that they actually are). People who are reserved appear like they have something to hide. Whether or not they do.

21:06:56Xadem said: 

You also think that 99% of the forum is from either Sweden or Ohio 

 To be fair, like 65% of the forum actually is from swedan or ohio

Legga said: 

Since I'm fairly bored, I actually went through Inquirer's first posts on Nabble. I figured that, if he ever made any mistakes, it'd have to be at the start.

But I didn't find anything. He's as infuriatingly consistent as ever with his pseudo-intellectual nonsense:

http://forum.2298483.n4.nabble.com/truth-td4701976.html#a4701984

http://forum.2298483.n4.nabble.com/Looking-like-a-killer-td4701785.html#a4701879

I think this already shows how disingenuine he is. Not one person has remained true to their characters to the extent Inquirer has. And that's just unnatural, people are supposed to grow. I'd like to say this is worth an applause, but I won't.

Take for example Edvard rambling on about his thunderstorm picture collection:

http://forum.2298483.n4.nabble.com/can-we-unite-please-td4707425.html#a4707485

or Turncoat about x-men:

http://forum.2298483.n4.nabble.com/can-we-unite-please-td4707425.html#a4707485

That's not consistent with their current characters, which is normal -- interests change.

This made me think about what Edvard keeps saying. Everyone here has been at the short end of the stick here at least once. That's certainly true for me. But actually has Inquirer ever been at the short end of the stick? Has anyone seen him get pissed off during these, what, 6 years? I sure haven't.

Dig up some dirt. There has to be something.

This all seems well and good, but there's still one fatal flaw in your story...

...I still like X-Men. 

As for Inq flaws: 

o The Lemur Whisperer Saga happened with Chet. This was heavily outside of his character, and shows he has a weakness for playing pranks on people if he feels that he can avoid the collateral damages. 

o Inquirer was unapologetically unbanning people who were banned by other people on SC. 

o He gets sucked into MissComm narratives she'd sometimes drop in chat (less often lately). 

o He was able to be suckered into becoming a mod as a PR move when Luna just didn't feel like doing more programming (CP Saga). 

o He's bad at Pop Culture trivia, and might even have bad or questionable tastes. 

o If not baited in there somehow (like him in the Gun Control topic), topics he is less than skilled in he will avoid almost if not entirely. He does not want to look like he lacks knowledge or understanding in a subject. 

o Spatial has the means to make him act funny. When challenged, we've seen him gradually take the discussion less seriously as an extremely inflexible thinker made of pure Stone Wall. When questioned about it, he'll justify how he doesn't have to take his opponents seriously "if they are wrong". 

o Bohemian Rhapsody seemed to give him an increase in confidence that triggered higher-than-thou behaviors in more overtly challenging ways. If you want Inq to be more forward with you, you need to convince him that you're both less intelligent than him and fun to interact with. 

o He's begun to take this website less seriously, and has changed from saying people should say more to saying people type too much. Time has made him considerably lazier. 

o Inq can be pushed by the status quo, and falls prey to the Band Wagon through sheer repeated exposure from numerous peers. This can make it hard to convince him of truths if there aren't others parroting it already. 

o He finds you creepy, so you must be doing something right. 

Edit:
o He assumes he's "normal", and that others who are "normal" will behave as he does. Think about that for a second. 

o He handles more direct forms of confrontation by thinking it's a game. 

This is what you get for not roasting me in my roast topic Inq. 

Turncoat said: 

Legga said: 

or Turncoat about x-men:

http://forum.2298483.n4.nabble.com/can-we-unite-please-td4707425.html#a4707485

This all seems well and good, but there's still one fatal flaw in your story...

...I still like X-Men. 

*gasp*

Darth vader music playing on the background

I knew there was something off about this Ohioan poluation -- it's you isn't it? All of the Ohioans are Turncoat.

Nah but you're alright. You say evil things, but your actions generally result in positive outcomes.

For Inquirer, it's the opposite. He talks about cinnamon buns, and then the city burns. Somehow Inquirer is always in the middle of bad things. Wherever he stands becomes the tragic part of town.